this chinese page has bms 4.37 leaked photo? is this legit photo or photoshop?
https://www.bilibili.com/read/cv16379429
Best posts made by vfp
-
RE: Santa's wishlist for BMS
-
RE: Santa's wishlist for BMS
i am impressed about the f-15c ,i start to change my mind about the capability of bms and what the team can do , at the end bms
could be with the right decisions not an only an F-16 simulator,the truth is that i wait 4.38 but i welcome with all my heart the implementation of other aircrafts too with the quality and love that you show with f-16.
i would like to see f-18c also Mirage2000-5 and from the other side su-27 and mig 29 if you are able to, but from what i read in the how the BMS team works thread this might take much time or never be done , this needs ppl more ppl or the existing ones to have the desire to make it and work like crazy, so for now
i just wait 4.38 and i welcome the new direction that bms is turned to . -
RE: Quick update from the BMS Frontlines - November 2021
yes i think those of us that dont have access like few ,we deserve a screenshot or something as a preview
-
RE: Another F16 entry coming "someday"?
You can always ask them if they will be a consumers version
Some of You say it’s not for commercial use,I agree at a point but then can you show me a military sim that US Air Force uses right now I mean a trailer or something? I mean that professional simulators have not trailers on the web or at least I am not aware of any ,for example if Dcs does military contracts and has pro modules I believe you will never see them and maybe you can’t afford them even if you find them.maybe this is the case with META , professional modules that you will never see
And public consumers version ,but again they have a nice
Communication form and you can ask what they intend to do.
And you can Inform us as wellThe market needs more companies to stop the arrogance of dcs or at least more choises
-
RE: Santa's wishlist for BMS
BMS need to get a modern graphics engine and UI… everything else is really good! Please don’t forget VR, and don’t be afraid of increasing the performance impact, it’s 2022.
what means its 2022?
what means dont afraid to increase performance impact?
you mean make it uplayble ?
that sentence is unacceptable
if you want to show your admire about new graphics you have to have a measure to your words
you see that a lot of ppl here comment the performance even 10 fps is a matter of joy for them anyway i think the team knows betterone more thing how do you push buttons in vr? how do you control the plane besides throttle and stick ,and how much time
you can stay with vr without loosing your eyes and head? can you stay for 5 hours for example? -
RE: Quick update from the BMS Frontlines - November 2021
@maxwaldorf said in Quick update from the BMS Frontlines - November 2021:
4.36 will rock your world and 4.37 will revolutionize your GFX card
take your time have fun
-
RE: How do you send a private message on this new forum
at the top right you go to chat icon next to your avatar icon you open all chats you select the user and you talk like chat ,if he likes you he will talk back lol
-
RE: Quick update from the frontlines, 4.36
<p>is the avatar of i-hawk in reddit the new terain?that shows a cliff and sea, i dont mean the usual photo that had been shown i mean the avatar<br /><span style=“background-color:#e60000”>test test</span><br /><br />this is what i am talking about <span style=“color:#008a00”>IF SO that would be awsome :)</span><br /><a href=“https://styles.redditmedia.com/t5_26e629/styles/profileIcon_3pfkcjppdh581.png?width=256&height=256&crop=256:256,smart&s=1bfdf2e11879ab1d2d5626e0d7b4e0276e64a02a” target=“_blank”>https://styles.redditmedia.com/t5_26e629/styles/profileIcon_3pfkcjppdh581.png?width=256&height=256&crop=256:256,smart&s=1bfdf2e11879ab1d2d5626e0d7b4e0276e64a02a</a><br /><br /><span style=“color:#e60000”>test test</span><br /><br /><br /></p>
-
RE: Mod: Using MSFS as rendering engine for Falcon BMS - and enable VR
<p>@molnibalage <br /><br />maybe i talk bullshit but a confirmation from a team member would be great<br /><br />as i read reddit i found this only i-hawk can confirm<br /><a href=“https://styles.redditmedia.com/t5_26e629/styles/profileIcon_3pfkcjppdh581.png?width=256&height=256&crop=256:256,smart&s=1bfdf2e11879ab1d2d5626e0d7b4e0276e64a02a” target=“_blank”>https://styles.redditmedia.com/t5_26e629/styles/profileIcon_3pfkcjppdh581.png?width=256&height=256&crop=256:256,smart&s=1bfdf2e11879ab1d2d5626e0d7b4e0276e64a02a</a><br /><br /><br /><span style=“color:#0066cc”>i like to write with colour </span><span style=“color:#e60000”>if the photo is nonsense dont give any attention</span><br /></p>
-
RE: Quick update from the frontlines, 4.36
<p><span style=“color:#008a00”>So this is the month of release? this will be a sunshine with all the bad things happen right now in the world </span><br /><span style=“color:#008a00”>although i would prefer to wait a little more for 4,37 but its ok </span><br /></p>
-
RE: Quick update from the frontlines, 4.36
<p>@MaxWaldorf @Seifer<br /><br />doesnt help a lot to performance of campaign comparing to tactical engangemet missions.<br />thats what i mean , i believe that this is a wise system i mean the bubble system but i cannont understand why campaign has lower<br />performance or is more demanding since TE and campaign has the bubble system i assume there is more involved to campaign’s lower performance and when i mean performance i mean lower fps . well for sure my pc doesnt help .<br /><br /> and i dont want to be misunderstood i dont criticize the bubble system <br /><br /><br /></p>
-
RE: Quick update from the frontlines, 4.36
<p>is time for trailer maybe?</p>
-
RE: Yet another update from the frontlines... 4.37 U3 progress
right now i have 32g of ddr5 and 8 gb from 3070ti
but besides me if a game suffers in performance
with a descent high specs modern system ,then
this is the game’s problem the rest are excuses
this was my thesis since always