Harrier 2 Load Out Help!!!
-
Are there any plans to allow TERs for LGBs in this mod? And will the mod break multiplayer?
-
awesome. i tested it on Israel TO and 2012 carrier-max camp.
OOOPS!
i dont have a clean install here i need to test it later
nice load out selection.
-
hey buddy you don’t have to worry about it i asked around in the 420th forum and got a swift reply by my friend there RAM22 i dont know if you heard of him. Anyway i will make a zip file for you with all that you need for the loadout if you are still interested
i have seen his name before but i havent corresponded before with him
-
Are there any plans to allow TERs for LGBs in this mod? And will the mod break multiplayer?
hi Tirak
TER? what does TER stand for?(edit) sorry i read the marine article you posted. Triple ejector rack TER!
yes a triple load of lgbs under each wing would be nice
looks like only mavericks have TER in mod so far
maybe this should be added to the update also. -
-
hi Tirak
TER? what does TER stand for?(edit) sorry i read the marine article you posted. Triple ejector rack TER!
yes a triple load of lgbs under each wing would be nice
looks like only mavericks have TER in mod so far
maybe this should be added to the update also.Or at the very least the ability to mount 2 LGBs on the TERs like the F-16 does. Combined with the centerline TGP, that puts our AV-8Bs up to 8 LGBs for strike missions. It’s a shame they only tested the Brimstone on the GR9, so no chance of that coming over for the 18 Brimstone loadout, but if we get the LGBs and GBUs sorted, I’ll be a happy camper.
-
hi Tirak
TER? what does TER stand for?(edit) sorry i read the marine article you posted. Triple ejector rack TER!
yes a triple load of lgbs under each wing would be nice
looks like only mavericks have TER in mod so far
maybe this should be added to the update also.TER mean Triple Ejector Rack
-
-
I’m having some trouble with the hardpoint editor and I’m hoping someone can help. I’ve edited the Harrier to carry the Litening pod centerline, and bumped up the GBU-12/B load up to 2 from one. However, all the hardpoints on the right wing load backwards, that is the two bombs are positioned in such a way that the upper bomb on the TER is towards the fuselage, instead of away. On the Mavericks, it’s happening on the Left wing. Any way to fix that?
-
Any way to fix that?
Most likely a bmsrack.dat or rack.dat issue with the type of pylon used.
I wouldn’t recommend messing with them unless your adept at deciphering!!!
C9
-
I’m having some trouble with the hardpoint editor and I’m hoping someone can help. I’ve edited the Harrier to carry the Litening pod centerline, and bumped up the GBU-12/B load up to 2 from one. However, all the hardpoints on the right wing load backwards, that is the two bombs are positioned in such a way that the upper bomb on the TER is towards the fuselage, instead of away. On the Mavericks, it’s happening on the Left wing. Any way to fix that?
If BMS is only allowing you to load 2 stations on a TER on the inboard pylons, I have a strong suspicion they have that correct…and personally, I wouldn’t monkey with BMS on that. Probability is that your mod is mucking up the release sequence for the entire loadout, and that’s why you’re having additional problems with other weapons. I think you’re ok with the CL Litening, though - as it’s not a “weapon”.
-
If BMS is only allowing you to load 2 stations on a TER on the inboard pylons, I have a strong suspicion they have that correct…and personally, I wouldn’t monkey with BMS on that. Probability is that your mod is mucking up the release sequence for the entire loadout, and that’s why you’re having additional problems with other weapons. I think you’re ok with the CL Litening, though - as it’s not a “weapon”.
That’s not what I mean. So the GBU-12 is mounted on a TER, but you only mount 2 GBU-12s on the rack. The problem I’m having is that on the individual TER, the bombs are loading wrong.
If this is the TER -_- and = is the aircraft and + is bombs
It should load +±=-++ (or in long form +±|+±|=|-++|-++)
What it actually loads as: -++=-++ (-++|-++|=|-++|-++)That is consistent across all 4 wing hardpoints, and it’s the reverse with Mavericks +±=+±
-
No, I get what you mean. What I mean is that the mod you did to get that loading may have had an effect with other portions of the BMS software because it expects a certain defined loadout table/sequence for all TER loaded munitions in order to feed the coded release sequence order, and once you load one out of expectation then it goes bonkers trying to figure out what the next one should be - and this is why you’re seeing a reverse of the situation between the two stores.
-
-
-
ok well point i want to touch on
1. There will not be any TERS for LGBS Because im following real world load outs as described by wikipedia and multiple other sources for the Harrier II +. Howeveeeeeeeer!!! i do have my doubts about the sources because i have seen a Triple Ejector Rack being used for mk-80’s
2. Like i Stated in the how to setup read me file; If it does happen to break Multiplayer because (a) my mod is complete shit (b) Or because the person hosting the game does not have the same files as you do. Then you should have made a back up folder with all the files that are being replaced -
2. Like i Stated in the how to setup read me file; If it does happen to break Multiplayer because (a) my mod is complete shit
No truer words have ever been spoken. HAHAHAHA
(b) Or because the person hosting the game does not have the same files as you do. Then you should have made a back up folder with all the files that are being replaced
Agreed!!!
C9
-
This post is deleted! -
ok well point i want to touch on
1. There will not be any TERS for LGBS Because im following real world load outs as described by wikipedia and multiple other sources for the Harrier II +. Howeveeeeeeeer!!! i do have my doubts about the sources because i have seen a Triple Ejector Rack being used for mk-80’s
http://www.naval-technology.com/news/newsusmc-flies-first-bru-70a-rack-equipped-av-8b-harrier-against-is-4525993
http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.NAVAIRNewsStory&id=5852As of this 2015 article, DITERs seem to be an option for the Harrier, giving them LJDAM support.
This article in Spanish references GBU-12s with the BRU-70A, though I can’t verify the exact contents of the article since I don’t speak Spanish.
http://www.defensa.com/frontend/defensa/harrier-armada-espanola-recibiran-nuevos-soportes-para-emplear-6-vn14620-vst154 -
Or at the very least the ability to mount 2 LGBs on the TERs like the F-16 does. Combined with the centerline TGP, that puts our AV-8Bs up to 8 LGBs for strike missions. It’s a shame they only tested the Brimstone on the GR9, so no chance of that coming over for the 18 Brimstone loadout, but if we get the LGBs and GBUs sorted, I’ll be a happy camper.
I like 2 sets of 3 bombs on inner pylons then 2 sets of one on outer and litnin on fuselage
The brimstones might not be realistic but i add those in groups of 4 just for fun tank runs.realism isnt known to me.but i remember the GR9 from FF6 was set up something like this.