Modelling Organisation
-
@ Manos:
- NORINCO YW531 (Type 63)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_63_(armoured_personnel_carrier)
https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.asp?armor_id=851
https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/type-63.htm
https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ALeKk02-Buh2p87lrMIfWEQdaDJVus1jNQ:1585908880495&q=NORINCO+YW531&tbm=isch&source=univ&client=firefox-b-d&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjM7d77gszoAhWJDxQKHV0mD-QQsAR6BAgMEAE
And its North Korea equivalent (licensed copy)
- VTT323 (M973 Sinhung)
https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.asp?armor_id=394
https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/type-85-apc.htm
…
**DISREGARD! We already have the NORINCO YW531 (using the 3D model of BMP-1 with is simimlar) ! So the VTT323 can use the same 3D model.Stay tuned for another suggestion! … I’ll have to dig the DB more seriously. ;)**
- NORINCO YW531 (Type 63)
-
- Tank Centurion
Or
- If you look in Tacref Artillery, you can choose whatever you like here. MANY of them are very old model or not using the right 3D model (using another one).
Just tell us what you choose so w can monitor and coordinate.
-
- Tank Centurion
Or
- If you look in Tacref Artillery, you can choose whatever you like here. MANY of them are very old model or not using the right 3D model (using another one).
Just tell us what you choose so w can monitor and coordinate.
will check and tell you soon
-
Hi Dee-Jay and Manos,
First of all, thank you Manos for your availability in getting BMS better for all of us.
May I suggest the SA-15, as in tac ref it seems the original version one:D
Thank you very much both of you
Cheers -
@Alienslayer:
Hi Dee-Jay and Manos,
First of all, thank you Manos for your availability in getting BMS better for all of us.
May I suggest the SA-15, as in tac ref it seems the original version one:D
Thank you very much both of you
CheersSA-15 is a good idea.
But please do not interfere and let the Dev managing the coordination. Otherwise you might suggest something already done for the next version and then, wasting resources. -
@Manos:
Don’t do the M113 / M106 / M901
Radium has panned it already.
…
(I will try to open a coordination room when able , but I don’t now when I will be able. I am over tasked and can’t progress on regular duties on DB)
-
Wilco!!
-
Centurion is a must to change. Got a look here is what can benefit from better models in Tank/Artillery with a quick look i made:
Centurion
M60A3 (and M40 (?))
PT-76
M-1974
M-1973
M-1975
M-109 (maybe update it to M-110?)
PzH2000I probably start with Centurion and see how it will go
There’s a lot of models that can be benefited in airplanes as well but thats another storyCheers!
-
M-109 (maybe update it to M-110?)
In DB it is a M-109.
-
-
No plan to add M110 in DB (yet) … what is need in prio (even if not always respected internally) is replacing what is already existing. We have already enough work to achieve. No need to add more until regular is done.
Hope you understand my point.
So M110 is you like … but I won’t add it … or will use it as M109.
Kind regards!
-
No plan to add M110 in DB (yet) … what is need in prio (even if not always respected internally) is replacing what is already existing. We have already enough work to achieve. No need to add more until regular is done.
Hope you understand my point.
So M110 is you like … but I won’t add it … or will use it as M109.
Kind regards!
M109 it is
By the way isnt that in db supposed to be the A6 (?) mod? or Palladin? Cause i think original M109 had a shorter gun barrel but i might be mistalken
-
Centiurion Mesh is ready… tell me some details… tricount etc also dofs or swithes needed?
-
Centiurion Mesh is ready… tell me some details… tricount etc also dofs or swithes needed?
Hello,
check your email !
Cheers,
Radium
-
-
For those who work on Theater models this may be useful https://twitter.com/JanvandenHemel/status/1347256565913575432