Falcon BMS 4.35 U1 Wishlist
-
F-15E/C cockpit & flight model please. Hotspots in the 3D cockpit but non is active
-
1.000.000$
-
even more detailed exterior lighting and oxygen system
-
Please make HAD a bit more kind. Having to triangulate is 100% fine, but having to load HARMs and then create a markpoint to get a TGP look on that emitter is just mean.
My suggestion is that selecting an emitter on HAD would move the SPI to the (approximated) emitter position, including all other sensors (just like TMS up with any other SOI would), even if no HARMs are loaded.I mean, HAD is made up anyways and this change wouldn’t make it less plausible. Or do you know that HAD really can’t be used to cue other sensors IRL?
It would be pretty neat too to have a TGT SEP button for HAD or at least . When EWR and FCR stand pretty much right on top of each other (SA-4 in the training mission), selecting the right one is pure luck.
When HARM in HAD or POS mode is selected and no missile is handed off, the TD box, the target locator line and the tadpole are gone. is this intended?
-
Please make HAD a bit more kind. Having to triangulate is 100% fine, but having to load HARMs and then create a markpoint to get a TGP look on that emitter is just mean.
My suggestion is that selecting an emitter on HAD would move the SPI to the (approximated) emitter position, including all other sensors (just like TMS up with any other SOI would), even if no HARMs are loaded.I mean, HAD is made up anyways and this change wouldn’t make it less plausible. Or do you know that HAD really can’t be used to cue other sensors IRL?
It would be pretty neat too to have a TGT SEP button for HAD or at least . When EWR and FCR stand pretty much right on top of each other (SA-4 in the training mission), selecting the right one is pure luck.
When HARM in HAD or POS mode is selected and no missile is handed off, the TD box, the target locator line and the tadpole are gone. is this intended?
maybe i am not informed correctly, or maybe i missed one part, after all I made up the whole HAD ROFLMAO
-
even more detailed exterior lighting
good idea , the real ext light system is actually VERY complex on the last blocks
-
APKWS would be super awesome, BTW.
-
Please make HAD a bit more kind. Having to triangulate is 100% fine, but having to load HARMs and then create a markpoint to get a TGP look on that emitter is just mean.
My suggestion is that selecting an emitter on HAD would move the SPI to the (approximated) emitter position, including all other sensors (just like TMS up with any other SOI would), even if no HARMs are loaded.I mean, HAD is made up anyways and this change wouldn’t make it less plausible. Or do you know that HAD really can’t be used to cue other sensors IRL?
It would be pretty neat too to have a TGT SEP button for HAD or at least . When EWR and FCR stand pretty much right on top of each other (SA-4 in the training mission), selecting the right one is pure luck.
When HARM in HAD or POS mode is selected and no missile is handed off, the TD box, the target locator line and the tadpole are gone. is this intended?
HTS is supposed to be able to cue other sensors, and is supposed to allow PGM employment against stationary emitters. Like, JDAMs from another Link 16 platform, for instance.
What makes you say the HAD is made up?
-
HTS is supposed to be able to cue other sensors, and is supposed to allow PGM employment against stationary emitters. Like, JDAMs from another Link 16 platform, for instance.
What makes you say the HAD is made up?
@TO-BMS1F-16CM-34-1-1:
Note also: AN/ASQ-213 HARM Targeting System (HTS) implementation in BMS is merely a representation of reality.
The real system is highly classified and may work differently.So I thought that the dev team is just guessing how HAD might work and trying to make something plausible. Or is it known how the real HAD MFD page and HUD symbology look like?
-
So I thought that the dev team is just guessing how HAD might work and trying to make something plausible. Or is it known how the real HAD MFD page and HUD symbology look like?
It’s all guessed
-
16:9 Start menu please…
-
-
-
-
My wish is that you guys at the dev team take a break and enjoy your family during the holidays.
-
UI can be set full screen.
He probably wants a higher resolution. That would be nice, especially for recon, but to me it’s a really low priority thing. There are many other things that are more important.
-
My wish is that you guys at the dev team take a break and enjoy your family during the holidays.
+1
-
He probably wants a higher resolution. That would be nice, especially for recon, but to me it’s a really low priority thing. There are many other things that are more important.
That is a total UI rewrite from scratch.
Not gonna happen soon unfortunately. -
AAR auto pilot!:D
-