Why not make an in depth Tutorial for the simulator ?
-
give the PC-21 ab initio aircraft a 6 pack, and maybe a cut down HUD, and the T-38 its own avionics, which are not so dissimilar to the F-16 anyway. Then training could follow the same aircraft as the prototype, through UPT into IQT
-
Would be awesome. Would add a ton of realism for VFWs too.
-
What sims do you suggest Iād start with ?
-
BMS but be prepared to set a side a large chunk of your spare time to learn it
-
We considered training Aircraft in the past, and i love the idea as well, but it never sticked
my choice was the korean T-50, close to F-16 but maybe a bit too fast for training. A prop is definitely out of the question, because of the avionics (and engine) F-16 philosophy of BMS
and indeed, that would be a VFW dreamThere was and the interactive training missions for Korea. Limited though but better than nothing.
If they were more interactive would be better.
Are they still active?they didnāt work. they were buggy as hell and more frustrating than anything else. I tried them all before starting the trining manual project. the scripts power we had back in these days were very limited and the guy who did them spend an awful lot of time on them for poor results, thatās why I decided to drop completely that concept.
-
It would be cool if some form of basic flight training could be incorporated into BMS for the true newbies to flying because ā¦ you donāt even know how to fly a basic traffic pattern.
For military flying fundamentals:
ā¦:\Falcon BMS 4.33\Docs\Operational Manuals
T-38C FLYING FUNDAMENTALS - Air Force Manual 11-251 Vol1.pdf
For combat fundamentals:
T-38C INTRODUCTION TO FIGHTER FUNDAMENTALS - AETC Tactics, Techniques And Procedures 11-1.pdf
-
I expect someday Kawasaki T-4, Alpha-Jet E and maybe M-346.
-
@Red:
they didnāt work. they were buggy as hell and more frustrating than anything else. I tried them all before starting the trining manual project. the scripts power we had back in these days were very limited and the guy who did them spend an awful lot of time on them for poor results, thatās why I decided to drop completely that concept.
Another idea for the āff [sic] you could have one thing in the next updateā threadā¦ extending BMS through a LUA or Python interpreter
@Chu: If you decide to stick with BMS (and it will be very rewarding and I see absolutely no reason why you shouldnāt if you adore the F-16 as much as you say you do), check out alternative head tracking solutions (EDtracker, delanclip etc.) which can be had for a fraction of the cost of TrackIR while at the same time featuring superior build quality.
All the best, Uwe
-
I have no intention of giving it up but iām definitely gonna push it back until i can actually understand anything. Iām not really one to make progress via reading, I canāt recall a time where manual helped me with anything. It feels like school, which isnāt something I handle very well. Even though the subject is something Iāve liked ever since i was a little kid.
-
This is the issue, is that it very much is school. I can sympathise, in that I have issues with some learning formats too. For me though, its hard to empathise, because reading manuals is probably one of my better learning modes.
You might have some luck asking for help on the Falcon Lounge discord server. Reading manuals doesnt work so well for many as a primary learning tool. You might have more luck with verbal tutoring, or something else more interactive than a manual.
-
Chu - go here and look at these videos - you might want to make notes or have these tutorials running on a separate tablet or other suitable device so you can run BMS and watch these at the same time pausing one or the other as required.
-
Am I the only one who sees an issue that someone out there has found this sim, shown interest, asked for help, made a rather valid suggestion (Because a lot of people have agreed with or championed the idea), and then the thread has turned into people telling him to go fly another sim because this one is too hard for him? Thatās not a good way to build a community. The sim is hard to learn, nobody argues that. But it is by no means impossible to learn without flying some other sim first. In fact itās not even that hard to learn without flying something else first, as long you understand it takes time. There is so much negativity in this thread itās ridiculous.
Yes, it takes time to learn this sim. No, you will not be an ACE in the skies before the New Year. However, it will NOT take you 2 years to be able to fly effectively if you put in a little effort. Yes, it is very helpful to read the manuals first. No, it is not REQUIRED to do so. Many people, myself included, learned the sim with very little reading in the manuals except when I wanted to look something up. Do NOT go fly another sim expecting to come back here and have an easier timeā¦ few if any can offer any kind of comparable depth or complexity in simple tasks such as engine start. If you are unfamiliar with flight dynamics or sims, it might be helpful for the first few times to fly without the advanced flight modelāWhich I think would be a good idea for a training jet. An F-16 with no AFM, for complete beginners, just to get the concept of engine start, taxi, and takeoff. A simple disclaimer in the Training Manual that states as much would be sufficient to ensure the student knows it will get harder going forward.
@OP:
Read the section on engine start. Twice. Then follow it in the sim to get the aircraft started. Taxiā¦Takeoffā¦fly around for a bitā¦attempt to land. Do that 3 or 4 times and you will be 50% of the way into your training, and gain all the experience you could hope to gather from flying around in another sim. From there, follow the training manuals and missions. When they are done, start a campaign and have fun learning the intricacies of everything else. Thatās really all you need. There will be things you donāt understand. Search for them in the manuals. There will still be things you donāt understandā¦search the forums. There will STILL be things you donāt understandā¦ask questions in the forums. Even thenā¦ there will be things you donāt understandā¦experiment in the airplane. -
There is so much negativity in this thread itās ridiculous
I see 13 pages of recurring complaining rather than learning.
Supportive versus spoon-feeding.
-
I disagree. He said repeatedly he didnāt want to give up on the sim. He just needs a little help getting started. Which is understandable for people whoās only experience in flight sims is something like Ace Combat 7ā¦ Regardless there are better ways to be supportive than to mock someone for asking for help, calling it spoon feeding, or telling them to go fly somewhere else. Thatās just my personal opinion. And itās a recurring issue with new players, or these threads wouldnāt get 1500+ views every time one gets started, so there is obviously some validity in the complaint/request.
But thatās the kind of negativity Iām talking about. I would say itās just as hard to learn this sim as it is for a teenager to learn to drive, just with less consequences. Nobody calls it spoon feeding when the teenager asks for driving lessons? Or expects them to go pass a test by reading a book and never getting a lesson? Itās complex with a lot of moving parts. Just because some of us have been doing it for years, doesnāt mean it isnāt still extremely confusing for new people.
-
Am I the only one who sees an issue that someone out there has found this sim, shown interest, asked for help, made a rather valid suggestion (Because a lot of people have agreed with or championed the idea), and then the thread has turned into people telling him to go fly another sim because this one is too hard for him? Thatās not a good way to build a community. The sim is hard to learn, nobody argues that. But it is by no means impossible to learn without flying some other sim first. In fact itās not even that hard to learn without flying something else first, as long you understand it takes time. There is so much negativity in this thread itās ridiculous.
Yes, it takes time to learn this sim. No, you will not be an ACE in the skies before the New Year. However, it will NOT take you 2 years to be able to fly effectively if you put in a little effort. Yes, it is very helpful to read the manuals first. No, it is not REQUIRED to do so. Many people, myself included, learned the sim with very little reading in the manuals except when I wanted to look something up. Do NOT go fly another sim expecting to come back here and have an easier timeā¦ few if any can offer any kind of comparable depth or complexity in simple tasks such as engine start. If you are unfamiliar with flight dynamics or sims, it might be helpful for the first few times to fly without the advanced flight modelāWhich I think would be a good idea for a training jet. An F-16 with no AFM, for complete beginners, just to get the concept of engine start, taxi, and takeoff. A simple disclaimer in the Training Manual that states as much would be sufficient to ensure the student knows it will get harder going forward.
@OP:
Read the section on engine start. Twice. Then follow it in the sim to get the aircraft started. Taxiā¦Takeoffā¦fly around for a bitā¦attempt to land. Do that 3 or 4 times and you will be 50% of the way into your training, and gain all the experience you could hope to gather from flying around in another sim. From there, follow the training manuals and missions. When they are done, start a campaign and have fun learning the intricacies of everything else. Thatās really all you need. There will be things you donāt understand. Search for them in the manuals. There will still be things you donāt understandā¦search the forums. There will STILL be things you donāt understandā¦ask questions in the forums. Even thenā¦ there will be things you donāt understandā¦experiment in the airplane.I disagree - read my post just above yours #125
-
Always remember too
there are a dozen complaining/whining but hundreths didnāt need any guidance and found their way on their own - these do not complain and are unheard of
we hardly see post saying nothing but āI just enjoy BMSā -
@Red:
there are a dozen complaining/whining but hundreths didnāt need any guidance and found their way on their own - these do not complain and are unheard of
we hardly see post saying nothing but āI just enjoy BMSāYep, BMS is self-vetting.
Not our fault if a person cant or wont read the plethura of excellent documentation.
-
Oh, I thought it was a game, made for people to enjoy. I hadnāt realized it was a status symbol which required or signified exclusivity.
No offense to RD, but I think the AD guys have better docs and trainingā¦ maybe the AF can save some money by eliminating training programs and instructors in lieu of simply reading the TOs and AFIs. Iāll pass the suggestion on to my boss.
-
I donāt really think itās complaining so much but the op has asked the same thing over and over and gotten many diverse answers and still continues. If he opened the manuals then came back with specific questions then itād be different.
-
Mortesil
Just out of interest - How did you learn to fly BMS