Massive FPS Loss
-
I should read this thread before I buy gtx970.
now it is too late.It is true somehow gtx970 does not work well with bms4.33.
Compared to my previous card: gtx560, gtx970 only add 5-6fps.
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?24925-GTX970-owner-please-post-your-fps -
Sad to hear that. I was looking for a solution and was onto upgrading. Thx for sharing as it saves me money. TFR TE all on 28 fps. intel 3770, gtx 670, 1920x1080, ssd.
It just seems it doesnt react that much to hardware. Setting high performance in the nvidia control panel is what boosts the most in my setup.Hope you get to run better.
Cheers!!
-
I have an i7-3770 (non-k modelā¦locked via BIOS to the āturboā speed of 3.9GHz) paired with a ASUS Strix 2GB GTX960 at stock clocks and 8GB of ancient RAM. I have almost all eye-candy turned ON with the exception of smoke shadows and cloud reflections on water (because I just personally dislike the reflections). In the campaign, even with terrible weather and the TGP/WPN pages on, I never drop below 30FPS. Even over the FLOT. South of the FLOT on ingress/egress Iām locked at 60FPS no matter what.
As you can see, my PC is very modest but Iām able to get great performance in 4.33 and many other games. Some of the other games I play and the performance I get:
Shadow of Morder, Ultra preset: 60FPS
Sniper Elite 3, Ultra preset: 60FPS
Watch Dogs, Ultra preset: 60FPS
Arma 2 OA, Most settings maxed: 40-60FPS
FSX with REX, FTX Global and Vector, ASN, and the PMDG NGX flying out of Flightbeam KDEN, All FSX settings maxed: 30-40FPS
Silent Hunter V5, Ultra preset: 60FPS
The list goes onā¦My secret? I keep my PC EXTREMELY clean. No adware, no malware, no viruses. Very deep and thorough scans on a regular basis using various free software. I also keep it physically clean by blowing out dust on a regular basis and always ensuring I have adequate cooling. No unnecessary software running at any given time. Regular defrags on HDDs. Windows running on a dedicated SSD. It all adds up to a high performing PC even with moderate/mid-range hardware.
-
I have some weird issue I cant figure out with fps.
My frames drop from mid 30ās down to 5-8 while just flying around. Just installed 4.33 yesterday so I havenāt tried to optimize setting yet, but I should be getting better frames than that.Only other game currently installed is Arma 3 and I run that on ultra high and maintain 40-45 fps.
Forgot specs
Win 10
GTX 750 TI
8GB ram
1TB HD -
This is most unlikely trueā¦ One key thing to remember is not all drivers are created equal. You have just added a ton more overhead and you got an improvement as well. Pretty fair trade IMO. Itās a great card and it should last you for some time.
-
the worst fps loss is FLIR and TGP.
playing the TFR training mission with no FLIR, I get 47fps.
playing the TFR training mission with FLIR on HUD, I get 24fps.
FPS loss: 47-24 = 23playing the LGB training mission with TGP off, I get 60fps.
playing the LGB training mission with TGP on, I get 40fps.
FPS loss: 60-40 = 20and by changing the vga card from gtx560 to gtx970,
this fps loss stays more or less the same.so this must be more affected by cpu?
is this correct? -
Most probably.
I just changed my rig, going from an AMD A10-7700K to an Intel I5-4460 (same amount of RAM, same GPU, i.e. an R9-270X), and I got a lot more FPS : instead of 15/20 fps with TGP on I now get 40/45, and the game is now playable and enjoyable.
-
I thought that the most influential factor for fps is the clock speed
since bms does not take advantage the multi cores fully.
So this is not true anymore for 4.33?Mine is i3@4,4ghz.
your i5-4460 is 3,2ghz ? -
From all of the to date posts about 4.33 performance on various rigs and hardware configurations - is it not a factor of having high end Intel (as opposed to AMD) processor to be most influential? Of course good GPX is also important, but not as much as the GPU. I know it is perhaps to big generalization, but still it looks to me, that this might be the case?
-
I thought that the most influential factor for fps is the clock speed
since bms does not take advantage the multi cores fully.
So this is not true anymore for 4.33?Mine is i3@4,4ghz.
your i5-4460 is 3,2ghz ?Well, my AMD was theoretically a bit faster but, as Polak just wrote, it seems thereās a problem with some AMD processors. For some unclear reason, theyāre not good at running Falcon, in spite of a decent clock speed.
-
Well, my AMD was theoretically a bit faster but, as Polak just wrote, it seems thereās a problem with some AMD processors. For some unclear reason, theyāre not good at running Falcon, in spite of a decent clock speed.
Because falcon is single core program, AMD single core performance sucks.
And AMD 4,0ghz is slower that 4,0ghz Intel because AMDs old technology. Just Google some reviews
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-4170-core-i3-3220-benchmarks,3314-7.html dual core Intel is even better or equal
Clock vs clock Intel makes more work
-
Because falcon is single core program, AMD single core performance sucks.
And AMD 4,0ghz is slower that 4,0ghz Intel because AMDs old technology. Just Google some reviews
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-4170-core-i3-3220-benchmarks,3314-7.html dual core Intel is even better or equal
Clock vs clock Intel makes more work
If bms4.33 is still a single core program,
why is my i3-530 o/c to 4,4Ghz with gtx970 slower than I5-4460 with R9-270X?It does not make sense.
-
Gtx 970 has problem with BMS
And I5 is faster than I3 , maybe because BMS is multi threaded program (not same as multicore) and I5 is better tech than I3.
But AMD sucks anyway for simming where pure calculation performance is what maters
-
Thanks for the reply haukka81.
I didnāt know that gtx970 has problem with BMS,
so that explain why gtx970 performance is so terrible with BMS.Do you know if there is any workaround for it?
And for BMS, with the same clock speed, is i7 better than i5?
-
Thanks for the reply haukka81.
I didnāt know that gtx970 has problem with BMS,
so that explain why gtx970 performance is so terrible with BMS.Do you know if there is any workaround for it?
And for BMS, with the same clock speed, is i7 better than i5?
I7 may not be better , least not for it high cost so for games I5 is best price / performance CPU
Im not sure about 970 but lots of fps problems here in forums in 970 users so it Looks like there is some problem. I have 660gtx and BMS runs really fine
-
@APOLLO:
I also experienced dramatic loss of FPS with 4 33 due to low performance of my laptop.
Even with various setup graphics tuning, the best results i could make, were still not enough for proper flying experienceā¦SOLUTION 1
One way to improve poor performance on your rig is to go to Control Panel / System / System Settings for Advanced users / Performance (visual effects, cpu timetable memory use/ visual memory) and select Settings / For Advanced users
In Visual memory settings press āChangeā. In Size Adjustment you have 2 boxes with āoriginal size MBā and āMax size MBā
You have now the capability of expand the usage of free HD space in favor of you RAM in order to speed up performance!
Depending of your free HD space you select a new number and press Select / OK.
I saw great improvment in my laptop and FPS impact on BMS.
Again a great āTHANK YOUā at BMS Team for all the efforts to improve this great sim!!
ā+1ā on this this. Turning down tress and clouds didnāt do much, so I tried the above and it does make a big difference.So, thx , Apollo
-
i5 2500k 4.4ghz, 8g ram, 280x 3gb, never drop below 30 (avg 45-50+) all eye candy on, TGP, TFR, WPN and FLIR cause hardly any fps drop now compared to 4.32, all in all 4.33 is better all round fps wise for me, and I havenāt upgraded for a long time, except for drivers, oh and Iām now using Windows 10 64 bit, no issues.
-
Hey Drexx you have that 2500 on air or water cooled?
-
Liquid cooling, i.e. a fan blows on a radiator that cools the liquid that circulates round my CPU.
-
i5 2500k 4.4ghz, 8g ram, 280x 3gb, never drop below 30 (avg 45-50+) all eye candy on, TGP, TFR, WPN and FLIR cause hardly any fps drop now compared to 4.32, all in all 4.33 is better all round fps wise for me, and I havenāt upgraded for a long time, except for drivers, oh and Iām now using Windows 10 64 bit, no issues.
I am astonished - I have very similar 2500K running at 4.3GHz; 8GB DDR3 but with Radeon 5750 1GB over WIN7 64 bit and averaging only 25 FPS (though I do have extracted MFD into separate windows and MFDE for some gauges) - is the R9 280x really improving performance that much or am I just crippling my FPS with the extracted stuff??