Korea '80s Theater - discussion
-
Cloud 9 tested my campaigns. Worked for him but somehow in Rollin Fire to me dose not. In Iron Fortress I tried F-14A and A-6E, they are worked. I have no idea what can cause the problem.
-
A quick question. Do you wish to see a bit modified DB and campaigns wth '90s era settings?
That would be nice Molnibalage! What period of the 90´s are you planning to portrait? 1991-1995 (1st Gulf War and Balcans) or 1995-1999 (Kosovo war)?
About the carriers, I´ve noticed that if they stay on the same spot, the catapult routine works for both F/A-18 and Tomcats, but if it moves, them you can´t take off⌠I haven´t tested landing thou (but managed to take off on both IF and RF campaigns)
cheers!
-
@'Corporal_Lib:
;320679â]About the carriers, I´ve noticed that if they stay on the same spot, the catapult routine works for both F/A-18 and Tomcats, but if it moves, them you can´t take offâŚ
Correct and they should be stationary in the campaign files that are in the 80âs theater, I fixed them for Molni. If you see a carrier moving, let us know, as like I said, theyâre all set to be stationary.
C9
-
Any news about fixing carriers?
In the next release will be a new and fictional jet, the F-20 Tigershark. I created using the aero data of F-5, I adjusted the weight and I set the thrust data of Hornet. Yes this is very far from accurate modeling but for fun is not so bad.
Skin is supplied (as usual) VO101_Tom.
(Final rack config has not been set, the MER and dual AIM-9 rail is missing.)
-
Any news about fixing carriers?
The BMS_NAVAL_OPS doc has all the info on how to add a carrier to a DB and a campaign.
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/content.php?170-BMS-Naval-Operations -
The BMS_NAVAL_OPS doc has all the info on how to add a carrier to a DB and a campaign.
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/content.php?170-BMS-Naval-OperationsI know, it does not work to me. In case a player join to a sq. flight will be cancelled.
-
I know, it does not work to me. In case a player join to a sq. flight will be cancelled.
MP or SP ?
Positive you did not miss any step in the addition to the DB or the campaign ?
-
MP or SP ?
Positive you did not miss any step in the addition to the DB or the campaign ?
SP.
The linked doc as I know outdated. I was not able to set functional carriers using that⌠Bad Boy than Cloud 9 made the changes in TE. In Bad Boyâs version this issue did not existed.
-
SP.
The linked doc as I know outdated. I was not able to set functional carriers using that⌠Bad Boy than Cloud 9 made the changes in TE. In Bad Boyâs version this issue did not existed.
Iâm certain it is NOT outdated. It was written for 4.32, not for any other version, and still works. Other theaters have used it to make their carriers works (ex : Panama).
If the issue is also present when you build a TE using the TE builder in your theater, that means the carrier and the associated objective are not set properly in the DB.
-
F-20. You can see the rack settings, single/dual AIM-9 rails and singe and MER rack. Skin is supplied (as usual) VO101_Tom.
-
Be sure to swap engine data in FM.
-
Wonderfull monli!!!
-
Be sure to swap engine data in FM.
I have done it and tested. It has fantastic kinematics comparing to F-5E but the fuel consumption is quite big at higer RPM zone. With two AIM-9 at high alt without afterburner this kind of F-20 can reach almost M1.0âŚ
but with very high fuel consumption. -
QQ on this theater/campaign: Does the latest version of WDP function with theater? I have not been able to get it to work, though wanted to verify if the problem is on my side or if it is simply not supported at this time in WDP.
~S~
wind -
QQ on this theater/campaign: Does the latest version of WDP function with theater? I have not been able to get it to work, though wanted to verify if the problem is on my side or if it is simply not supported at this time in WDP.
~S~
windI have no idea, because I never used it. This is just a new theater. If WDP works with other theaters I do not know any reason why should not work with this.
-
Updated with final skin.
-
Any news about fixing carriers?
In the next release will be a new and fictional jet, the F-20 Tigershark. I created using the aero data of F-5, I adjusted the weight and I set the thrust data of Hornet. Yes this is very far from accurate modeling but for fun is not so bad.
Skin is supplied (as usual) VO101_Tom.
(Final rack config has not been set, the MER and dual AIM-9 rail is missing.)
That jet, a dedicated pit and FMâŚand youâd be my hero.:DâŚplus Iâd come back to Falcon after being bored to crap from F-16s.
Roughly 1 year hard work for a modder:shock:, so rather unlikelyâŚ
-
Updated with final skin.
You mean like âupdated and availableâ ??âŚIf so I reinstall Falcon BMS today lol.
-
So far I shared the DB what contains it only the person who asked the F-20. Of course you wish to get such update what contains only this I can upload it as a new release.
-
Molni, I sent you a pm to not carry this further off topic.