PHANTOM PHOR EVER LODS :)
-
Im trying to fix the english one to read the tail pod texture right but i can, can anyone help here?
Partially fixed but still has some glitches…
That part isn’t framewired. The bms_model is wired. If somebody know how to wire it???
-
That part isn’t framewired. The bms_model is wired. If somebody know how to wire it???
Nurse, ccc provided me a new M model and i didnt had the time to test it yet but i will in the coming days….
-
Thanks, …something nice is building up here!!!
-
-
Manos, update if you can the G version dat with the “Has_HTS 1” in additional data as the Wild Weasel version should have
Cheers
-
Molni in the pack i had the B-D-J-N-S-M-K versions had harcoded on the lod itself the double rack on inner wing pylons but C-E version didnt. If you use the double rack i have in the rar file the in early versions without the changes i made looks funny in 3d world as they look like they have double double pylons, if you dont use it in E-C versions you have invisible racks. But you can as anothe friend here posted to use the default double rack from falcon. Actually now im working on it to get to E-C version the same double racks that ealry versions has cause it actually looks better than the one i have in the rar
As for the skins it gonna take me some time to upload them as i have to collect them and seperate them for each version and set…
What dat file you used? Just rename the dat file i have in F-4E from f4e.dat to f4f.dat and us that i think you will be fine or else tell me i might made a mistake there…You attached for every variant dat file next to the LOD I used that.
I do not understant your comment about rack and HPs. I clearly remember that on FF at least some F-4 variant had independent HP slots for each AIM-9 without rack. This meant you could pack Sidewinders reagardless of AG loadout on lower HP station, similar to F-15 or F-111. (F-111 could carry 1xAIM-9 on each inner wing HP but they rarely did it.) So it is 100% unimportat that I import the rack what you attached because that slots do not exist on the LOD.
-
Fixed……
New Lod : https://www.sendspace.com/file/hjz7qb Thanks to ccc1tw
F-4F dat file Molni: https://www.sendspace.com/file/q8p7z9
I ll try to see what can i do about the rails maybe i’ve made something wrong here…. (probably)Edit: Yeah i made a mistake… You can’t upload both AG and aim-9 anymore… so i have to repack the models… I have exported as a block the original B,D,N,J etc double rail as a block if anyone can help me here to import it in E and C version as well i will be very thankfull guys!
Update coming soon… -
Fixed……
New Lod : https://www.sendspace.com/file/hjz7qb Thanks to ccc1tw
F-4F dat file Molni: https://www.sendspace.com/file/q8p7z9
I ll try to see what can i do about the rails maybe i’ve made something wrong here…. (probably)Edit: Yeah i made a mistake… You can’t upload both AG and aim-9 anymore… so i have to repack the models… I have exported as a block the original B,D,N,J etc double rail as a block if anyone can help me here to import it in E and C version as well i will be very thankfull guys!
Update coming soon…F-4M should be applied for which F-4 variant?
Does this mean you can fix/upgrade as way the model to be able to model the real full config of any F-4? Becaus this requires also dat files change because of rack definitions in dat file.
-
F-4M should be applied for which F-4 variant?
Does this mean you can fix/upgrade as way the model to be able to model the real full config of any F-4? Becaus this requires also dat files change because of rack definitions in dat file.
Yes Molni…. F-4M for M variant of course… the lod i have in the pack has a proble in the tail and the texture doesnt seem right!
-
Yes Molni…. F-4M for M variant of course… the lod i have in the pack has a proble in the tail and the texture doesnt seem right!
For me USAF, RokAF F-4E and F-4D are important besides F-4G and LW F-4F. These are used in campaigns.
-
@Manos, perhaps give the crown a new zipped package containing all the latest-updated models, instead of individual model updates each time. That would be more easy.
-
Fixed……
New Lod : https://www.sendspace.com/file/hjz7qb Thanks to ccc1tw
F-4F dat file Molni: https://www.sendspace.com/file/q8p7z9
I ll try to see what can i do about the rails maybe i’ve made something wrong here…. (probably)Edit: Yeah i made a mistake… You can’t upload both AG and aim-9 anymore… so i have to repack the models… I have exported as a block the original B,D,N,J etc double rail as a block if anyone can help me here to import it in E and C version as well i will be very thankfull guys!
Update coming soon…Neither using the F4E and latest F4f.dat file fixed the problem.
-
For me USAF, RokAF F-4E and F-4D are important besides F-4G and LW F-4F. These are used in campaigns.
I know… I will try to do the best i can… In FF c-e doesnt have slots for aim-9 seperate thats what i wanna fix cause ccc’s models also dont have…
-
@Manos, perhaps give the crown a new zipped package containing all the latest-updated models, instead of individual model updates each time. That would be more easy.
I will soon Raptor! Molni something is wrong i don’t know what my -F works fine…
try this for a change: Export the -F texture list and save and install the -E model into -F parent record then import the texture list and tes it again with the dat file i provided. -
Molni you mean that right? This pic its from FF for reference purposes only… I dont know but im still searching to fix so F-4 in BMS will have this type of load out. In ff it shows as seperate hardpoints for the aim-9’s… And only -B-J-N-S have this feature maybe -K-M as well C-D-E don’t.Still looking to fix that
-
Molni you mean that right? This pic its from FF for reference purposes only… I dont know but im still searching to fix so F-4 in BMS will have this type of load out. In ff it shows as seperate hardpoints for the aim-9’s… And only -B-J-N-S have this feature maybe -K-M as well C-D-E don’t.Still looking to fix that
Yes, that is what I mentioned….!
In case I remember well. Because F4.0 is mosty “land based” is sad that naval variant have/had such kind of HPs and land based are not. In case somehow slots of that LODs could be redefined… The AIM-9S do not have rail in FF, they have invisable racks as bombs on F-15E, their positions are only defined.
-
Yes, that is what I mentioned….!
In case I remember well. Because F4.0 is mosty “land based” is sad that naval variant have/had such kind of HPs and land based are not. In case somehow slots of that LODs could be redefined… The AIM-9S do not have rail in FF, they have invisable racks as bombs on F-15E, their positions are only defined.
Im trying my Best… I will see if i can through f-4browse as well to fix that cause the slots are there in the lod… But hardpoints are only 9 and not 13 as the slots are…
-
Molni… The naval version of the Phantoms in FF have individual hard points for everything. I’m having a hard time find out how to do this in BMS. There’s only those 9 hardpoints i mentioned erlier… Anyone else can help maybe?
Could it be because in FF lods the wing pylons are in one branch all together and the rails again and another? In the models that im working now every hardpoint its a different branch, but also browsing with f4browse in .fed file for -BJNS it has different registered hardpoints completely than the other versions (in the pics below in red circle and arrow the hardpoints used by -B) FF: BMS: -
Molnibalage : Im close…… Very close… I edited and added hardpoints with F4browse (addcopy function) and as you can see im close… but in that case if i complete it how can i share that?
update : Now i have to figure out how to get rid of the f-16 racks, probably now i have to edit the .dat file
Update 2 : A little edit in the front sparrow slots and i think we are ok therefore as it is is very good i think. Now only thing left is to edit the others as well (versions i mean) but still in -E & -C we have invisible aim-9 rails maybe ccc1tw might help here….
I forgot now you can load 4 different aim-9’s!!! -
Molnibalage : Im close…… Very close… I edited and added hardpoints with F4browse (addcopy function) and as you can see im close… but in that case if i complete it how can i share that?
update : Now i have to figure out how to get rid of the f-16 racks, probably now i have to edit the .dat file
Update 2 : A little edit in the front sparrow slots and i think we are ok therefore as it is is very good i think. Now only thing left is to edit the others as well (versions i mean) but still in -E & -C we have invisible aim-9 rails maybe ccc1tw might help here….
I forgot now you can load 4 different aim-9’s!!!Wow, how could yo do this? How you defined new HP slots? This is what I wish all F-4 variants. Yehaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaw!