Sukhoi Su-27/Su-33/Su-35/Su-30 Shenyang J-11/J-15
-
Hello,
I just remember this issue… we solved it in the past.
I will make a fix tonight
Radium
-
@Radium It looks to be an issue with the left wingtip. If I add a right ECM pod, then the rail stays on the left and the pod shows up on the right. If I add a left ECM pod, the rail disappears on the left and the rail on the right stays visible. If I add them both, the pod shows up on the right and the rail disappears on the left.
Could it be an issue with the switch on the left side wingtip?
-
@cougar56th
I’ve the fix (Radium sent it to me and I’ve validate it this morning), I will commit it as soon as possible (may be not this week, but my target is to create the pull request next Thursday or before) -
-
@Radium said in Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35 Shenyang J-11/J-15/J-16:
Hello,
I am very happy to post v1.2 that corrects the wingtip racks issues.
Hope this will work fine for you ! (It was tested by Topolo, it works by him).
Radium
Good Friday it is
Youre doing gods work, @Radium
-
Hello gentlemen !
Today, I am happy to post v1.3.
I really like J-11, it was a big missing in KTO and the render is really convincing !
This package includes :
- Update of wingtip pylon Y position
- Update of all main texture files to correct a wrong shadow
- Update of J-11 livery to smooth sharp linkings between uvw and Vray reshot.
Hope you will enjoy it !
Radium
-
@Radium Very good
-
Hello !
Just to let you know that v1.3 is now stable enough, and I close Su-27 topîc.
Thank you everyone !
Radium
-
@Radium said in Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35 Shenyang J-11/J-15/J-16:
Hello !
Just to let you know that v1.3 is now stable enough, and I close Su-27 topîc.
Thank you everyone !
Radium
What about Su-30/J-16 as it says in the thread title? Would be good to finish those.
-
@Hubert3000 Hello,
Su-27/Su-30 and J-16 are different topics.
Nevertheless :
https://forum.falcon-bms.com/post/372942
However, I can give my sources to a serious modeler.
This applies also to Su-34.
Best regards,
Radium
-
Do they get a proper loadout and rack settings?
-
@molnibalage What are you talking about ?
-
@Radium said in Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35 Shenyang J-11/J-15/J-16:
@molnibalage What are you talking about ?
So far in every Falcon version I could see non existing pylon and loadout settings for the red jets. The accurate use of the line 4x and 6x MERs never existed. The LGBs were used on a dual pylon which never existed etc.
-
@molnibalage Regular debate. You will have what we will give you. I will not miss you since I will soon disappear from BMS world as announced.
-
Well you’ve done a great job Radium and added a lot to one of the best flight sims ever made.
Here are some of your guys that will be hanging around for a while lol.
-
@Hubert3000 Hello Hubert,
We didn’t had much chances to exchanges together, but I want to express my big thanks for your screenshots. It’s really pleasant to see that, I really did my best to offer the community some quality assets.
A lot of little mistakes can be found, that’s for sure, but I am very happy if you enjoy them !
Very nice Redfor line up !
Radium
-
@Radium said in Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35 Shenyang J-11/J-15/J-16:
@molnibalage Regular debate. You will have what we will give you. I will not miss you since I will soon disappear from BMS world as announced.
?
I simply do not get your reaction.
I cannot install the pack so I cannot check it.I simply stated if these are still not fixed I could be done.
Nothing else. -
@molnibalage No.
Your statement was :
So far in every Falcon version I could see non existing pylon and loadout settings for the red jets. The accurate use of the line 4x and 6x MERs never existed. The LGBs were used on a dual pylon which never existed etc.
You implied as always that :
- You know everything about Russian and WAPA systems,
- We are doing shit all the time.
- You are free to do what you want with it for your theaters.
- I will not miss this dicks lenght competitions.
Radium
-
@Radium said in Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35 Shenyang J-11/J-15/J-16:
@molnibalage No.
Your statement was :
So far in every Falcon version I could see non existing pylon and loadout settings for the red jets. The accurate use of the line 4x and 6x MERs never existed. The LGBs were used on a dual pylon which never existed etc.
You implied as always that :
- You know everything about Russian and WAPA systems,
- We are doing shit all the time.
- You are free to do what you want with it for your theaters.
- I will not miss this dicks lenght competitions.
Radium
I still do not get your attitude.
You take every comment or simply question about shortcomings or issues as a personal insult. Here was a QUESTION and your reaction was what it was…
Where was not any “dicks lenght competitions” from my side.I’m far far being everything about Russian weapons systems. But I’m a bit tired about the sate that simply a ready to apply changes are not applied since ages…
Even just adding two skins or swap a dat file to another.The point of my comment after 20+ years it would be great to have a solid core DB and not a case where everybody has to play AGAIN and EVERYTIME the DB to have a more or less accurate environment. Which leads to MP incompatibility.
The case is the same just as was in 2007 or anytime.
I open the game and I still see the 3 KAB/station on a pylon what never existed.But it is hard to speak or discuss about anything where first reaction of a QUESTION is just the usual. I know the language barrier can be hard but so hard…???
I simply wished to check the loadout of the planes in the package because if the current ones are used, it could be improved.
-
@molnibalage your bold and snooty attitude brings you there. There is no language barrier just a result of years of haughty communication.
If you want to claim something ask @TOPOLO or @MaxWaldorf .