Really low FPS help
-
lol lol and lol this is serius drama here
-
Well actually u r funny man. U increase vertical resolution to 1600 and hz to 175 and you want to have more than 120 fps.
I mention vertical only cause it’s more painful for vga to cope with.
Lower your resolution or what mav-jp told you to get higher fps. And if you have 55fps more what’s the difference? You will not be able to count all the bullets coming out of the Vulcan?
U r exaggerating man. Even your eye can’t tell the difference from 120 to 175. Hardly you would understand the difference from 90fps to 120fps.Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T818A using Tapatalk
-
Wait? What?
‘As low as 120 ….’ ?!?! And you need ‘help’ with ‘really low FPS’?
Consider yourself blessed.
I think you’re being sarcastic and this is really a ‘look at my new system specs’ post.
In which case, “Great system specs dude. Congrats.”
I was thinking that very same thing . . . With my system I’m getting 80 - 90 FPS with most of the bells and whistles turned on and that seems to work just fine to me
-
… Even your eye can’t tell the difference from 120 to 175. Hardly you would understand the difference from 90fps to 120fps.
That is entirely subjective! Everyone is NOT created equal - we all have different physical reaction times, and varying levels of visual acuity and perception. And the type of display enters into it as well, in addition to display mode features, etc.
-
That is entirely subjective! Everyone is NOT created equal - we all have different physical reaction times, and varying levels of visual acuity and perception. And the type of display enters into it as well, in addition to display mode features, etc.
Yes we are. Read again what I wrote please.
Στάλθηκε από το MI 5 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
-
First world problems here people…
-
That is entirely subjective! Everyone is NOT created equal - we all have different physical reaction times, and varying levels of visual acuity and perception. And the type of display enters into it as well, in addition to display mode features, etc.
If the the fps counter was not invented he would not post ,his perception is that he sees 120 fps not that his game is not fluent . Difference between 120 fps or 175 or 90 is not the subject here nor the capability of a person that in human eye above 60 fps the difference is hardly noticable .
-
Reducing resolution to 800600 or 640480 may help.
-
That is entirely subjective! Everyone is NOT created equal - we all have different physical reaction times, and varying levels of visual acuity and perception. And the type of display enters into it as well, in addition to display mode features, etc.
reaction time at 8ms ?
ROFLMAO
-
hi all,
my fps sometimes rise as high as 12 (twelve).
best regards. -
reaction time at 8ms ?
ROFLMAO
actually, I was referring to physical reaction times, where the human average is around 180ms. Was said above, kinda derailing this thread going down that road… just so you don’t think I’m completely insane, I’ll say that I’m on about the fact that some folks by nature and even by the display they use will be able to notice things on nearly a Tyler Durden film cut “couple frames are wrong” level, usually ending up in a different “feel” over a short time if not immediately perceptible. A display is only a massive technological magic trick to make us think we’re observing a moving reality, as we all know. Constantly dropping or skipping frames, going from a high rate to a lower rate (a jump of more than 40FPS) are all well tested and shown to be perceptible to certain players consistently. Apples and oranges comparing a twitch-game about spinning around and leveling crosshairs on an attacker versus a flight sim, but the general concept stands. We’re not created equal, and what feels smooth and unchanging to one person can be due to a number of individual personal factors even if that person is capable of detecting the different.
Talking everything from distractions of input in the game, tasks they are performing at the time, and the general distraction of the mind (or lack thereof) as our mind occasionally wanders SQUIRREL!! to places we’re not focused on. The only point to buy better gear and to tinker in our control panel options, and in-game graphics options, etc. is to correct and improve the magic tricks that fool our eyes. If we notice we’re not getting fooled properly, it’s back to the drawing board. You could drop to a low frame state and not know “why” the game feels different now, plenty enough to distract us from that if we don’t want to allow ourselves to be pulled out of any current immersion in a given game - but the fact stands that depending on the person/gear, the brain can tell, and that can translate to feel or sometimes visually noticeable changes.
I tell you, every single time I get some rare driver fail to where my 144Hz panel gets dropped in the OS to 75 or 90, I notice within a few seconds. (luckily learned a method to re-init it without restarting windows 10). We’re not all equal in perception. And that video game you’re watching is not moving at all - just a ton of 2 dimensional pictures coming at you to trick your eyes. Technology and improvements in it, and the money spent do develop it, are not wasted after we reached the 120Hz TN panel.
-
I can definitely feel the difference between 60 FPS on my 4k and 144 FPS on my 1080p monitor, but I don’t feel there’s any appreciable value in the increase over 60FPS for a flight sim especially if you’re using trackir. Lol at Really Low at 120 FPS Congrats on your super rig.
-
My two cents.
OP’s original question seemed 100% legit to see if anyone had any advice to help him get the best graphic experience he could. Put a smile on my face regarding the “Really Low FPS” claim whether intended as a joke or not.
Pegasus’s joke was legit funny and not in any way condescending.
Personally, I couldn’t care less about the “perceivable” or “not perceivable” debate other than I’d hope folks would be charitable in interpreting the intentions and arguments of each other as it goes back and forth.