Why I will not make JF-17
-
Love is in the air … haha
with some folks around here, its usually not lost…
March. Who was banned around March…?
-
If you put a bit more effort in your researches you would easily figure out why i said your information is outdated. Going on Wiki and checking out potential buyers isn’t really a research … especially not for someone like you who spend quiet a time around on this forum.
And I kindly asked you more accurate data and you decided to troll me instead.
Again not my war and im sorry.
-
Hello,
I never said that a topic was opened somewhere here.
To be sollicited does not mean something public.
I received a lot of PM about this, and I wanted to post something here, to give my point of view.
Great idea ! I’ll put it on my todo list !
Cheers,
Radium
Thanks Radium that clear it up.
But next time make it clear it was not public otherwise, dumb people like me will troll a fine post.
Cheers
-
with some folks around here, its usually not lost…
March. Who was banned around March…?
Yep old farts like us have the tendency ( and rare one these days), to question ourselves before shooting the messenger.
Thanks Blue
-
What is a JF-17 and what would it do in BMS? :neutral:
-
with some folks around here, its usually not lost…
March. Who was banned around March…?
No idea, i have a life outside the forum. Can’t remember the dates or whatever.
-
If you put a bit more effort in your researches you would easily figure out why i said your information is outdated. Going on Wiki and checking out potential buyers isn’t really a research … especially not for someone like you who spend quiet a time around on this forum.
Canuck just a small point and will finish this conversation.
My time, my life, my computer.
I stay as much time as i want in this forum and its my decision.And i have a very busy life outside here trust me
Just step down please and be kind and polite as i am being with you.
Cheers mate
-
Canuck just a small point and will finish this conversation.
My time, my life, my computer.
I stay as much time as i want in this forum and its my decision.And i have a very busy life outside here trust me
Just step down please and be kind and polite as i am being with you.
Cheers mate
Cheers !
-
It’s unfortunate as was enthusiastically waiting/looking for the aircraft, I can understand if time and priority is an issue, without getting too political(as was the concern by Radium) the aircraft is a formidable force indeed having recently shot down a SU-30MKI. Hope some one else picks it up, many of us fly the Korean theater with aircrafts not built for that theater (Mirages for example), simulating a potential battle and it would have been a great fit since it does have Chinese components as well.
-
i respect Radium’s decision.
But PAF’s skin for JF-17 is far more handsome than those skins in PLAAF.
-
It’s unfortunate as was enthusiastically waiting/looking for the aircraft, I can understand if time and priority is an issue, without getting too political(as was the concern by Radium) the aircraft is a formidable force indeed having recently shot down a SU-30MKI. Hope some one else picks it up, many of us fly the Korean theater with aircrafts not built for that theater (Mirages for example), simulating a potential battle and it would have been a great fit since it does have Chinese components as well.
For this very reason I do not want to deal with JF-17 : there is no proof as far as I know that a JF-17 ever shot down a Su-30 (but they did with Mig-21), this is only a Pakistan claim. So, It gives me here another reason not to make it.
i respect Radium’s decision.
But PAF’s skin for JF-17 is far more handsome than those skins in PLAAF.
How shall I understand this ? Do you mean that you are not satisfied by the quality of my additional J-7 liveries ?
-
For this very reason I do not want to deal with JF-17 : there is no proof as far as I know that a JF-17 ever shot down a Su-30 (but they did with Mig-21), this is only a Pakistan claim. So, It gives me here another reason not to make it.
How shall I understand this ? Do you mean that you are not satisfied by the quality of my additional J-7 liveries ?
Pakistan Air Force never claimed to shoot down either mig21 or su30 with JF-17.Hell they even never mentioned Su30.The official stans is we shot down 2 Indian jets.All of the rest claims are unofficial.
But I dont understand your political point on this.I mean its a war plane,war planes are meant to shoot down jets so what’s it got to do with “not making JF-17 model because it supposedly shot down an Indian jet”.I respect your decision but this point doesn’t make sense to me.
Btw where can I find your additional skins for J-7,I had to make the skins myself for Pakistani livery.
-
This entire thread makes no sense!!!
C9
-
This post is deleted! -
It’s unfortunate as was enthusiastically waiting/looking for the aircraft, I can understand if time and priority is an issue, without getting too political(as was the concern by Radium) the aircraft is a formidable force indeed having recently shot down a SU-30MKI. Hope some one else picks it up, many of us fly the Korean theater with aircrafts not built for that theater (Mirages for example), simulating a potential battle and it would have been a great fit since it does have Chinese components as well.
i respect Radium’s decision.
But PAF’s skin for JF-17 is far more handsome than those skins in PLAAF.
Pakistan Air Force never claimed to shoot down either mig21 or su30 with JF-17.Hell they even never mentioned Su30.The official stans is we shot down 2 Indian jets.All of the rest claims are unofficial.
But I dont understand your political point on this.I mean its a war plane,war planes are meant to shoot down jets so what’s it got to do with “not making JF-17 model because it supposedly shot down an Indian jet”.I respect your decision but this point doesn’t make sense to me.
Btw where can I find your additional skins for J-7,I had to make the skins myself for Pakistani livery.
Liveries will be published with a further release.
It’s unfortunate as was enthusiastically waiting/looking for the aircraft, I can understand if time and priority is an issue, without getting too political(as was the concern by Radium) the aircraft is a formidable force indeed having recently shot down a SU-30MKI. Hope some one else picks it up, many of us fly the Korean theater with aircrafts not built for that theater (Mirages for example), simulating a potential battle and it would have been a great fit since it does have Chinese components as well.
i respect Radium’s decision.
But PAF’s skin for JF-17 is far more handsome than those skins in PLAAF.
@Cloud:
This entire thread makes no sense!!!
C9
That’s your point of view. If you are not interested by it, you can leave it.
Besides, I am tired to receive PM on many forums asking me to make a JF-17.
So, I wanted to write about it.
-
That’s your point of view. If you are not interested by it, you can leave it.
Besides, I am tired to receive PM on many forums asking me to make a JF-17.
So, I wanted to write about it.
That’s why you should make it because of the high demand.A lot of users rely on great modellers like you,JanHas,Tom and cctw1(though his models are low poly but he’s made hundreds of them) and sometimes you have to put users wishes above yours as they are depending on you,it will earn you more respect believe me.
-
It’s unfortunate as was enthusiastically waiting/looking for the aircraft, I can understand if time and priority is an issue, without getting too political(as was the concern by Radium) the aircraft is a formidable force indeed having recently shot down a SU-30MKI. Hope some one else picks it up, many of us fly the Korean theater with aircrafts not built for that theater (Mirages for example), simulating a potential battle and it would have been a great fit since it does have Chinese components as well.
i respect Radium’s decision.
But PAF’s skin for JF-17 is far more handsome than those skins in PLAAF.
That’s why you should make it because of the high demand.A lot of users rely on great modellers like you,JanHas,Tom and cctw1(though his models are low poly but he’s made hundreds of them) and sometimes you have to put users wishes above yours as they are depending on you,it will earn you more respect believe me.
I do not request any respect or anything, I only work for me, and for what I feel relevant for BMS.
Also, somebody did a very nice model :
His name is Muhammad Ahmed. Please ask him his model.
Cheers,
Radium
-
I do not request any respect or anything, I only work for me, and for what I feel relevant for BMS.
Also, somebody did a very nice model :
https://i.imgur.com/X59S0j2.png
His name is Muhammad Ahmed. Please ask him his model.
Cheers,
Radium
Hahaha that’s me.My username is different here and that’s my real name u mentioned.Btw I just made the skin,model was made by cctw1.
I posted this picture when mig21 was shot down.
-
It’s unfortunate as was enthusiastically waiting/looking for the aircraft, I can understand if time and priority is an issue, without getting too political(as was the concern by Radium) the aircraft is a formidable force indeed having recently shot down a SU-30MKI. Hope some one else picks it up, many of us fly the Korean theater with aircrafts not built for that theater (Mirages for example), simulating a potential battle and it would have been a great fit since it does have Chinese components as well.
i respect Radium’s decision.
But PAF’s skin for JF-17 is far more handsome than those skins in PLAAF.
Hahaha that’s me.My username is different here and that’s my real name u mentioned.Btw I just made the skin,model was made by cctw1.
I posted this picture when mig21 was shot down.
This model looks very nice, I do not need to make one then.
Problem solved !
-
This model looks very nice, I do not need to make one then.
Problem solved !
Yeah its good but its low poly.Anyways its useless to argue as you have made up your mind.
Thanks for the other amazing models and keep up the good work.
P.S you could make a Mirage 3 or 5…no political issues in those.