Offering materials to BMS…
-
-
http://screamer.alt-world.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/dark-helmet.jpg
What!?!
Hahahahaha love Space balls!!!
-
Let’s fix this thread…
marerials = materials
-
-
-
If you want to offer your C-130, it must have LODs and of course, comply with BMS requirements.
If you do not want to create all the LOD … BMS could (maybe) make them, but in that case we need the .max files.
…
Anyway no worries … Radium will probably start his own C-130 … and we will have all what we (BMS) need without any fears of “troubles” or risks misunderstandings.
The post by me on this thread was really only to let known there is a full 3d model and pit for c130 and a/c130. I put it out there so nobody had to spend 300+ hrs making a NEW c130. Why 2 3d models?
BUT, if you have a poly maker at whim, then have at it.
-
These “hurdles” have been encountered by many others and, arguably, solutions have been found.
Look here and scroll down to licenses types.
IMO, in this situation the “Attribution CC BY” or “Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC” licenses would fit best.At no point would the creator loose rights to continue to work on and update his original creation.
-
These “hurdles” have been encountered by many others and, arguably, solutions have been found.
Look here and scroll down to licenses types.
IMO, in this situation the “Attribution CC BY” or “Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC” licenses would fit best.At no point would the creator loose rights to continue to work on and update his original creation.
GPL is also another great license candidate
-
This is why…again…I’m offering my services…;)…okay nevermind… You guys know how to reach me.
-
I am only involved in a prospective work about the C-130. I trust this piece of work needs time to get prepared before startup, to avoid what is happening right now. What I see is only giving BMS the model they exactly need. I won’t hide my wish to join, one day, if they need me, BMS team, as a 3D artist. I am absolutely not intetested to keep things I work on with passion for myself only. Moreover, regarding the standardization policy BMS initiated, I am modeling beyond their rules, because I want to give my work the best compatibility with what exists already. When the F-2 or the C-130 will be given to BMS as a gift from me (and team mates, if there is) , they can do everything they want with it, as long as this is freeware. My 3D models have no reason to exist, if not designed for a proper integration within BMS software. I have a life outside of BMS which is a game only as I see it ; as a former flight officer in the french air force, I flought real fighter aircrafts, right now, BMS is a great entertainement ; fishing, playing soccer or modeling looks very same to me. So I am not interested to spend time on licence things : I do, BMS achieve what they want with it, simply.
-
About BMS intergration…
Give, or give not.
But no licence blahblah … If it is to loose time dealing with licence stuff, we will be faster by doing the models ourselves without worying about licence stuff.
-
About BMS intergration…
Give, or give not.
But no licence blahblah … If it is to loose time dealing with licence stuff, we will be faster by doing the models ourselves without worying about licence stuff.
This was exactly what I meant.
And this is the reason why what is done (I speak for myself, because I indirectly started this topic) by me is given to BMS with the full authority.
Because what I do has no reason to exist without BMS.
Regards,
Radium
-
About BMS intergration…
Give, or give not.
But no licence blahblah … If it is to loose time dealing with licence stuff, we will be faster by doing the models ourselves without worying about licence stuff.
hopefully we didnt put a licence on every line of code we wrote in BMS ! LOOOOOL
my opinion : i find it disappointing to see people "even thinking of licence or rights " when BMS provides >6 years of work for free without any DB lock….
Giving is giving, taking it back is stealing
-
Because what I do has no reason to exist without BMS.
Regards,
Radium
This is the best thing I read since I landed on this forum. No offense for anyone.
Keep you art ( a present from nature ) and share it.
Sorry for OT.
Regards
-
hopefully we didnt put a licence on every line of code we wrote in BMS ! LOOOOOL
my opinion : i find it disappointing to see people "even thinking of licence or rights " when BMS provides >6 years of work for free without any DB lock….
Giving is giving, taking it back is stealing
whilst I support BMS’ decision to only accept others work given full permissions to use it, I dont see your point here. People want to protect their work - I recall reading of the last time a falcon flavor used others work without permission, and charged for their product… people were not happy.
given that BMS release their work under a fairly specific license, it seems reasonable to me for others to release their work under their own set of terms and conditions. given they do so however, it seems fair in turn for BMS to make their own decision on whether those terms and conditions are appropriate to include anothers work in the sim.
-
it seems reasonable to me for others to release their work under their own set of terms and conditions.
As said previously: Give, or give not. No conditions needed.
Otherwise, materials will simply remains under full original author authority via external mods.
Nobody is forced to share or offer anything to BMS… We are just saying in this thread that, if ppl want to contributes, it is without conditions, otherwise we will prefer to do without.
-
I seen this coming, “and that’s all I have to say about that”, “run Forest run”
Well, for now……
:munch:
-
Otherwise, materials will simply remains under full original author authority via external mods.
And no support from BMS me think’s Dee-Jay
-
Morning Shad
-