Some inconsistencies and issues in Strong DPRK KTO

[pandacat]

1. I thought SA4 Krug is a long range, mid to high alt missile, but in game it feels like a short range, low alt, point defense weapon. I encountered it several times when attacking airfields. They don’t attack until you are almost right on top on it and their rocket motors burn out fast, indicating a short range missile.

2. US squadrons are full of Korean pilots and some use South Korean flags. Take 13th Squadron for example. I was checking my scores on the status page and thought I got into a wrong squadron.

3. # of aircraft losses not jibe with how many aircraft remaining. Usually #of aircraft losses is way less than actual.

4. KIA pilots got resurrected. Had a squadron mate called Lt. Lo. Got KIA 3 times, but now back on the active pilot roster. :mrgreen:

5. There is a defending Hawk battery in Kimpo airport. They always park right on the runways and making take off and landing hazardous. Possible to move it outside the base? Just put some mobile AAAs on the base if you want point defense for the airport.

[Dee-Jay]

1 - SA4 are very weak and low efficiency systems against fighters.

2 - Known.

3 - Think reinforcements/resupply.

4 - Name are taken “randomly” from a list.

5 - Known issue.

[pandacat]

3 - Yeah, but resupply doesn’t affect actual number of losses right? I mean a mig-29 shot down is a mig shot down unless you can resurrect it from pile of debris. I am ok with number of available planes increasing or not decreasing much after a high casualty battle.

Oh another observation:
Why Seosan tower always identify themselves with Haemi Tower?

[Amraam]

Because in Korea, a lot of airbase can have two names. Seosan and Haemi are the same airbase.

[l3crusader]

@pandacat:

1. I thought SA4 Krug is a long range, mid to high alt missile, but in game it feels like a short range, low alt, point defense weapon. I encountered it several times when attacking airfields. They don’t attack until you are almost right on top on it and their rocket motors burn out fast, indicating a short range missile.

@Dee-Jay:

1 - SA4 are very weak and low efficiency systems against fighters.

That is one part of it, the other part is that the SA-4 FM is kinda FUBAR. SA-5 is pretty poor too, BTW.