AIDC FCK-1 Ching Kuo
-
enough polygons. enough model. no more stres and strech. I will keep in my archive for new personal update.
-
enough polygons. enough model. no more stres and strech. I will keep in my archive for new personal update.
Glad you enjoy the 10+year-old low-polys.
The low-polys are built to help tiding over the looong waiting time.
Once hi-quality models available to the community, I’ll delete and update the lod zip. -
Since 10 years yea, many models gone trashcan. But some model really enough and still usable.
For me even with enough vga card or pc, if just one of model meaningless hi-poly and 10-30mb LOL.
Believe me stupity meaningless source using and will never help Bms future I think.
YES. really modeler doing good and I feel respect, some model true looking good.
But best way is optimize using source for me. Falcon graphic engine is old and total performance really low.
But for me still provide best war scene with war engine…
forexample; AV8b Harrier really great job, optimize Polygon with nice Cockpit. I wanna tell, that’s all.
meanwhile,
I tried to fly with LOMAC earlier. Compared to those years, the predominant LOMAC graphics were overwhelmingly better,
but the scenario and the war engine are rubbish. But the “lua” file format gave much to LOMAC.
But if I know why, Falcon Simulator is very attractive to me.
I’m defending the Falcon simulator and I always look forward to doing a good job. I like. -
Hello!
Hardwork is in progress on payload and Ching Kuo’s texture!
We are starting to have something really good.
It’s a good idea to have low poly models. But, as a 3D modeler, I need to think for the next ten years. So, my models are designed to be still acceptable in ten years.
This is the reason why I appreciate to hardoword on details.
You did a really great job on your Ching Kuo Novalogin !
As you can see, I already did Wan Chien missile, and 275 gal fuel tanks. I will follow with Tien Chien I and II, and I will finish with Hsuing Feng II.
By the way, I have some documentation which states that Xiong Ying (FCK-1C/D) can carry Hsuing Feng III missile. I was wondering if some of you have some proof of an integration? I was said that it shall be carried on centerline pylon.
Also, I have no evidence that a TGP was ever integrated on FCK-1. Can anyone of you confirm it?
Thank you very much for your kind support,
Kindly yours,
Radium
-
Beautiful work. Again.
-
Looking good Radium, I really admire the speed and quality you achieve in your work.
Do you or anyone from the BMS team plan any work on the FCK-1 cockpit? The panels and general layout are pretty similar with the F-16, just missing the canopy frame.
-
Looking good Radium, I really admire the speed and quality you achieve in your work.
Do you or anyone from the BMS team plan any work on the FCK-1 cockpit? The panels and general layout are pretty similar with the F-16, just missing the canopy frame.
Hello!
I plan to adjust F-16 cockpit to have something close to FCK-1!
Cheers,
Radium
-
Re: Hsuing Feng III, I can only find ship and trailer based launch platforms…
-
Hi, Radium
great work,and don’t forget spoiler
I can’t wait fly F-CK-1~~~~
and 經國 is wrong
-
I’m greatly thanks to your work !!, and as far as I know there is no TGP load in F-CK-1.
And is there any guy who model aerodynamic/propulsion characteristics?
-
Hi, Radium
great work,and don’t forget spoiler
I can’t wait fly F-CK-1~~~~
and 經國 is wrong
Hello !
You are right, I was planning to make them I totally forgot to make it. I also did correction for Ching Kuo markings.
Thank you very much for your report !
Xei xei !
Today is my airsoft game day, si, no WIP today !
I did your corrections before leaving to airsoft field !
I’m greatly thanks to your work !!, and as far as I know there is no TGP load in F-CK-1.
And is there any guy who model aerodynamic/propulsion characteristics?
We have a great flight dynamics guy in the team, I trust his work ! Maybe he will reply something
Cheers,
Radium
-
no HF-III and TGP for FCK-1.
BTW please adjust slot positions, just too close to fuselage.
-
no HF-III and TGP for FCK-1.
BTW please adjust slot positions, just too close to fuselage.
Thank you ver much for your details!
It’s been twice you made me correct my pylons! Shall I take you credit you as pylon manager?
Thank you very, very much cctw, it’s a pleasure to receive your help and critics.
Cheers,
Radium
-
Way too late to comment on this, and the model is wonderful regardless, but kouzi’s second shot down shows what I’ve been thinking to be an issue to be correct:
1. The canopy of your model retains a constant curvature, which is not quite right. So, from the sides at a downward angle, you see the front canopy porking out. The constant curvature also results in a really pointy front to the forward windscreen.
2. Therefore, the canopy does not have a constant curvature - the front canopy is more like a tapered tube blending into the fuselage, rather than a curving one. So, this almost straight profile to the front canopy, blending into the forward fuselage, will now make a curve, rather than a point. You also won’t have the “porking out” at the sides with a straight profile.
So, should the day ever come you ever decide to tweak the geometry, I think you could fix the issue. Until then, the model is wonderful.
-
Way too late to comment on this, and the model is wonderful regardless, but kouzi’s second shot down shows what I’ve been thinking to be an issue to be correct:
1. The canopy of your model retains a constant curvature, which is not quite right. So, from the sides at a downward angle, you see the front canopy porking out. The constant curvature also results in a really pointy front to the forward windscreen.
2. Therefore, the canopy does not have a constant curvature - the front canopy is more like a tapered tube blending into the fuselage, rather than a curving one. So, this almost straight profile to the front canopy, blending into the forward fuselage, will now make a curve, rather than a point. You also won’t have the “porking out” at the sides with a straight profile.
So, should the day ever come you ever decide to tweak the geometry, I think you could fix the issue. Until then, the model is wonderful.
OK, thank you for the report. I’ll correct that tomorrow. I thought I did it Well, but I will check carefully canopy angles. It’s almost nothing to correct.
Thank you !
Radium
-
Still work in progress… but enough to have fun with:
-
-
-
It’s a real beauty, great work Radium!
All the best, Uwe
-
It’s a real beauty, great work Radium!
All the best, Uwe
Thank you!!!
But…
-
Topolo for flight dynamics
-
Switch for DB integration
-
Dee-Jay for data
-
Mav JP for advanced flight dynamics
-
Bad Boy for campaign management
-
ccc1tw for documentation and translation
-
JOKER_duke for documentation
-
all of those who gave their kind support !
Thanks you so much everybody!
-