Falconeers: The few the Proud.
-
dear devs pls give us update2 pls.
-
-
-
found this masterpiece. credits Dee-Jay -
bms is undoubtedly the more realistic and advanced on many key areas. dcs isn’t bad, but has as much potential as the developers’ hunger for easy money working as little as possible and only on what attracts and without worrying about what’s right.
observing certain strange things (perhaps connected even to the largest audience of dcs over bms) many questions arise. such as in dcs when every time someone writes to correct some things by reporting real data, for what has been exposed perfectly and calmly, arrive people who contrasted with lively discussions and ruin everything, whenever there is even a fair criticism that could lead to better service it is often countered absurdly by suspicious users, often with winning results. every time there is an update there are fanboys cheering beyond all normal limits how the best in the universe it is… I strongly suspect that dcs, as many companies do, they use a lot of people paid by them (indeed there are specialized companies that offer this service at good prices because it works) for writing for a period a good number of manipulative comments, fake review, likes or liar… on media, YouTube etc. used also for make everyone crazy euphoric, increase media visibility to what they want, for discredit someone, make believe unfairly that you are the best, or else. the masses do not spend time to think, they follow the stronger. More or less as some organizers inserting people paid for exult at certain moments and ignite the public during concerts or supporters of soccer teams, political and industrial issues etc etc… a proven tactics used everywhere, usually with really good results if well done. I suspect that this method has also been used by ED against rivals such as bms at periods. I wonder if frictions also depends by the bms developers… who, if I understand correctly, had refused to do dcs f 16 module at that time with a strong “NO”? If true It is a good rival, it is free and a danger to their sales to the point they wanted him to do their f 16, they were rejected, I guess they hate bms!
I remember in certain periods a lot of senseless intrusions on discussions, video, everywhere… obviously I’m not say every idiot that make rude critics is supsect but at time when too many and too insistent to be normal, in some cases incoherent and evident liars only for attack and continue… some of them admit never see once bms but argue there…!? remember also clearly targeted sponsor phrases like: the best Free simulator! when technically for Free you have no cockpit interaction, nor fc3 planes or some basic upgrade…
and their strategy seems to be working so well… despite the big disservice that exists, between incomplete modules after years with new modules coming out, expensive upgrades for modules that I already have and the various limitations and embarrassing things that everyone knows… 95% happy. a little while ago it seemed to me that bms was gaining popularity and people began to understand the differences but with dcs new graphics, 2 excited fanboys, people quickly forget… certain things appear easily. new beautiful clouds and everything’s all right!! People are really blind and superficial… it’s unfair but I can understand a little who want play it, Ed trailer are captivating but with such serious problems many not only buy every new thing instead to be united in pretend a better product and a serious behavior from developer, especially at those prices, but a lot agree to who defend it fiercely!! Incredible… at this point it’s difficult for many of them pretend they admit or appreciate another sim even if it’s better, if they can find so many justifications for defend those who cheat them.
From my point of view even if dcs becomes superior in everything to bms (and I don’t think it will be that easy if they continue like this, also it does not seem correct to call sim a good game but where an s 300 seem weaker than a sa 2 bms… it’s not the main point but…
Maybe it is part of their strategy to spectacularity, make players feel like champions or developers laziness on things that do not increase popularity? I don’t know… But after dozens of similar videos on web, the only next step is the real things says dcs!! lol! they think themselves more realistic even than the USAF specialized simulators!? how bold! Even followed people like growling sidewinders repeat, sometimes in video titles, their idiocy propaganda sponsor phrases, obviously…)
I have nothing against if someone respectfully criticize or prefers dcs to bms and play fair, but no one has the right not just to use so many lies and trick but to spit on bms, this voluntary work, it happens too many times. hour of works, sacrifices, altruism. They have always behaved correctly toward others I think. bms is the top but also if only by hypothesis was the ugliest and most unreal in the world… people don’t understand these important things but anyone who attack and disrespects any volunteer work made with love, respect and ethic from my point of view is just rotten inside and losers that must burn in hell regardless they are bastards companies with their fu@#!ng marketing strategies that attack a minority, double and triple bastards if attack a minority that does not aim to sell their products! or the monkeys that do this for money or follow the attack wave without understanding what they are doing…
I apologize if I have written a lot but I can’t expose it shorter
-
bms is undoubtedly the more realistic and advanced on many key areas. dcs isn’t bad, but has as much potential as the developers’ hunger for easy money working as little as possible and only on what attracts and without worrying about what’s right.
observing certain strange things (perhaps connected even to the largest audience of dcs over bms) many questions arise. such as in dcs when every time someone writes to correct some things by reporting real data, for what has been exposed perfectly and calmly, arrive people who contrasted with lively discussions and ruin everything, whenever there is even a fair criticism that could lead to better service it is often countered absurdly by suspicious users, often with winning results. every time there is an update there are fanboys cheering beyond all normal limits how the best in the universe it is… I strongly suspect that dcs, as many companies do, they use a lot of people paid by them (indeed there are specialized companies that offer this service at good prices because it works) for writing for a period a good number of manipulative comments, fake review, likes or liar… on media, YouTube etc. used also for make everyone crazy euphoric, increase media visibility to what they want, for discredit someone, make believe unfairly that you are the best, or else. the masses do not spend time to think, they follow the stronger. More or less as some organizers inserting people paid for exult at certain moments and ignite the public during concerts or supporters of soccer teams, political and industrial issues etc etc… a proven tactics used everywhere, usually with really good results if well done. I suspect that this method has also been used by ED against rivals such as bms at periods. I wonder if frictions also depends by the bms developers… who, if I understand correctly, had refused to do dcs f 16 module at that time with a strong “NO”? If true It is a good rival, it is free and a danger to their sales to the point they wanted him to do their f 16, they were rejected, I guess they hate bms!
I remember in certain periods a lot of senseless intrusions on discussions, video, everywhere… obviously I’m not say every idiot that make rude critics is supsect but at time when too many and too insistent to be normal, in some cases incoherent and evident liars only for attack and continue… some of them admit never see once bms but argue there…!? remember also clearly targeted sponsor phrases like: the best Free simulator! when technically for Free you have no cockpit interaction, nor fc3 planes or some basic upgrade…
and their strategy seems to be working so well… despite the big disservice that exists, between incomplete modules after years with new modules coming out, expensive upgrades for modules that I already have and the various limitations and embarrassing things that everyone knows… 95% happy. a little while ago it seemed to me that bms was gaining popularity and people began to understand the differences but with dcs new graphics, 2 excited fanboys, people quickly forget… certain things appear easily. new beautiful clouds and everything’s all right!! People are really blind and superficial… it’s unfair but I can understand a little who want play it, Ed trailer are captivating but with such serious problems many not only buy every new thing instead to be united in pretend a better product and a serious behavior from developer, especially at those prices, but a lot agree to who defend it fiercely!! Incredible… at this point it’s difficult for many of them pretend they admit or appreciate another sim even if it’s better, if they can find so many justifications for defend those who cheat them.
From my point of view even if dcs becomes superior in everything to bms (and I don’t think it will be that easy if they continue like this, also it does not seem correct to call sim a good game but where an s 300 seem weaker than a sa 2 bms… it’s not the main point but…
Maybe it is part of their strategy to spectacularity, make players feel like champions or developers laziness on things that do not increase popularity? I don’t know… But after dozens of similar videos on web, the only next step is the real things says dcs!! lol! they think themselves more realistic even than the USAF specialized simulators!? how bold! Even followed people like growling sidewinders repeat, sometimes in video titles, their idiocy propaganda sponsor phrases, obviously…)
I have nothing against if someone respectfully criticize or prefers dcs to bms and play fair, but no one has the right not just to use so many lies and trick but to spit on bms, this voluntary work, it happens too many times. hour of works, sacrifices, altruism. They have always behaved correctly toward others I think. bms is the top but also if only by hypothesis was the ugliest and most unreal in the world… people don’t understand these important things but anyone who attack and disrespects any volunteer work made with love, respect and ethic from my point of view is just rotten inside and losers that must burn in hell regardless they are bastards companies with their fu@#!ng marketing strategies that attack a minority, double and triple bastards if attack a minority that does not aim to sell their products! or the monkeys that do this for money or follow the attack wave without understanding what they are doing…
I apologize if I have written a lot but I can’t expose it shorter
Very accurate post!
Thank god we don’t have anything to sell so we don’t need all such bots to keep the crowd in our favor. Actually I’d say that I even like the idea we won’t become a “cheap sim” that only wants to attract more and more users. Our users, Falcon users since ever were the more tough crowd, those that come to fly but also come to work. Flying Falcon is a lot of fun but it also demanding a lot from the user, I see that as an advantage even if it keeps and will keep some (maybe even most?) people away.
-
totally agree. This allows bms to follow it’s ideals rather than for the sales. I remember the period of the wave of dcs players who more or less gently, depending on the case, criticized bms for the graphics (I don’t know who put it into his head that bms has bad graphics) and for the vr. they are 2 nice things if there are, but i would ask these folks who rate a sim only from the surface if everything else is poor if their nice graphics and vr help the s 300 from the video i linked earlier to fight more efficiently, the awacs from dee jay youtube video to not crash into a tree or if they complete what is missing from their half-functioning modules. LOL! I apologize for being too direct but I believe it is the truth. in fact bms is not for everyone but sad for our developer, modder and who work here, because instead of recognizing it with humility, many evaluate it as inferior without even trying it… when it’s excellent and authentic
-
totally agree. This allows bms to follow it’s ideals rather than for the sales. I remember the period of the wave of dcs players who more or less gently, depending on the case, criticized bms for the graphics (I don’t know who put it into his head that bms has bad graphics) and for the vr. they are 2 nice things if there are, but i would ask these folks who rate a sim only from the surface if everything else is poor if their nice graphics and vr help the s 300 from the video i linked earlier to fight more efficiently, the awacs from dee jay youtube video to not crash into a tree or if they complete what is missing from their half-functioning modules. LOL! I apologize for being too direct but I believe it is the truth. in fact bms is not for everyone but sad for our developer, modder and who work here, because instead of recognizing it with humility, many evaluate it as inferior without even trying it… when it’s excellent and authentic
cheers to all Falcon Devs and the loyal Falconeers. The few the proud.
-
I don’t want to sound too flattering (did I write correctly?) but sometimes I happen to think: if I had something of my own to which I dedicate so much and only for passion, to receive so much mud…? it’s nice if us sometimes let them know that they have our appreciation, it is justice
-
I don’t want to sound too flattering (did I write correctly?) but sometimes I happen to think: if I had something of my own to which I dedicate so much and only for passion, to receive so much mud…? it’s nice if us sometimes let them know that they have our appreciation, it is justice
100% true… thanks @koaro… indeed it is justice and we must appreciate and acknowledge the dedication of the team at all times…
your comment makes me feel that I have truly achieved the purpose of this thread.
happy landings.