WIP - Personal Project F-16 all versions
-
Just 4 the record, a brand new highly detailed A-10 is almost ready, but the vipers are in priority.
That’s all 4 now folks.
Can’t wait for that! Any screens, pleeeease?:>
-
Hi guys,
The biplace cockpit bubble and frame are done. You may notice an apparent failure; it’s cause I didn’t “cut” the canopy frame from the fuselage yet, they’re overlayed. Well, let’s go to the pics:
-
Update of the week: working on the dorsal spine, as the greek’s, polish’s and israeli’s versions. Some adjustments and parts still being made.
-
Hi guys
The progress is a little slower recently, as my vacation is over, so less time to work on the project, but I’m still working on it.
So, a little update to you:
-
Nice!
Thank just for you to know (since we already have a VERY good F-16 in game and another is in preparation … if you are looking for inspiration? ) In BMS, CH-47 Chinook, C-17 Globmaster, IL-76, IL-78 Midas and A-50 Mainstay a very common in campaign … but VERY ugly and out to date!
-
C-160 , HUEY, APACHE 64A , 64D LONGBOW , MIL MI- 24 ,HAVOC , TIGER EUROCOPTER, A-7D , ……
-
Ah, so few then? :lol:
With best regards,
-
C-160 , HUEY, APACHE 64A , 64D LONGBOW , MIL MI- 24 ,HAVOC , TIGER EUROCOPTER, A-7D , ……
Disregard from that list the C-160, AH-64 and A-7 (being already worked by someone else) … and for info, there is no data entry for Mi28 HAVOC, nor for the Tiger in present default database.
EDIT: And my previous post was just an info, not a request of course.
-
And next post…
Well I asked for them but nobody cared… Yeah we know u by now… :lol: and Darth Vader Comes out. :rofl: -
The list is still available here:
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?7220-Modelling-OrganisationRegards
EGHI -
Nice!
Thank just for you to know (since we already have a VERY good F-16 in game and another is in preparation … if you are looking for inspiration? ) In BMS, CH-47 Chinook, C-17 Globmaster, IL-76, IL-78 Midas and A-50 Mainstay a very common in campaign … but VERY ugly and out to date!
Disregard from that list the C-160, AH-64 and A-7 (being already worked by someone else) … and for info, there is no data entry for Mi28 HAVOC, nor for the Tiger in present default database.
EDIT: And my previous post was just an info, not a request of course.
Hey Buddy,
I think our friend Ahroun is not looking for any kind inspiration…
He already has it and seems just want to dream making his F-16.
Let’s just accept it!
Cheers,
Radium
-
Well, he IS sharpening his nails, so, button line, its more important to improve his skills for our hobby growth than another model war…
BTW the overall shape is just perfect.
-
Well, he IS sharpening his nails, so, button line, its more important to improve his skills for our hobby growth than another model war…
BTW the overall shape is just perfect.
Thanks for the support Raptor. It seems that you, and you only, got the spirit here. And there’s what comes next:
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?26317-Tu-95-Bear
-
Thanks Ahroun. No rocket science here, I do believe most of the guyz here agree with what I’ve wrote, although many want to add an extra cherry in the cake.
I will be honest. I am aware of JanHas WIP stuff, and I can assure you and anyone else in here that his new LVN3 Vipers will be a model that not even DCS or FSX will ever model. That of course may come in direct conversations about fps, but, the hardware progress towards the latest years maybe worth’s the try and the COUNTLESS hours of research, modelling and painting spend on these, again as a “personal” project effort since these models will not be aligned with BMS poly’s standards. Each one will have to test himself vs his pc system and decides if he adopts them.
But, since similar/parallel works from different persons are not against each other, and this is a personal choice as I can very well have 2 or more installs in my system, one as MP standard fully aligned with BMS standards, updates etc, and one modded for tests with any models out there, then there is no problem to model whatever you want. Bottom line is that you ARE improving your skills, and since the dev team can benefit from these skills one day, it is better to give one the freedom to create freely what he likes, rather tell him from his first post don’t make this, don’t spend your time on that, oh… there are other dozen models missing that you can focus on them. And at the end of the day what is going to be officially added to the db is another process that is only on the evaluation of BMS devs and not the crown.
I am just sure that when you’ll get infected with the BMS-virus you can have a great time here and benefit our ecosystem with your abilities.