AAR Orgy - BLUE force
-
A-4E aggressor - AAR is ok but there is a graphic problem, not seem to be connected correctly -
A-4E PTM got the same problem as A-4E, not able to connect to the busket, so he got the same treatment from me :-). This model seem to make a big problem on the next waiting aircrafts, details ahead -
A-4SU as oppose to those A-4E that tried to connect, this model do not try even to connect, just stay at its place next to the tanker, so yeh, had to shoot him down -
waiting aircrafts -
-
continued . . .
after the A-4SU got out of the way, the waiting aircrafts just continued to wait with no action.
Those models that had problem refueling must be “confusing” the AAR system and cuase problems to the next aircrafts in line.So to end this mission with a blast i used the MD mode of the -120B, who was the “lucky winner” ? . . . -
Next update will be with the “B’s & C’s” models
-
@regev
Who says “fuel-wars” are a future thing??!!!btw, those are not “graphical problems” , it is an easy fix in acdata… just need to do it - and then re-test - all of them - easy but lot of “testing”
problem is , if you had your time fixing it … then new BMS/or Theatre update came along with tons of new/corrected stuff - but unfortunately with old “bugs” - not fixed stuff , remained
…and then you need to do (fix) it all over and over again … eeeehhhh… noLet THEM fix it ones for all;. since like this it is pointless - spend more time in fixing then flying - I’m tired of fixing - I have a house to fix … and then do it all over again. - I just don’t need another thousand items on my mind… but fuck, all engineers are of fixing nature
Fix ain’t “fix” if it isn’t done properly … then it is fix of fix of fix of fix…
Awww, fuckit , Call Mr. Fixit -
@white_fang this topic i started is mostly my interest in to see how every aircraft model behave in AAR.
I tested maybe 10% of the availble models and i found lots of problems, the ones that causes the AAR to stop its operating are the ones that really matters and i hope that DEV team will check them out.
The “graphical” problem are not that serious but i share anyway, maybe somebody can have a use in this knowledge.
Cheers
-
Next update : remaining A’s models
A-6E, A-7E, AV-8B, AV-8B+ - All function ok in AAR
-
The B’s -
B1-B & B-2A - AAR ok
B-52G - AAR ok but graphically its not connected . . .
B-52H - AAR ok
-
The C’s -
C-130H, C-141B, C-17, C-5, CF-188A - AAR ok
The C-160R NG (tanker) is the only c-160 that has AAR option (there are more 3 sub types of the C-160).
The problem with the C-160R NG is that its max speed is so low, 214kts/100% power . . . so it can not catch the kc-10 that its low AAR speed is 230kts.
So this type is stalling the next waiting aircrafts in line to refuel.
I will test it in the future with the kc-130 & C-160R NG (in tanker role) - -
-
Next update : the E’s (no D’s)
E-2C, E-3A, E-8C, EA-18G, EA-18G (RAAF), EA-6B, EF-111A, EF-18M, Eurofighter - all AAR ok (E-2C & Eurofighter got a graphical issue in the connection point) -
1st time the tanker used its central refueling basket . . .
-
Next update : the F’s (Part 1)
F104C, F-111E, F-111F, F-117, F-14A, F-14A AGR, F-14B,F-14D - all AAR ok
(F-104DJ, F-104G, F-104J - don’t have AAR capability)
-
@white_fang said: Awww, fuckit , Call Mr. Fixit
I actually gave him a call.
He asked: “You a friend of White Fang?”
I said: “I know him.”
Dude immediately hung up.
Now all of my calls go directly to voice message… -
@white_fang said: Awww, fuckit , Call Mr. Fixit
I actually gave him a call.
He asked: “You a friend of White Fang?”
I said: “I know him.”
Dude immediately hung up.
Now all of my calls go directly to voice message…Really?
He sucks.
But you would have been better to mind carefully your current main business on your side, though.So may this be the correct definition for a draw, perhaps?
With best understanding regards.
-
Hello,
here, IAS is not really relevant.
At 16926ft, an IAS of 214kts means a TAS of 275kt and mach 0.4, which is totally ok.
It’s slow for a combat aircraft, but fully realistic.
Best regards,
Radium
-
Next update : the F’s (Part 2) - F-15’s
F-15A, F-15C, F-15C AGR, F-15C IAF, F-15CJ, F-15D, F-15DJ, F-15E-220, F-15E-229, F-15I, F-15K - All AAR OK.
F-15A, F-15D & F-15DJ have problems at the connection point, the boom is too deep (that what she said . . .) ,i circled it in red circle.
-
(BMS updated to 4.36U2)
Next update : the F’s (Part 3) - F-16A & F-16B
F-16A-15, F-16-15 IAF, F-16AM(BAC, RDAF, RJAF, RNAF, RNoAF), F-16B, F-16B IAF - all AAR ok
-
-
@regev
Just about the Vipers: “ok” is a diminutive, mate, and you are until too modest, to me.
“Perfect!” may sound more adequate… no other sim can compare to ours, amd here is clear why.Nice and self-explicative shots them all, you are skilled in this too, by the way. So thanks a lot for sharing.
With best compliments and regards.
-
(BMS 4.36U2)
Next update : the F’s (Part 4) - F-16C&D Blocks 25-32
F-16C-25, F-16C-30, F-16C-30 18AS, F-16C-30 IAF, F-16C-32, F-16C-32 64AS, F-16C-32 EAF, F-16D-30 IAF - all AAR ok
F-16D-30 IAF - the boom is too deep . . .
F-16C-32 ROKAF - for some reason the aircraft never reached the refuling area and no communication between him and the tanker. I will check it again and report. -
@regev
I can’t recall id I told this before, or not.
I love particulars… thanks a lot for this too, dear mate.With best regards.
-
-
@regev
Sure thing that, mate, especially if you keep on making shots as nice as you are currently doing.With best compliments again and regards.