Flight Model Manager
-
Is this taboo? I added a GUI editor for the DAT (Standard and AFM) files in my tool…
-
Nothing prevents anyone to make such tool, so no taboo.
We are talking about an internal development tool which got public, on Nizmo website (EBS)… Doesn’t really surprise me.
-
…boola-boola.
-
Well AS someone did. It might not have been in BfB. And it may not have been you. My apologies.
But eagle Su-27 Model and my AFM was included in one FoF theater Release at a time when Nizmo was “welcomed by FO” his words not mine. And he was contributing to FO at the time,
So who was responsible for at least previewing/testing/justifying data edits with no consultation with authors of those inclusions. ?
This may not be the place to have this discussion.
The FO BfB (there are other BfBs out there) was made by Danguard.
I can t remember, nor do i think - the Su-27 was a fly-able in his build, thus no reason to tweak it.Best ask Danguard…
-
-
@Switch:
Trying to make a point?
Yes.
-
@A.S:
The FO BfB (there are other BfBs out there) was made by Danguard.
I can t remember, nor do i think - the Su-27 was a fly-able in his build, thus no reason to tweak it.Best ask Danguard…
You don’t remember, if you say Nizmo wasn’t a FO member and the 27 wasn’t in one of the FoF releases with eagles “acquired” model with a AFM I had been working on for a few years, it wasn’t perfect but better then what we had previously.
Some one used BMS’s FM manger to add a unrealistic performance increase to the engine outputs in that release. Which I had painstakingly worked and tested. And it was at a time after Nizmo was asked to leave the 801st and had joined FO. And yes He was eventually kicked form there too. The whole “stolen” model fiasco was eventual exposed and the 27 was withdrawn from use.
Water under the bridge, however it was a very disappointing time for me.
-
You don’t remember, “if” you say Nizmo wasn’t a FO member and the 27 wasn’t in one of the FoF releases with eagles “acquired” model with a AFM I had been working on for a few years, it wasn’t perfect but better then what we had previously.
An “if”, yet no, “then nor why”??
C9
-
@Cloud:
An “if”, yet no, “then nor why”??
C9
You posting under the influence again. Or still ? ( a home brew item ) :munch:
-