WIP: F-35A
-
-
-
Beautiful work, … once again.
Cheers,
LS+1 here, even if i hate this shape of aircraft…
But “Hayab” makes it to seemed very nice :p.
Thank you for your hard efforts “Hayab”, Respect!
Nikos. -
Very cool. This will be a good addition.
-
Great work dear Hayab!
Even I don’t like F-35 aircraft herself, I love the fact you involved yourself creating this asset that will become in the next years more and more frequent to be seen around our airfields!
Please don’t forget JASDF livery!
Best regards,
Radium
-
Very good work. Bravo
-
Good news, good work Hayab!
-
The model looks promising I just do no understand the “target”. F-35 has no real role in Falcon’s universe. Most of its capability cannot be modeled and in case are modeled combat would be childplay if you are in F-35. I rather love to see new MiG-21 models. Tons of air force used (or even use today) so tons of skinmaker and player can love it because can see with their country’s skin and literally every theater can see the benefit of MiG-21s. Even its FM and any other modeled feature can be upgraded.
-
The model looks promising I just do no understand the “target”. F-35 has no real role in Falcon’s universe. Most of its capability cannot be modeled and in case are modeled combat would be childplay if you are in F-35. I rather love to see new MiG-21 models. Tons of air force used (or even use today) so tons of skinmaker and player can love it because can see with their country’s skin and literally every theater can see the benefit of MiG-21s. Even its FM and any other modeled feature can be upgraded.
Molni,
Your very own and respectable vision of BMS demands new MiG 21as a major priority, but please understand that it is not the same for some others…
So…
Why don’t you do it yourself? These remarks of yours trend more and more compulsive, when someone initiate a project…
And if you tell me you are not talented for it, let me reply that before knowing, we don’t…
Let’s create your dreams instead of expecting and being not satisfied by others.
-
Also we have F-22 already, so F-35 is much needed addition since this aircraft will be the backbone of western air forces for the next 50 years. As aviation evolves, so must Falcon (IMHO).
-
Molni,
Your very own and respectable vision of BMS demands new MiG 21as a major priority, but please understand that it is not the same for some others…
So…
Why don’t you do it yourself? These remarks of yours trend more and more compulsive, when someone initiate a project…
And if you tell me you are not talented for it, let me reply that before knowing, we don’t…
Let’s create your dreams instead of expecting and being not satisfied by others.
MiG-21 was just random example, you could select any AC or ground vehicle from the '70s to mid/late '90s.
-
MiG-21 was just random example, you could select any AC or ground vehicle from the '70s to mid/late '90s.
So does my answer for any other model!
Please start building BMS compliant objects, it would be great for everybody!
-
So does my answer for any other model!
I tried to make 3D models about 7 years ago and I failed… It was too hard to create even a texture map and I had to idea about moving part, DB importing, etc. Is literally no help for any 3D modeller who wish to learn. Repvez complained n+1 times because of this. He asked my times help in PM and as I know NOBODY ever respoded to him… He offered his half made Gripen 3D model still no aswer… So, good luck for learning 3D model to Falcon… I would happily do it in case I had the slightest idea how can be done…
So rather learning 3D modeling I did what I was able to do. I made DB changes, etc and released a totally different 3rd party theater 3D models what I was able to integrate and rearranged some 3D models with different skins.
I simply do not get it. What is the point creating 3D models for units which cannot be placed well in any tactical enviroment? Why is so hard to understand this. Nobody ever replyed on this… Can you guess why I recyclde the tons of garbage in DB?
-
I’m excited to see these new aircraft in Falcon (F-35 & F-22) ….There is enough Info out there to make these aircraft enjoyable to fly and fight in BMS…The F-35 has some apparent shortcomings,but,it’s a state of the art system…and it’s strengths will prove valuable in many situations presently and in the future…
Very nice model Hayab,looking forward to flyin it… -
Repvez complained n+1 times because of this. He asked my times help in PM and as I know NOBODY
Sorry,
You absolutely don’t know
anything. I have been exchanging mails with Repvez, and, I was the last one to send a mail, but, I really, reallydo not want to blame him, as internet communications are sometimes complicated to established and keep.Please avoid talking about stuff you obviously don’t know.
-
I simply do not get it. What is the point creating 3D models for units which cannot be placed well in any tactical enviroment? Why is so hard to understand this. Nobody ever replyed on this… Can you guess why I recyclde the tons of garbage in DB?
Because when people start a 3d model (especially for free), they want to model stuff they like and not feel they are obligated to do something. After all, we are talking about several dozen of hours of sometimes tedious work.
-
Sorry,
You absolutely don’t know
anything. I have been exchanging mails with Repvez, and, I was the last one to send a mail, but, I really, reallydo not want to blame him, as internet communications are sometimes complicated to established and keep.Please avoid talking about stuff you obviously don’t know.
Hm… He forgot to mention this…
-
But ….is BMS trying to reproduce the 70’s to 90’s era ? … i do not think so. The avionics of the F-16 currently simulated and what we can expect in the future is to my opinion different from what earlier blocks had topropose.
If i follow your reasoning about BMS …then it is pointless to have a Sniper TGP modelled … or datalink … or HMC … NVG’s … AIM-9X … colour MFD’s …INS coupled with GPS … because all those stuff have no place for the F-16 during the timeframe you constantly refer too.
If we want to focus on an era … then defenitively not the one you refer to. No MLU, no CCIP F-16’s, no Block 52+ … just F-16 A and early block 25 to 32 models … or up to Block 52 without CCIP.
-
Excellent model, thank you!
-
But ….is BMS trying to reproduce the 70’s to 90’s era ? … i do not think so. The avionics of the F-16 currently simulated and what we can expect in the future is to my opinion different from what earlier blocks had topropose.
If i follow your reasoning about BMS …then it is pointless to have a Sniper TGP modelled … or datalink … or HMC … NVG’s … AIM-9X … colour MFD’s …INS coupled with GPS … because all those stuff have no place for the F-16 during the timeframe you constantly refer too.
If we want to focus on an era … then defenitively not the one you refer to. No MLU, no CCIP F-16’s, no Block 52+ … just F-16 A and early block 25 to 32 models … or up to Block 52 without CCIP.
This is not true.
NVGs became available in late '90s.
Datalink also was available in '90s also for a part of F-16C fleet. During AF and F-16 downed a MiG-29 without turning on the radar on the Viper…
I’m not sure in color MFD. I do not know when got and which F-16 colod MFD but F-15C got in '90s but what a luck you can turn off the colod MFD so this is not a problem.
INS was even in F-16A as I can remember and of course in Block 25 which got the classical cockpit arrangement and in that time GPS also was available.
Before Sniper F-16C had LANTIRN and LITENING which at least had some features of Sniper of course with smaller res and zoom.From my aspect even AIM-9X and similar missiles are bad because as I know there is no real thrust vectoring model in BMS4… Of couse R-73 has TVC and came much earlier but this should not mean that you apply and extrapolate the same inaccuare base model for more and mor missiles…