Sukhoi Su-27/Su-33/Su-35 Shenyang J-11/J-15
-
Hello gentlemen !
Today, I am happy to post v1.3.
I really like J-11, it was a big missing in KTO and the render is really convincing !
This package includes :
- Update of wingtip pylon Y position
- Update of all main texture files to correct a wrong shadow
- Update of J-11 livery to smooth sharp linkings between uvw and Vray reshot.
Hope you will enjoy it !
Radium
-
@Radium Very good
-
Hello !
Just to let you know that v1.3 is now stable enough, and I close Su-27 topîc.
Thank you everyone !
Radium
-
@Radium said in Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35 Shenyang J-11/J-15/J-16:
Hello !
Just to let you know that v1.3 is now stable enough, and I close Su-27 topîc.
Thank you everyone !
Radium
What about Su-30/J-16 as it says in the thread title? Would be good to finish those.
-
@Hubert3000 Hello,
Su-27/Su-30 and J-16 are different topics.
Nevertheless :
https://forum.falcon-bms.com/post/372942
However, I can give my sources to a serious modeler.
This applies also to Su-34.
Best regards,
Radium
-
Do they get a proper loadout and rack settings?
-
@molnibalage What are you talking about ?
-
@Radium said in Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35 Shenyang J-11/J-15/J-16:
@molnibalage What are you talking about ?
So far in every Falcon version I could see non existing pylon and loadout settings for the red jets. The accurate use of the line 4x and 6x MERs never existed. The LGBs were used on a dual pylon which never existed etc.
-
@molnibalage Regular debate. You will have what we will give you. I will not miss you since I will soon disappear from BMS world as announced.
-
Well you’ve done a great job Radium and added a lot to one of the best flight sims ever made.
Here are some of your guys that will be hanging around for a while lol.
-
@Hubert3000 Hello Hubert,
We didn’t had much chances to exchanges together, but I want to express my big thanks for your screenshots. It’s really pleasant to see that, I really did my best to offer the community some quality assets.
A lot of little mistakes can be found, that’s for sure, but I am very happy if you enjoy them !
Very nice Redfor line up !
Radium
-
@Radium said in Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35 Shenyang J-11/J-15/J-16:
@molnibalage Regular debate. You will have what we will give you. I will not miss you since I will soon disappear from BMS world as announced.
?
I simply do not get your reaction.
I cannot install the pack so I cannot check it.I simply stated if these are still not fixed I could be done.
Nothing else. -
@molnibalage No.
Your statement was :
So far in every Falcon version I could see non existing pylon and loadout settings for the red jets. The accurate use of the line 4x and 6x MERs never existed. The LGBs were used on a dual pylon which never existed etc.
You implied as always that :
- You know everything about Russian and WAPA systems,
- We are doing shit all the time.
- You are free to do what you want with it for your theaters.
- I will not miss this dicks lenght competitions.
Radium
-
@Radium said in Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35 Shenyang J-11/J-15/J-16:
@molnibalage No.
Your statement was :
So far in every Falcon version I could see non existing pylon and loadout settings for the red jets. The accurate use of the line 4x and 6x MERs never existed. The LGBs were used on a dual pylon which never existed etc.
You implied as always that :
- You know everything about Russian and WAPA systems,
- We are doing shit all the time.
- You are free to do what you want with it for your theaters.
- I will not miss this dicks lenght competitions.
Radium
I still do not get your attitude.
You take every comment or simply question about shortcomings or issues as a personal insult. Here was a QUESTION and your reaction was what it was…
Where was not any “dicks lenght competitions” from my side.I’m far far being everything about Russian weapons systems. But I’m a bit tired about the sate that simply a ready to apply changes are not applied since ages…
Even just adding two skins or swap a dat file to another.The point of my comment after 20+ years it would be great to have a solid core DB and not a case where everybody has to play AGAIN and EVERYTIME the DB to have a more or less accurate environment. Which leads to MP incompatibility.
The case is the same just as was in 2007 or anytime.
I open the game and I still see the 3 KAB/station on a pylon what never existed.But it is hard to speak or discuss about anything where first reaction of a QUESTION is just the usual. I know the language barrier can be hard but so hard…???
I simply wished to check the loadout of the planes in the package because if the current ones are used, it could be improved.
-
@molnibalage your bold and snooty attitude brings you there. There is no language barrier just a result of years of haughty communication.
If you want to claim something ask @TOPOLO or @MaxWaldorf .
-
@Radium said in Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35 Shenyang J-11/J-15/J-16:
Hello gentlemen !
Today, I am happy to post v1.3.
I really like J-11, it was a big missing in KTO and the render is really convincing !
This package includes :
- Update of wingtip pylon Y position
- Update of all main texture files to correct a wrong shadow
- Update of J-11 livery to smooth sharp linkings between uvw and Vray reshot.
Hope you will enjoy it !
Radium
I’m trying to install your work in Korea DB, but I don’t know what are the parents of pilons, adaters and new GBUs… Could someone do a tutorial of the process to add everything to default DB? thank you so much in advance
-
@Radium said in Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35 Shenyang J-11/J-15/J-16:
@Hubert3000 Hello,
Su-27/Su-30 and J-16 are different topics.
Nevertheless :
https://forum.falcon-bms.com/post/372942
However, I can give my sources to a serious modeler.
This applies also to Su-34.
Best regards,
Radium
TBH I didn’t dare to ask as it’s kinda sensitive topic for most of the artists, but your post kind a encouraged me to do so. If possible, could you consider sharing sources of your models (including ones already released) with the modeler/skinner you trust or the BMS team? I’m asking because Your works are of amazing quality and quality. Applying goodies provided by 4.38 and further releases (PBR and other effects) would let the live up tho their true potential. I think everyone around would love to have your creations in BMS for years, as they are pure joy for the eyes. But without ability to assign new textures/maps it’ll by impossible to adapt them to newer standards or even make them work with new executable (IIRC 4.37.3 may bring more performant 3D model format).
-
Hello,
I will offer my sources to anyone :
- That I personally like and trust
- That can be member or non member of BMS team
- That must not be a part of OFM team and who will never transfer them my source files
- That will always credit a joint work between he/she and I.
Kind regards,
Radium
-
Thank you from the very bottom of my heart. It’s very generous from you as many artists don’t share their sources under no circumstances.
I hope your models will be there for many years, make each BMS user smile and remind that, there’s one fabulous guy out there, which is you. -
Thought this was funny to post…