Are CBUs working the way they are supposed to on BMS?
-
Well, I
ve been destroying SA-5s with these CBUs more accurately after all suggestions here, so thank you, guys!! Perhaps BMS Devs could improve the SA-5 so it becomes more difficult for us to kill it, and powerful, even though I
ve always been told that the SA-5 is not meant to destroy fighters with the level of maneuverability that we have in an F-16. -
SA-5 is obsolete and was mainly destined to big non maneuverable bombers.
-
SA-5 is obsolete and was mainly destined to big non maneuverable bombers.
It’s like I have to repeat that sentence every time I’m discussing a COMAO.
-
SA-5 is obsolete and was mainly destined to big non maneuverable bombers.
And fast missiles like the AGM-28.
Yes, it can be considered as obsolete but somehow it could shot down an Israel F-16I not so long ago.The max. 10G of the missile at med alt. is not so high but if you consider the M3.0 speed then it became.
It is not so easy to dodge.It can be considered obsolete because of the painful operation with a 7+ ton missile which so many limitations regarding:
Min. eng. dist.
Min. eng. alt.
The insanely dangerous liq. fuel. It used the same as the SA-1/2. -
Yes, it can be considered as obsolete but somehow it could shot down an Israel F-16I not so long ago.
Sure.
This is why we keep it in game. -
They Hit the Square pair with harms first which denies the launchers from firing and then they hammer the launchers with cbu or mavs.
-
Sure.
This is why we keep it in game.It would be great to have the 3D model of the real SA-5 site.
It was posted in a topic of a 3rd party theater as I can recall (?) but so fat nothing happened following my question regarding it. -
-
…they look like typical SAM sites to me.
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/images/s-200-image17.jpg
The first image is just a missile launcher area, it is very, very far from a complete site…
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/ibpuhagkr7a8w/ENG_-_HT_Osszefoglalo -
…yes - that’s why I posted two references.