The future of BMS
-
The future of BMS, to rearm an F-16 in a solo or multy mission. If possible a simulation of a rearm, not a realistic rearmament which lasts 1 hour or more.;)
You should leave BMS buddy. You will not be happy with it. Why not DCS? … much better … lot of objects on the ground. Plenty of buildings, everywhere. AND YESSSS … under DCS you can rearm the same time you refuel. IMHO, your future there : https://forums.eagle.ru/
… please.
-
In real yes for a lot of time, in simulation 10 or 15 minutes.:)
-
You should leave BMS buddy. You will not be happy with it. Why not DCS? … much better … lot of objects on the ground. Plenty of buildings, everywhere. AND YESSSS … under DCS you can rearm the same time you refuel. IMHO, your future there : https://forums.eagle.ru/
… please.
Ok in 10 years to rearm an F-16 in BMS, as for the Dx11 or Dx12.:yo:
-
Ok in 10 years to rearm an F-16 in BMS,
Not even in one century buddy. As Sting would say: “rearm is for pussies” LOL
as for the Dx11 or Dx12.
Yeah … But by then we have finished the portage into DX12, computer OS will be Windows20 (or iOS 69.666) soft will run on DX24 and you will not longer have a top notch computer because ED would have sucked all your money.
-
Not even in one century buddy. As Sting would say: “rearm is for pussies” LOL
The new generation will do it because Dee-Jay is not eternal, so in 10 or 20 years. Dee-Jay will not be able to enjoy it.;)
-
The new generation will do it because Dee-Jay is not eternal, so in 10 or 20 years. Dee-Jay will not be able to enjoy it.;)
Your’re right mate … I will be dead, shot down on a real life mission, died of old age, or died laughing by reading some posts from you kid.
Well, rather than blabbing here, I’m going back to working on the development so that you can spit on it as you are used to (while enjoying it anyway … for free.) when the new version will be released “in three - four weeks”.Cheers!
-
This is what will kill BMS, the over reaction to nonsense post by normal mature members.
Turning this into a DCS bashing thread.
Letting this run for over 10 pages (93 posts).
And the jibberish posts by members who should be Flying or working rather then spending their time replying to every thread.
Realy people, get a life out side of this forum, and then you might enjoy Falcon 4.0 and what BMS and so many others have done to maintain their passion for the Flight sim we all have loved.
-
This is what will kill BMS, the over reaction to nonsense post by normal mature members.
Shadow … we do not need a lesson in morality nor a lesson of maturity. But thank you.
You may consider the participation in this discussion just like a break after spending 15 hours on this funking editor to try to brings you something as clean as possible … again … for free. Nacy is a bit of my recreation. Did not I deserve the recreation of my choice? -
I’m going back to working on the development
Let the new generation do it with envy for rearm, because you will do it reluctantly.
-
If you need pretty graphics and SweetFX to make the “game” playable, you’ve obvioulsy missed what BMS is about. It’s a flight simulator for ****s sake! I could elaborate, but I sincerely believe I’d be wasting my time and no doubt yours.
Obviously you just want to read what you want to read, like a frog in a wells who is not able to see beyond the borders of its fountain.
In its quintessence this sentence means: Allthough the ugliness of its graphics I am (was) willing to mess about with Falcon BMS and it’s high study level gameplay/manuals; and instead of giving it up or just complaining I was willing to improve its overall looks for my needs, which can help quite a loooot in immersion. Immersion is substantial !!! If not immersed a game player will not be really hooked up by the game.
If not hooked up and immersed it can become more and more difficult for someones drive and ambition to learn all this new stuff or to become really good in something whatsoever. Similar to life: If you can’t get hooked up by the girls appearance it can become very difficult to fall in love with her (in this particular case I know what taking about). This is common sense and a guy with 1.398 posts like you and joining this site since 7 years should know this fundamental pillars of a good Flightsim, Gameplay or whatsoever.
And YES: Falcon is a high study combat flight sim I’m not a moron. Basically it was not my intention to engage with it because of some arcadish feeling or because of its modest graphics, but because I’m a flightsim enthusiast, particular in combat sims.
-
One more time …
.Cyrill (Dee-Jay): referencing to this silly youtube video you’ve disrespected me as a person, theres is a lot of cursing going on in this vid. So what :uham: ?
You know who I am: Once I’ve gifted you with a DCS Gazelle Module a couple of months ago.
While this gift stays unconditional as I stated in my last message to you, I’ve recognized in the last months on this forum that you are not only a nice guy, but a quite arrogant BMS developer as well.
And because of this arrogance coming out off your nose and ears you are not really willingly to listen to users needs; mainly just defending and spreading your own approaches.
Just want to recall a quotation Red Dog made in the DCS Forum a couple of weeks ago during the DCS/FA-18C Hornet bashing, where you’ve been involved too: retourne à ta porte ! .
PS: Don’t worry guys, it is my last post on BMS forum (and likely my last visit too ). I will not criticize your " holy BMS cow " anymore or one or two BMS developer; it’s certainly a waste of time! One last advice: Make Falcon BMS a payware .
Arty is completely right with this picture: Falcon BMS WILL NEVER BECOME a real diamond without needs of serious pressure; maybe an emerald but not a diamond for sure if developing approach is going on the current way and pace. -
Falcon BMS WILL NEVER BECOME a real diamond
It already is a diamond. In fact, Falcon 4.0 has been a diamond since 1.08 - as it has aged, it has gotten better and better. But if you disagree, then do point out throughout the life of Falcon 4.0, which simulators could compete with it?
There simply hasn’t been any other modern jet simulator that has been able to bring the same experience in total aerial warfare.Flanker, LOMAC and now DCS are great flight simulators as well and certainly DCS has a lot going for it. But I don’t think we’ll see it ever bring such a complex dynamic campaign engine as Falcon 4.0 - which was always meant to be part of Spectrum Holobyte’s Electronic Battlefield Series (EBS). It was so ambitious that it first sank Spectrum Holobyte and then Microprose. Which is why Falcon still lives on today - no company has ever been daft enough to attempt to create anything like Falcon 4.0’s campaign engine, mainly because the cost of doing so would never yield any return of investment. The market is too small and no one is going to pay $500 for a simulator!
-
Well no pressure no diamonds is a way different approach and adaptation in BMS.
Money doesn’t make the BMS world go around. It’s something beyond and above it.
If you can’t understand it well I would suggest to read the “earth of humans” or “man and his world” book by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, it’s small to the point and awarded as only few books did.
There are higher values in life than money that are those that stand out and overcome all others. Materialism doesn’t drive this team, it kills it.Στάλθηκε από το MI 5 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
-
You know who I am:
Nope.
Once I’ve gifted you with a DCS Gazelle Module a couple of months ago.
:oops: My gosh!!! …. but it is unfair if you have two pseudos on BMS Forum!?! :hippie: “For me” The one who gifted me the Gazelle is Udet!?! So if you are the same person, how could I know it!?
This video is a joke of course (do this a lot with Radium who is a good friend) … but for sure, I own you apologies. Especially considering the generous gifts you’ve made. But you might also consider the following … we (on BMS) are also offering a sort of gifts (I’ve spent my entire weeks of holidays on dev duties until very late in the night to be ready for a sort of dead line and this is quite often like this scarifying a large part of our personal life) and when we see nacy (known on another famous french forum to be a big troll) spitting on our face every time, you might understand that we can also be offended. It is like someone is invited at your table and then he tells you that your food is shit while smiling. It is even more offending towards my team mates considering the time en efforts they have spent to offer what BMS is. I do not relly care if someone tells me that what I am doing is carp. But I have hard time when thinking about them (one good example is the thread about manuals and docs … I can’t stand reading that they are badly made or pointless considering the time and devotion the doc team spend on it).
While this gift stays unconditional as I stated in my last message to you, I’ve recognized in the last months on this forum that you are not only a nice guy, but a quite arrogant BMS developer as well.
I can understand that. And I am sorry about it.
And because of this arrogance coming out off your nose and ears you are not really willingly to listen to users needs; mainly just defending and spreading your own approaches.
… well … it is my fault for sure of being unable to express myself correctly especially in non native language. It is not a question of what “I” want. I am providing from time to time some small pieces of info about what is to be expected and what is less and try to explain a bit “why” when it is possible. But this is a mistake because each time, ppl who are disappointed not to have dual seat, multi a/c avionics, IFF or L16 … etc … when I say “do not hold your breath” think it is me who don’t want to do it. But I am nobody in the team. I do not decide what must be done or not and what are priorities.
retourne à ta porte ! .
It is “balaye devant ta porte”. … but don’t worry. I got it. One more time … you right. I shouldn’t comes here. I is pointless and a pure lost time. And this is why almost no other dev come here anymore. For a long time now. But I am wrong … they are right. And you are right.
One last advice: Make Falcon BMS a payware .
Already explained why it is not possible and would never brings you anything good. There are a lot of pages about it.
Edit:
@ Kal-EL, please check PM in your “Udet” account. I owe you some more explanations. -
Cyrill (Dee-Jay): referencing to this silly youtube video you’ve disrespected me as a person, theres is a lot of cursing going on in this vid. So what :uham: ?
You know who I am: Once I’ve gifted you with a DCS Gazelle Module a couple of months ago.
While this gift stays unconditional as I stated in my last message to you, I’ve recognized in the last months on this forum that you are not only a nice guy, but a quite arrogant BMS developer as well.
And because of this arrogance coming out off your nose and ears you are not really willingly to listen to users needs; mainly just defending and spreading your own approaches.
Just want to recall a quotation Red Dog made in the DCS Forum a couple of weeks ago during the DCS/FA-18C Hornet bashing, where you’ve been involved too: retourne à ta porte ! .
PS: Don’t worry guys, it is my last post on BMS forum (and likely my last visit too ). I will not criticize your " holy BMS cow " anymore or one or two BMS developer; it’s certainly a waste of time! One last advice: Make Falcon BMS a payware .
Arty is completely right with this picture: Falcon BMS WILL NEVER BECOME a real diamond without needs of serious pressure; maybe an emerald but not a diamond for sure if developing approach is going on the current way and pace.+1
It’s a shame not to listen to the needs of users on Falcon4 BMS, such as rearming.:tape: -
Nacy create a vote and ask how many want it.
Cause a few said so can’t establish a case as granted by the majority.
Also cause we don’t know the priority list of the BMS team , doesn’t mean that some user demand is in higher priority than the dev’s priority.Στάλθηκε από το MI 5 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
-
Nacy create a vote and ask how many want it.
Arty you can make the same request to vote how many do not want it rearmed.
-
Cause a few said so can’t establish a case as granted by the majority.
The majority of dev’s?
-
Also cause we don’t know the priority list of the BMS team , doesn’t mean that some user demand is in higher priority than the dev’s priority.
The priority list of the BMS team, to rearm: it will not happen. https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?31670-Rearming-at-ongoing-missions&highlight=REARM
The demand of some users to rearm: it will not happen. https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?31670-Rearming-at-ongoing-missions&highlight=REARM
The priority of the developer to rearm an F16: it will not happen. https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?31670-Rearming-at-ongoing-missions&highlight=REARMAs said before Kal-El, and he is right.
And because of this arrogance coming out off your nose and ears you are not really willingly to listen to users needs; mainly just defending and spreading your own approaches. -
If the devs stopped today I would still have a wonderful sim to fly for years to come. Everything new we get is just bonus material IMO…but, they haven’t stopped and are working on a release of 4.34 in 3-4 weeks, so lets just see what they have in store for us, shall we?
I agree whole heartedly.