Well now everything costs $999,999,999.
Good luck paying for that…
Well now everything costs $999,999,999.
Good luck paying for that…
@jayb Thank you for the suggestion! Will try next time - but is there a place where I can find this frequency in ITO? The ITO charts only had the VHF frequency of the airstrip unfortunately…
@JollyFE Yes I saved the comms and also visually confirmed that the VHF frequency matches that provides in the briefing. Yet no luck getting the tower to talk to me in VHF.
There are a few funny incidents though where the UHF frequency given in the comms happens to match those of nearby airbases, resulting in ATC asking me to taxi to taxiways that does not exist
@JollyFE When I switch to the tower VHF frequency right now, the options for departure and approach are both greyed out, so I am unable to contact the tower for either departure / approach. So yes it applies to both cases
@Snake122 So the lack of tower control is basically a case of how airstrips operate in general. Interesting! But the airbase does have a tower (in 3D at least) and considering that it has a VHF frequency as well, I’m surprised I wasn’t able to communicate with it.
Recently I have been trying to create TEs where I take off from the Meggido airtrip in Israel. To my surprise, I realised that these aistrips have neither ATIS nor ground control frequencies!
Most surprising of all, the tower frequency is present on VHF instead of UHF. When I switch to the correct VHF, however, I am unable to communicate for either takeoff or landings.
So far I am taking off and landing frequently without clearance, and the ATC is certainly very mad at me! Is there anything I can do to communicate and obtain clearance from these airstrips?
I feel that one thing we’ll have to take note as well is that the switch to the new forum is nearly concurrent with the release of U3.
For me, I didn’t react to the new release because I am still getting used to the new forum format. Although the layout is more mpdern and more features are available, I personally find that the forum arrangements are a bit more messy compared to the past, and did not notice the new release until it was posted on Reddit. It is certainly something that need time to get used to.
The new release was still awesome though, and a big thank you for the BMS team for the awesome product!
Are you at the correct frequency? If your UHF frequency is incorrect then you cannot receive AWACS responses.
In BMS 4.34 U2, the HUD of the F-15C seems to be gone. There was only an empty glass in place of the HUD.
Has anyone experienced similar issues?
Some info on the flight characteristics on J-20:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/translation-of-j-20-article-by-dr-song-wencong.165231/
This research article is written by Dr Song Wenzhong which is the chief designer of J-10. The aerodynamic characteristics is described is effectively that of J-20.
Hey,
This is what your screen should look like.
The feature will check if you have mixed up different icons for the same AC.
Yes, there are 3 locations where Icons are set. And best would be all Icons are set the same for the AC concerned.
One location is here in the TePlanes list. And 3 are in the Database, one for the flight and one for the squadron.
So if they are not the same, change the one in the TePlanes list to the one you need.
Then go to the database (BMS Editor) to change its respective Flight and Squadron to the same number.If you still don’t see the same Icon in game, you have messed up other data. Read: your data for the AC has not been set up correctly.
First thing to check is the Specific value for the AC concerned.
It should be a unique value for the type. (Fighter, Attack, Bomber)
Make sure the same Type and Specifc value is used for the Flight and Squadron as well.If this doesn’t help you out… I need more info
Gr Falcas
Invalid Attatchment.
Thanks for the replies.
Since the debriefing page is not recording the hits, would the hits still be recorded in the
(1) 2D campaign page during campaigns;
(2) Pilot Logbook?