Solved [4.36] new aircraft bug
-
@ccc1tw Thanks for the A-6E/EA-6B, I’ll take care of these one
For the J-20, th AAR problem is not the most critical bug… I do not think we can converge this a/c in 4.36
For the Yak-38, it has been tuned to have tires on deck (of the Kuz…), so may be not easy to have it also on ground, I hav’nt tried the nozzles for a while, but they use to work like the AV-8 ones, I’ll try to have a look
For no-AFM ac, do you have an example of an a/c tha’s rotation speed is known much lower than 150Kts and refuse to lift its fron wheel ? (because all non OFM a/c I sually fly have rotation spees at 150Kts or above, so I did not notice such an issue)
-
@ccc1tw Thanks for the A-6E/EA-6B, I’ll take care of these one
Jagaur Gr3 and Jag A need spoiler edit in fm to work.
For the J-20, th AAR problem is not the most critical bug… I do not think we can converge this a/c in 4.36
hmm… when pulling high G, the fm makes it hit an AOA limit and bounce back abruptly.
For no-AFM ac, do you have an example of an a/c tha’s rotation speed is known much lower than 150Kts and refuse to lift its fron wheel ? (because all non OFM a/c I sually fly have rotation spees at 150Kts or above, so I did not notice such an issue)
no. i mean non-AFM ac cannot lift nose wheel above 150kt…until 200kt. my test example is Su-34. when loadout clean, it can start rotate above 150kt. when loadout default for AI in TE, much heavier yet within MTOW, it refuses to lift nose wheel above 150kt.
BTW minor cosmetic bugs…
F-4 series, wheels slightly above ground.
Jag Gr3 and Jag A, main landing gear wheels into ground - gear compression issue?
Q-5N/II main wheels above ground.
-
A-6E/EA-6B/Jaguar A and Jaguar Gr3 spoiler issues are fixed
Jaguar A and Jaguar Gr3 and F-4 incorrect wheel/ground position are fixed
Yak-38 issue is under investigation
Q-5N/II main wheels above ground is not reproduced
BTW some non-AFM a/c, even heavily loaded can rotate before 150Kts, so there may be an issue specific to Su-34
-
yak-38 : nozzle/ lift engine lid/exhaust door not working…
those moving parts use DOF 37 > tail hook.
use DOF 95 and done. -
su-35 model :
IIRC the ac uses TEF/ailerons like F-16. the outer section of TEF is not movable.
it can be fixed by re-assigning DOF numbers and zero aileron angles.
-
B-52H model:
the elevator DOFs are reversed.
BTW superb work- cool gear and spoiler details.
-
i just check RF-4E. spoilers not work.
fm edit fixes it.
i didn’t check other f-4 variants, probably need the same fix.
-
check A-6E and EA-6B,
now i realize both use earlier lods. so wing folding linked to canopy DOF and gear doors missing.models aside, i cannot land them on the carrier. one gear touches the deck, ac explores. it probably need AFM to fix.
-
@ccc1tw all F-4 spoilers need to be fixed, already done for all F-4*, but thanks to remind RF-4…
For A-6 human carrier landing, I fear you’re right, so will not be fixed. -
F-104 model bugs…
F-104C : rudder and elevator are not animated on model.
F-104G, J, DJ : elevator ok, rudder not working.
all F-104 dragchute not working. need fm edit:
dragChuteCd 0.000
-
F-104S in Balkan mod :
Rudder not working. dragchute needs fm edit.
-
WD-1 UAV bug:
aileron direction reversed > remove reversed DOF direction and angle limits in model.
tilted tailflats - only work as aileron, direction reversed. the tailflat control surfaces act as combination of elevator and rudder, can use nested DOFs to simulate it.
all wheels not turnning > uncheck use max/min DOF angle.
nose gear steering direction reversed, DOF should be 5, not 4.
main wheels sink into ground. need fm edit.
HUD shows fuel low flashing on taxiway…
-
MQ-9 :
aileron direction reversed.
V-tail control surfaces can use nesting DOF for both rudder and elevator control.
wheels not turning > need fm edit, add some values to
animGearMaxComp1 0.300 animGearMaxExt1 0.300
BTW WD-1 EO turrnet can use DOF93, like MQ-9.
-
MV-22 :
when throttle 100%, the propeller disc disappear.
BTW, since this is a very high poly model, i think it deserves to…
- have animated rudder and elevator.
- add rear ramp?
- engine nacelles use DOF 95/ like AV-8 nozzle. set fm as VSTOL ac. nesting DOF4 on nacelles may provide yaw control at low speed.
-
Mig-21F-13 :
the ac CoG is outside fuselage. it makes the ac rolls along an axis outside the ac axis.
boarding ladder placed too high. should touch the ground.
all wheels turn reverse direction. all wheels DOF numbers need to be re-assigned.
main wheels sink into ground.
no wingtip, nav, and landing lights.
-
@drtbkj said in [4.36] new aircraft bug:
CCC, if I may make a request…It would be helpful if you let us know over in our Discord.
Hello,
You are not responsible of the support of my models, thanks.
To all, thanks for your feebacks. I will fix them as much as I could.
&Topolo, please call me, we will find a way to update Yak-38.
Radium
-
@Radium Ah, I begin to see where I touched a nerve with what you quoted. Let me make something very clear. The OFM is very careful NOT to take credit and/or “steal” yours or anyone else’s work. We truly want to work with people, not over them. But, I ask you to understand something as well. The OFM formed when a Dev said, on the Forum, that he wished a third party would come in and help with the “other jets”. That’s why our name is the Other Fighters’ Mafia. So, when someone comes in with an Other Jet problem we ask for specifics so maybe we can help. We had no idea it was your model.
I’m writing this reply for a simple reason. It is to tell you, or any other Model or Theater Dev, that if we unknowingly encroach or anything you or they are personally working on, simply tell us and we will happily back off. What’s important is that the Other jets get the “love” they deserve, not who does the work. -
@drtbkj we encourage community contribution but that doesn’t change the fact that you should get in touch with the original author before working on an asset.
By agreement, BMS gets the full rights on given materials but property remains to the original authors.
You are not BMS, so you’re not exempt from contacting authors and if you have a doubt, you can either search in the forums or contact the BMS team to see if we know.
Hope this clarifies and sets ground for good collaboration grounds.
Cheers
-
@MaxWaldorf said in [4.36] new aircraft bug:
@drtbkj we encourage community contribution but that doesn’t change the fact that you should get in touch with the original author before working on an asset.
By agreement, BMS gets the full rights on given materials but property remains to the original authors.
You are not BMS, so you’re not exempt from contacting authors and if you have a doubt, you can either search in the forums or contact the BMS team to see if we know.
Hope this clarifies and sets ground for good collaboration grounds.
Cheers
Hi, Max, and thanks. Just for clarification, we do contact original author’s we know of . In fact, ask Bad Boy. The point I was trying to make was that we did not know Radium was involved, hence my general statement.
Joe. -
@drtbkj Hello,
Maybe you could just check here :
https://forum.falcon-bms.com/category/66/3d-models
I thought I communicated too much, but maybe not enough, in the end.
Cheers,
Radium