Some 4.33 issues…
-
deactivate video from config options if you run 64 bits ?
-
@Red:
deactivate video from config options if you run 64 bits ?
if you mean display intro movie? yes I did try that. no change.
Oh I forgot how amazed I got that even with 14 fps on inclement weather the sim was flawless and stable and super fluid. no hickups like I had 30+ fps… wow RESPECT.
And wow on the Falcon Editor… many many things are there …
-
Damn I must be damned some how… or I need a OS restart…
I just can’t reboot right now as I upload the 4.33 setup file to Mediafire for guys to have an alternative than torrent.
First time the avionics configuration worked fine… I did some test flights and now displays like that:
-
-
After the reboot the first time Avionics Configurator had the same behavior… after a few minutes an a java update it is running ok now.
Still remains the 64bit exe problem.
-
So far what I found during testing. (Should I create a new thread for bug or similar issues?)
On Tornado IDS GER under fueselage most of bombs simply do not appear because rack / HP configs. Something does not work well. This is so strange because FF suffered from 100% same issue. The Tornado was imported without fixing this? With old rack.dat in my old MOD I fixed this but in BMS4 Tornado uses new bmsrack.dat. I can try to fix it. (Tornado IDS with '80s camo is one of my favorite jet.)
It is surprise to me that Patriot did not get the same launch method as SA-10.
-
(Why did not get the same launch modeling the Patriot as S-300? They are identical in this area.)
No time to model BLUFOR Sams. On the to-do list.
-
So far what I found during testing. (Should I create a new thread for bug or similar issues?)
Patriot has too small bubble about at 14 nm comes into 3D world, eng. zone is limited because of this. Or I have to check again. It engaged me only at 14 nm, I chekced the 2D/3D world be labels but in DB bubble dist value is good.
(Why did not get the same launch modeling the Patriot as S-300? They are identical in this area.)On Tornado IDS GER under fueselage most of bombs simply do not appear because rack / HP configs. Something does not work well. This is so strange because FF suffered from 100% same issue. The Tornado was imported without fixing this? With old rack.dat in my old MOD I fixed this but in BMS4 Tornado uses new bmsrack.dat. I can try to fix it. (Tornado IDS with '80s camo is one of my favorite jet.)
-
about Patriot, we’ll take a look
-
about Tornado rack : know issue (already fixed in dev branch) , you’ll need to wait for U1
BB
-
-
RGR, in this case I do not work on them.
I saw Tornados got new and unqiue drop tanks accoriding their skinks. Do you plan the same for F-15A/B/C/D and F-15E? I can send skins what VO101_Tom made me.
-
Ask to Switch
BB
-
Pls help…
Hotas Warthog
Only F/A 18
Ramp start : My throttle does not work, does not respond to movement, do not move…no start…
Runway start : all OK, throttle react.
Somewhere to be little mistake and I can not see…:(Thx
-
@Bad:
Ask to Switch
BB
Is this his exact nickname?
VO101_Tom suggested to apply all of his skin as defult/alternative for BMS4. He made many of good skin to lowres modells besides drop tanks.
J-7, as long as they do not have better 3D models than current.
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?9766-Korea-80s-Theater-discussion&p=204498&viewfull=1#post204498Tu-22M. (Is a less darg variant skin with same panel lines.)
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?9766-Korea-80s-Theater-discussion&p=205026&viewfull=1#post205026Alternative Soviet skins for MiG-23 for Hayab’s 3D model.
Su-27 should have this skin. (somebody made just after 4.32 release, not VO101_Tom)
-
-
Rgr.
Anothe minor issue. On MiG-29 emergency jettison releases the AAM and only dropt tank remained in centerline HP. So far worked the opposite way. Is this a bug or simply some new features causes this?
-
The only problems I’ve noted so far (32 bit bms on 64bit win7) is that the mfd extract tool fails to receive data for the RWR and HSI, the other extracted displays seem to work fine.
Cheers, Uwe
-
Hey Molni,
It is surprise to me that Patriot did not get the same launch method as SA-10.
what do you mean exactly?
SA-10 is VLS, Patriot is not…Cheers
Biker -
Hey Molni,
what do you mean exactly?
SA-10 is VLS, Patriot is not…Cheers
BikerI mean launch with a fixed angle. Of course the angle is different but it is a fixed value as I know. So SA-10 launches SAM always in vertical. Is it possible to set Patriot to launch SAM with a different but static angle? On every images and videos what I have seen so far the angle seems to me the same, close to 45 deg. What about Tor? Is it possible the model the vertical launch and quick turn? I saw that SA-5 does the 48 deg climb but after the almost horizontal launch. In RL can be launched also only with a fixed angle which is 48 deg as I can remember.
Similar topic is missile launch from AC. Now all (?) AAM is dropped even regardless some of them is rail launched. The drop looks very good for ex. on F-15 fuselage HPs, but on outer wing and all HP of F-16 is a bit weird. What are the plans on this area?
-
Guys,
I just installed a clean version of BMS 3.44 as per instructions, but somehow my graphics keep messing up. After Pie 4 i can hear the engine, but Pie 5 keeps flickering between ingame, switching back to Pie 2 and this loop continues endlesly…
I’m running a Quadcore Q8300 on a P5B Deluxe, 8 GB of mem ( DDR2 ) and a ATI Radeon HD 4870.
Graphic Settings In Game :
Settings…
Not what i’m seeing…I’ll post a video of what i’m acually seeing on screen…it’s uploading as we speak.
Also, it runs in windowed settings, without issues…
-
What are the plans on this area?
Plan is to get some rest, take some holidays and enjoy a little bit the 433 with friends without being always in a beta test process. Isn’t it Stefan?