ITO 1.07.0v Bugs
-
@SammySkycrafts said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
Just to add, I also got wind speeds displayed like this today, aswell as aircraft callsigns (For instance NICKEL11 would be NICKEL 01-Jan
what is your version of ITO ?
i have fixed this issue already and couldn’t replicate it from the hotfix update. -
@vAiCon I used the full installer a couple of days ago, so v1.07.2
-
@RUSHER0600 For 2, it was ITO, not 80’s, though I suspect it may also affect there as I believe the default BMS dat for the A-6E includes no TGP.
Yes, the CMs were loaded as per the indicator, AI was able to use them but human-controlled aircraft cannot, I verified all cmds settings were correct which they were. I have seen this issue a few times in KTO too, it needed a change in the aircraft.dat iirc
-
@SammySkycrafts said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
@vAiCon I used the full installer a couple of days ago, so v1.07.2
check your theater page and check if you see 1.07.2 + hotfix,
if not… then install it … -
@vAiCon Sorry for the late reply…
Doing that fixed it, I assumed this was included with the main download however it appears it wasnt. Thanks for the help!
-
There appears to be an issue with ITO and Mission Commander. If you load up a standard ITO campaign or TE, the database MC uses is for ITO80’s, so makes the file unusable in BMS. I have discovered the cause of this is because MC reads from the theater.lst file. That has ITO80’s at the top, and presumably, MC selects the theater based on the first part of the path. Which for both ITO and ITO80’s is Add-On Israel. Would splitting the theatre be feasible? Or would this be better to be bought up with @Falcas on the MC thread?
https://forum.falcon-bms.com/topic/25437/mc-te-ito-database/
-
@SammySkycrafts Noticed that too recently, I believe the best solution would be an MC update.
-
I’ve got a problem. Campaign crashes every time. In log folder there is text file “ErrorsInCampain.txt”.
~FlightClass 1334th Fighter Flight Squad 201st Fighter Squadron Pilot 0 - Col. Arad still in use! -
@QuantumDream said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
I’ve got a problem. Campaign crashes every time. In log folder there is text file “ErrorsInCampain.txt”.
~FlightClass 1334th Fighter Flight Squad 201st Fighter Squadron Pilot 0 - Col. Arad still in use!ITO or ITO80s?
Which campaign?
Does opening that campaign with MC and fixing/deleting the squadron resolve the issue? -
@RUSHER0600
Im new in BMS. Just played for 2 day. Problem with ITO Red Line campaign. At day 1 about 7:30 game always crashes. -
I’m playing through the training missions and the JDAM popup scenario suggests that there should be loft solutions and pull-up cue. These don’t appear. I’m unsure if this is a bug or an issue with the documentation or if I’m doing something wrong.
-
Problem with ITO Red Line campaign. At day 1 about 7:30 game always crashes.
@vAiCon ?
-
BMS 3.47
ITO 1.07.3Issue: Wingman doing funny stuff, ie, not taking off, or going somewhere else when being cleared for takeoff.
Campaign file attached, Air Interdiction is the mission. Choose runway start. Runway assigned seems to differ everytime i launched the mission. but i had the issue when i was on runway 90, 140
Made a runway start. Wingman was at the holding line. Got clearance from ATC for takeoff. Wingman did a u-turn and strolled off somewhere… in the picture u can see he is still taxi-ing somewhere… I’m on the runway.
Cam File:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1bWmxofzQfcEI-uf3w54iSeYxMUXEOzsS?usp=drive_link -
@555TheBoss yeah the same happened to me once or twice.
-
@555TheBoss said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
BMS 3.47
ITO 1.07.3Issue: Wingman doing funny stuff,
Like this?
-
@vAiCon said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
@VDK said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
SU-22/17 glitch
Guys, the afterburner on Su-22/17 seems to be “invisible” (the AB is ON but there is no visual on the burner).
Same thing with Landing gear and Flaps
will check asap
Did you check it? The problem persist with u3
Thanks!
-
@VDK 1.07.3 has been provided when i was abroad, therefore only major things has been taken care of. Fix has been applied to the model (Su-22), and testing is on going, Su17 will be dealt later on
-
@vAiCon said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
Fix has been applied to the model (Su-22)
What fix are you talking about? Because the Su-22 is having the same issue.
Thanks
-
@VDK data issues which not aligned with the model
-
@vAiCon so, the issue with flight model mechanics persists right? I’m talking about aircrafts landing gear invisible, afterburner invisible and wings sweep also invisible.