BMS status rant
-
You know, there is information in there that might be interesting to other folks as well.
I disagree on that one.
I won’t go into details here of course but we, as a team, have definately no reason to defend ourselfes!Polaris,
I was rather tempted to post something that would earn me a couple of weeks of break from this forum but
at a second glance I refer from that.You have obviously NO clue about what is going on INSIDE the team. And that’s ok.
What I really dislike is your attitude and rant you’ve made despite you don’t know anything!I tell you something:
First, If you are really so frustrated about BMS, heck, go fly DCS F-16 and tell us about your experience
Second, why the hell do you think, that over 40 pilots (which makes it probably the biggest BMS LAN in the world)
attend to the Buchenau LAN since years? Yes, socialising. But do you really think they show up if BMS is unflyable?I think your squadron mate has a better attitude to approach things.
TLTR:
Big dislike!Disgusting!
-
now I’m missing Max Waldorf….
c’mon guys relax and enjoy… let’s not spoil the honeymoon period of U2.
we know what efforts our great Devs are putting in… if some1 is feeling broke then take a break, relax and rejoin. don’t hold grudge. we all love u guys. -
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?42453-Bitchin-Betties-Club&p=577730#post577730
for all those who love BMS so much that it hurts. enjoy and love BMS
-
now I’m missing Max Waldorf….
c’mon guys relax and enjoy… let’s not spoil the honeymoon period of U2.
we know what efforts our great Devs are putting in… if some1 is feeling broke then take a break, relax and rejoin. don’t hold grudge. we all love u guys.Hi Victor, not sure if your response was aimed at my response… I have no hard feelings, I tried to make my response as polite and direct as possible.
It is important for people to know that they can give feedback. At least from my side, I’m not here to be flattered. Direct feedback, based on facts and evidences are very helpful. Speculating on things is a different thing. Enough, anyway
-
Hi Victor, not sure if your response was aimed at my response… I have no hard feelings, I tried to make my response as polite and direct as possible.
It is important for people to know that they can give feedback. At least from my side, I’m not here to be flattered. Direct feedback, based on facts and evidences are very helpful. Speculating on things is a different thing. Enough, anyway
Update 2 is the most stable and high performance update i have ever seen in bms…
The bms team done the right thing with this update:stabalization and optomization.
Not 1 ctd in either kto itself or balkans.Polaris give the team a proper insite of what your problem is and that way the dudes might be able to sort out your problems.
The dam sim is 23 years old and the only sim that gives us a real look at the what the real pilots see.
Thx to this latest update we can now fly the old girl as intended…
The poll in the other thread shows us that u2 has worked for most of us.
Let the devs help u out man?
-
Hi Victor, not sure if your response was aimed at my response… I have no hard feelings, I tried to make my response as polite and direct as possible
nope. it was just a general comment to dilute the tension…. community and specially me already owe you alot for keeping us informed through the whole process of U2
-
This thread is just bovine excrement. If you don’t like BMS 4.35 then I would suggest you demand a refund (oh wait, BMS is free! Duh), go back to 4.34 until a perfect version exists of BMS, go to DCS (and pay through for really half baked releases like the F-16… oh sorry, it’s okay when we label it “early access”) or stop whining and start coding yourself.
I have nothing to do with BMS but software development is my career and has been for over 23 years - so I can somewhat comprehend the massive challenge behind changing the underlying graphics engine and overall architecture to DX11. This is a watershed release and I fully anticipated bugs and issues.
And I’m really appreciative of the BMS team being very open regarding the fixes, especially U2. BMS 4.35 is a major step forward in underlying architecture even when the sim looks exactly the same as 4.34. But 4.34 seemed as good as it was ever going to get on DX9 and we have a platform to move on with.And all thanks to a team of people around the globe who do this all in their spare time, after work and in between family commitments.
Some appreciation and thanks would be in order here and most of all - patience and understanding. Stop acting like some 13 year old Tik Tok “star” who wants everything NOW and can’t deal with the realities of life.
-
This thread is just bovine excrement. If you don’t like BMS 4.35 then I would suggest you demand a refund (oh wait, BMS is free! Duh), go back to 4.34 until a perfect version exists of BMS, go to DCS (and pay through for really half baked releases like the F-16… oh sorry, it’s okay when we label it “early access”) or stop whining and start coding yourself.
I have nothing to do with BMS but software development is my career and has been for over 23 years - so I can somewhat comprehend the massive challenge behind changing the underlying graphics engine and overall architecture to DX11. This is a watershed release and I fully anticipated bugs and issues.
And I’m really appreciative of the BMS team being very open regarding the fixes, especially U2. BMS 4.35 is a major step forward in underlying architecture even when the sim looks exactly the same as 4.34. But 4.34 seemed as good as it was ever going to get on DX9 and we have a platform to move on with.And all thanks to a team of people around the globe who do this all in their spare time, after work and in between family commitments.
Some appreciation and thanks would be in order here and most of all - patience and understanding. Stop acting like some 13 year old Tik Tok “star” who wants everything NOW and can’t deal with the realities of life.
Well said.
-
“Praise in public, but criticize in private” has been one of my leading guidelines when working with the bachelor students and colleagues in our IT department, and it’s never failed me
All the best,
Uwe
-
“Praise in public, but criticize in private” has been one of my leading guidelines when working with the bachelor students and colleagues in our IT department, and it’s never failed me
All the best,
Uwe
And he does. I have several dozens of firing PM from Hoover, I sometimes don’t free my inbox quickly enough for them.
I’m kidding of course.
-
now I’m missing Max Waldorf…
Don’t worry, I am never really far!
Enjoying some well deserved time off though@Polaris
To conclude on this rant and taking my moderator hat :
- Rants need to be constructive.
- Points raised should be facts and not feelings
- Never forget the team worked hard to bring those updates and new functionalities
- Don’t forget we are human beings. We laugh, we cry and we bleed… Criticism can take a toll on some and to their pride of the work they have done…
So…
There is nothing more to say especially when what we do is on our free time and for 0…BMS isn’t dead and far from it, It won’t be perfect (and will never be).
Now take a break, comeback later (or don’t)… We will be there anyway because we love what do and we try to share it.
Our recent “openness” to the community over U2 is because we also need positive and constructive feedback.
Now, summer is here, 24 /7 servers are open, enjoy flying and move along this thread.
Max out!