WIP: Dassault Rafale
-
Also an Internal weapons bay for low drag stealthy operations
One thing about the F-106 that’s slightly NOT great is the view from the pit (Cage) - even after they removed the bar from the top of the canopy - it was a bomber interceptor really.If there were plans to do an IRST for new fighters like Rafale - then you could adapt that to older aircraft you would think……
-
Hayab,
I really appreciate the work you made, it’s so rare to see a french fighter in BMS, however, I would recommand some aspects to modify in the mesh, to make it look perfect. Moreover, I’d be delighted to make the 3D cockpit for you, if you accept this kind of collaboration.
Thank you for your lovely work,
Radium
-
I would recommand some aspects to modify in the mesh, to make it look perfect.
Huh? … can you explain that, please. I can’t see any mesh errors.
Cheers,
LS -
BTW, those MAU pylons are far more successful than any F-16 or other system in the history of Falcon! lol
-
Huh? … can you explain that, please. I can’t see any mesh errors.
Cheers,http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f82/lazystone/Smileys/hat_3.gif
LSI noticed some little mistakes on the canopy, but also on the refuel drogue and the canards… But I pretty worry to write this publicly, I feel this kind of statements can drive people crazy, so, I am not sure I should send detailed recommendations in PM or mentioned them here…
It’s always difficult to criticize somebody’s work… I don’t like to make this, but Rafale is my national fighter, I saw 2 yesterday, so, like with the F-2, I have something personal with it…
Cheers,
Radium
-
… IMO … Hayab takes all remarks in considerations.
Then … if it i easy and quick to modify, IMO he will do it. If not and if need a total refinement of the main body, I do not think it worth the the effort (or maybe later).
Up to him. Anyway … from my personal POV, the model is much more than “acceptable”.
-
… IMO … Hayab takes all remarks in considerations.
Then … if it i easy and quick to modify, IMO he will do it. If not and if need a total refinement of the main body, I do not think it worth the the effort (or maybe later).
Up to him. Anyway … from my personal POV, the model is much more than “acceptable”.
Sure, but, acceptable and perfect are different!
And,
I trust Hayab is working for perfection!
-
That is by far the best looking model i have seen! Nice work…
-
-
@Hellmaker2a:
Nice informations about rafale…
http://blogs.ottawacitizen.com/2014/03/05/the-rafale-as-canadas-next-fighter-part-1/
http://blogs.ottawacitizen.com/2014/03/05/the-rafale-as-canadas-next-fighter-part-2/
http://blogs.ottawacitizen.com/2014/03/07/the-rafale-as-canadas-next-fighter-part-3/Hé hé … Thank you Hellmaker!
-
No news?
Need more pictures!!
-
Hayab, any news on your model ?
Think of all the French community waiting to ride their national pride
Thanks in advance !
-
3 - 4 Weeks.
-
-
The problem with these Rafale is these are Navy ones… This is the problem…
The second problem is these Rafale are single seaters… This is another problem…
Jokefull yours!
Radium
-
-
-
The problem with these Rafale is these are Navy ones… This is the problem…
The second problem is these Rafale are single seaters… This is another problem…
Jokefull yours!
Radium
And the third one: it’s a Rafale.:p
-
Toro, @ 43:20
“La mission peut parfois requérir un ravitaillement en vol. Cet exercice ne comporte bien sûr aucune difficulté”
(Translation : missions can require air refueling, an exercise which obviously doesnt offer any difficulties)Well f*ck you too, dear comment track. :mrgreen:
-
très bien monsieur