:woohoo:
Posts made by SEG
-
RE: WIP: F-14 B/D
Here’s what I’ve found :
Looks like :- cove doors move as one piece ;
- cove doors share the same hinges than flaps ;
- cove doors have two positions : DOWN and UP ;
- same cove doors process for the auxiliary flap.
Flaps UP (0°) = Cover door > down (Clean profile)
Flaps MANEUVER (0° > 10°) = Cover door > down (not enought separated from flap to move up)
Flaps DOWN (at 25°) = Spoilers at -4.5° to meet cover door ;
Flaps DOWN (10° > 35°) = Cover door > up (My guess is that door going directly to UP… but I’m not sure) -
RE: WIP: F-14 B/D
OK sorry for my bad understanding
Not to be annoying: If i’m not mistaking in picture 2 and 3 of your april 22 's post, wing sweep looks at is minimum (around 20°) so in that case, auxiliary flap should be extended (because this action is linked with “main flap down more than 5°”).
I 'll look at the cove door. -
RE: WIP: F-14 B/D
it rotates up as one part even if only the main flap is deployed, will have to check if in RL it is a two piece componenthttps://i.imgur.com/gaI9HTr.png
Hi Stingray 62,
Congratulations for the work you are still doing on this bird.About Tomcat’s flaps law :
- Auxiliary flaps have only two positions > UP or DOWN (35°)
- In addition to some speed’s limits, flaps positions limit the wing-sweep position :
- Less than 21° sweep if the auxiliary flaps are down.
- Less than 50° if the main flaps are extended.
- Between 21° and 50° sweep > main flaps will extend but auxiliary will remain retracted.
For info, slats don’t affect the wing sweep posit
NATOPS procedures say :
- Landing > Wing sweep = 20° + all flaps full down as one piece (35°)
- Take off > Wing sweep = 20° + flaps as required (Flaps up take off are available according to gross weight and thrust conditions !)
-
RE: BMS 4.34 screenshots
First batch of 2000D…
https://i.imgur.com/XDD0b5U.pngNice idea to present Mirage from french DGA thank you :clap2:
-
RE: F-4 Phantom
LAU-7 and round adaptators for sidewinders
Same than the ones used on german japanese and iranian F-4.
http://www.ebayshopkorea.com/main/view?itemID=163253317467
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/5/0/5/1992505.jpg?v=v40 -
RE: F-4 Phantom
On the same wing, the 2 sections moved separately : The inner slat was fully retractable at high speeds, but the outer slat remained deployed in both the cruise and high-lift con-figurations
-
RE: Test low-poly toys in BMS4..
The Northrop YA-9, the opponent of the Warthog.
-
RE: F-4 Phantom
141th TFW NEW JERSEY :
AF-68267
AF-68464 (141 TFS) http://aircraftprofiles.net/zoomfolio/108th-wing-new-jersey-ang/
AF-68357 (141 TFS) http://www.wikiwand.com/en/141st_Air_Refueling_Squadron (Tiger in the noise section)131th TFW MISSOURI :
AF-69267 https://modelingmadness.com/review/viet/us/kol32f4.htm
AF-68526
AF-68401 http://www.arcforums.com/forums/air/index.php?/topic/259584-172-fujimi-f-4e131-tfw-missouri-ang/
AF-68338 https://toptoy.com.au/products/hasegawa-hapt08-1-48-scale-f-4e-with-one-piece-canopy-model-kit
AF-68410 http://www.airliners.net/photo/USA-Air-Force/McDonnell-Douglas-F-4E-Phantom-II/1171754 -
RE: Test low-poly toys in BMS4..
Goldorak’s vessel : an 80’s old school manga serie.
-
RE: Problem with carrier flight in TE
Thank you for reply. Nothing to do with this beautiful theater : It was (of course) my mistake ! :dhorse:
The point that I have missed was the ability to change a CVN’s team during the TE building (even if the correct color is pictured on the CVN).
As Mav JP said : It has to be done separately (I re assigned the CVN to the adequate team via Mission Commander).
Now the CVN belongs to the team expected and the flight runs well.
Thank you to you guys ! -
RE: Problem with carrier flight in TE
Ok. I must have misunderstood something !
Here’s shots taken from my TE in MCStation ILS
Objectives