WIP - Personal Project F-16 all versions
-
So the model source files would need to be made available additionally. I think that answers my question, thanks!
-
Hello,
Juridically speaking: this licence means that you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made, that you may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. On this point, creators are not specifically given credit, as BMS gets a property title of the model given : in fact, when you give a model to BMS there is two independant rights holders, this is in fact a twin patrimonial relationship.
This licence also means that you should share alike and must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. In that case, BMS do not distribute its software with this kind of licence, so, we can’t comply this rule.
I suppose you now understand that BMS licences are really custom ecause we prefer to keep the maximum control we can on the software components.
Best regards,
Radium
-
You must distribute the derivative work under the same license, but BMS is not a derivative of a 3D model[emoji14]
BMS is a complex work which means individual components of it can have different authors and different licenses.Anyway that also answers my question differently. If it is a requirement that ownership of the model is solely transferred to BMS for its inclusion, that would preclude the use of CC licenses.
-
Hi guys
Some news on the f-16 basic frame: Addition to the ADF’s vertical tail, as the APX-109 IFF antennas. LAU-129’s installed on te wingtips as well. More to come soon.
While that, pondering on which model I can work in paralell.
Best regards!
-
Or A-freakin’-10.
+1
Yes please A-10. Now that we all wanted the Hornet, now the A-10’s turn……:p
-
Please let us know your project, if you decide one, we could advise you about the ideal budget.
Hi Radium, which would the ideal budget for the A-10 be? I’m not saying I’ll pick it for sure, but considering the idea seriously…
-
Hi Radium, which would the ideal budget for the A-10 be? I’m not saying I’ll pick it for sure, but considering the idea seriously…
Hello,
I really don’t think A-10 would be the most urging aircraft to build. Her model is not great, but still acceptable… Please also consider that DCS is simulating A-10C very well, so your possible A-10 for BMS will always suffer of the possible comparison and undertaking… If I had to advise you, I think that a F-4E would be much more useful and urging for the campaigns… South Korea has it, Japan has it, Israel has it, Greece has it, Turkey has it… All the major countries of BMS BLUFOR side has or had the F-4…
Regards,
Radium
-
Hi Radium,
What about 3D pit modeling. Is there information on how to get a 3D pit filled with gauges and how to get it in bms?
Curious to know.
Thanks
-
I really don’t think A-10 would be the most urging aircraft to build. Her model is not great, but still acceptable…
Largely acceptable!
… Why are you always considereing the a/c guys?! … Just take a look to the campaing and the tacref.
If you want to contribute in BMS going forward … If you are looking for airframe deserving a new life … IL78, IL78, C-17, C-5, MD500, UH-1, OH-58, … Just take a look in the tacref, it is obvious! … There are also at lot of ground objects … -
Hi Radium,
What about 3D pit modeling. Is there information on how to get a 3D pit filled with gauges and how to get it in bms?
Curious to know.
Thanks
Hello,
It is certainly a complex part. As it mixes everything of BMS 3D dev tools…
It can be really tricky…
As a good start, I recommend F-16 derivated cockpits such as :
- KAI T-50
- AIDC Ching Kuo
- F-2 (I am doing it)
- F-5S
But you would need ro make exterior models also…
If you need advise I can give you, but first, think about your motivation about such ambitious project.
Regards,
Radiim
-
-
-
Just 4 the record, a brand new highly detailed A-10 is almost ready, but the vipers are in priority.
That’s all 4 now folks.
-
Just 4 the record, a brand new highly detailed A-10 is almost ready, but the vipers are in priority.
That’s all 4 now folks.
Please go on?
There is no specific priority like what you mentions…
If an A-10 is finished, and complies BMS rules, it shall be integrated.
-
There is no specific priority like what you mentions…
I was not referring to any of the current BMS 3D devs, so nothing to do with the team’s priorities. It’s another creators side project.
If an A-10 is finished, and complies BMS rules, it shall be integrated.
Of course, but poly details are not in my knowledge at the moment. We will find out when time comes.
-
I was not referring to any of the current BMS 3D devs, so nothing to do with the team’s priorities. It’s another creators side project.
Of course, but poly details are not in my knowledge at the moment. We will find out when time comes.
Thank you for your precision!
-
Alright, I’ll keep looking.
Thank you guys!
-
Hello,
Please also consider that DCS is simulating A-10C very well, so your possible A-10 for BMS will always suffer of the possible comparison and undertaking… If I had to advise you, I think that a F-4E would be much more useful and urging for the campaigns… South Korea has it, Japan has it, Israel has it, Greece has it, Turkey has it… All the major countries of BMS BLUFOR side has or had the F-4…
Regards,
Radium
Well, a comparison with DCS would be completely nonsense, once the model specifications there are completely different, as well as the modelling techniques, I could tell you each model there counts in average 100,000 polys, not tris… maybe even more… but I understand what you mean and, once there’s another a-10 coming out of the oven, it’s fine, let look for another one.
About the F-4: isn’t JanHas developing different F-4 variants? I remember seeing it and, if my mind doesn’t trick me, I remember seeing someone else modelling specificaly the F-4E in another thread. It seems there’s a C-130 from JanHas as well, which looks impressive already, so now I’m looking for something nobody put their hands yet. I’ll check all the references you guys sent me and make a pick.
Best regards,
Stay strong!
-
Well, a comparison with DCS would be completely nonsense, once the model specifications there are completely different, as well as the modelling techniques, I could tell you each model there counts in average 100,000 polys, not tris… maybe even more… but I understand what you mean and, once there’s another a-10 coming out of the oven, it’s fine, let look for another one.
About the F-4: isn’t JanHas developing different F-4 variants? I remember seeing it and, if my mind doesn’t trick me, I remember seeing someone else modelling specificaly the F-4E in another thread. It seems there’s a C-130 from JanHas as well, which looks impressive already, so now I’m looking for something nobody put their hands yet. I’ll check all the references you guys sent me and make a pick.
Best regards,
Stay strong!
The comparison with DCS was only established because it is interesting, I suppose to use BMS engine for what doesn’t exist already in the world of simulation. Then, it gives the opportunity to pilot new stuff, and extend the database of BMS.
After that, I gave you my mind about A-10, and I still trust, she is not a priority at all, and I feel disappointment that you wouldn’t choose something new, or more urging.
But you can do what you want, I have no right to demand something. You are free to act.
Best regards,
Radium
-
The comparison with DCS was only established because it is interesting, I suppose to use BMS engine for what doesn’t exist already in the world of simulation. Then, it gives the opportunity to pilot new stuff, and extend the database of BMS.
After that, I gave you my mind about A-10, and I still trust, she is not a priority at all, and I feel disappointment that you wouldn’t choose something new, or more urging.
But you can do what you want, I have no right to demand something. You are free to act.
Best regards,
Radium
But it was not my pick for sure, I’m considering other possibilities, as I said before, it was one of my considerations.
Actually, I’m considering two situations right now: one is remodelling models already existing in the database such as transporters (C-17, C5) and aircraft from brazilian inventory, as the F-5M, A-29, R-99s… brazilian A/C are things I’ll put my hands on for sure, just don’t know if now or later… I’m considering some russian and chinese equipment as well. I’m looking among the options and reference sources in order to make my picks. Reference material is a thing, once some of them are very hard to find with a good level of fidelity and accuracy.
Anyway, your oppinion is always very important and I’m open to any suggestions you guys have to give me!
Stay strong!