Sukhoi Su-34
-
Radium my friend, my brother ! Your work is simply like art. I truly welcome any of your 3D models to the BMS world. I am very glad that you are up to that complex task !
Keep going my brother !
-
Whoah what a detail!!!
-
-
-
-
Ok, new F-16 model confirmed
No, I just meant, are you referring to stock BMS F-16 or Tomcatz one, or Janhas one ?
Also, what is HL.3 ? Half Life 3 ?
-
What are you refering to ?
That the landing gear of the Su-34 is much more detailed than the current F-16 model in BMS4.34.
-
That the landing gear of the Su-34 is much more detailed than the current F-16 model in BMS4.34.
Yes, then ?
-
I think the molniās question is: will 4.35ās(?) Su-34 be more detailed than 4.35ās F-16?
Itās reasonable question cause level of details of that gear is outstanding and cannot be compare to nothing we already have seen in current or previous iterations.
-
Yes, then ?
I just wondered that a literally non used plane will (?) have better model than the no.1 flyable plane. Strange.
-
I just wondered that a literally non used plane will (?) have better model than the no.1 flyable plane. Strange.
Most of what I do is strange for you right ?
-
-
I think the molniās question is: will 4.35ās(?) Su-34 be more detailed than 4.35ās F-16?
Itās reasonable question cause level of details of that gear is outstanding and cannot be compare to nothing we already have seen in current or previous iterations.
IF we have do (maybe someday?) push some limits further away, it is smarter to do it first on ānon primaryā aircraft. So all the experience gained will be more benefit for āprimaryā stuff. So to me, it makes perfect sens.
-
I just wondered that a literally non used plane will (?) have better model than the no.1 flyable plane. Strange.
āLife is Strangeā, dear Molniā¦ you stated that yourself, as seems
With best regards.
-
IF we have do (maybe someday?) push some limits further away, it is smarter to do it first on ānon primaryā aircraft. So all the experience gained will be more benefit for āprimaryā stuff. So to me, it makes perfect sens.
I wonder if/when BMS 3D models start to use rumored multiple-hibox feature. Improved damage visuals (IL2 style) would be really nice to have.
-
IF we have do (maybe someday?) push some limits further away, it is smarter to do it first on ānon primaryā aircraft. So all the experience gained will be more benefit for āprimaryā stuff. So to me, it makes perfect sens.
From this POV I understand the function of this plane.
-
Oh ā¦ there is no āfunctionā to the plane except that it particularly pleases Jp and Radium.
I just personally think it is indeed better to work from the ālowestā to the āhighestā (on that particular cases).
-
-
From this POV I understand the function of this plane.
Well, Iād like people to listen exactly what I said. If not, I have no reason to write here anymore.
1. Our current model of F-16 is almost 15 years old.
2. Even it is a really beautiful model (for me the most accurate on BMS and in all simulation, even DCS), it barely matches what is acceptable now, in term of technology.
3. There is a working doctrine in Industry which is called ācontinuous improvementā.
4. If we donāt follow it, you will always have outdated resources and processes.
5. Then, people will always claim that our database is old looking.
6. I think that many people do not mind having Flight Simulator 98 generation models in their campaigns or DB. I feel ashamed to consider that this is something normal, and take it as my own responsibility to change it. Even this is not a competition, I donāt want to blush when I see what DCS can graphically provide. Despite having an highly limited combat interest, DCS is thousand of lightyears forward in term of graphical realism for tactical objects (aircraft, ships and vehicles).
7. So, my idea is this one : never feel happy with what we have, and look forward to see whatās next, to continuously improve our favorite software. My standard is whatās next. Not about a glorious past. Some like history, I like future.
10. If you have another way to think, iām fine with it. But here is my way of deploying my passion into BMS. Some will complain, some will be happy, I just donāt mind, because I feel Iām doing it right. And I will keep telling you that Iām going in the path that I feel to be the right one. If dev team wants to fire me because of this; Iām fine with it. They just have to ask me for it, I will leave without any question. But I will never trade my convictions.
11. Last but not least : this is my very own point of view. I donāt intend that Iām the best one, Iām just an humble and simple 3D modeler with one ideal : to have the best DB for my favorite software I never play with, to enjoy creating.
Regards and peacefully yours,
Radium
-
Well, Iād like people to listen exactly what I said. If not, I have no reason to write here anymore.
1. Our current model of F-16 is almost 15 years old.
2. Even its a really beautiful model (for me the most accurate on BMS and in all simulation, even DCS), it barely matches what is acceptable now, in term of technology.
3. There is a working doctrine in Industry which is called ācontinuous improvementā.
4. If we donāt follow it, you will always have outdated resources and processes.
5. Then, people will always claim that our database is old looking.
6. I think that many people do not mind having Flight Simulator 98 generation models in their campaigns or DB. I feel ashamed to consider that this is something normal, and take it as my own responsibility to change it. Even this is not a competition, I donāt want to blush when I see what DCS can graphically provide. Despite having an highly limited combat interest, DCS is thousand of lightyears forward in term of graphical realism for tactical objects (aircraft, ships and vehicles).
7. So, my idea is this one : never feel happy with what we have, and look forward to see whatās next, to continuously improve our favorite software. My standard is whatās next. Not about a glorious past. Some like history, I like future.
10. If you have another way to think, iām fine with it. But here is my way of deploying my passion into BMS. Some will complain, some will be happy, I just donāt mind, because I feel Iām doing it right. And I will keep telling you that Iām going in the path that I feel to be the right one. If dev team wants to fire me because of this; Iām fine with it. They just have to ask me for it, I will leave without any question. But I will never trade my convictions.
11. Last but not least : this is my very own point of view. I donāt intend that Iām the best one, Iām just an humble and simple 3D modeler with one ideal : to have the best DB for my favorite software I never play with, to enjoy creating.
Regards and peacefully yours,
Radium
Mannnn keep working and ignore the bad vibes, your work is amazing!!!