Threshold Speed
-
5 pages about this!
… Train to land your F-16 without this (so essential for too many virtual F-16 pilots) HUD by using only the indexer and you will never have any more questions about FPM and bracket stuff … eveything will become much easier.
-
Mav-jp, I see how the AOA bracket is a dynamic symbol. It scales and stretches based on the AOA or FPM position. The top mark is always 11° and the bottom 15° but the position of the marks relative to the gun cross aren’t fixed. It’s compressed which is plain to see simply because the staple isn’t 4° tall compared to the pitch ladder despite representing values 4° apart. Doubly interesting I thought the top mark was fixed 11° depressed from the gun cross that it was possible in strong winds for the top mark to represent an angle that wasn’t the same as AOA. This turns out to not be the case. The staple actually shows AOA. It’s entirely possible to be at 11° AOA and the angular distance between the FPM and the gun cross to be more (headwind) or less (tailwind).
I still disagree with Stevie’s statement that the correct AOA changes based on weight. The indicators always align and illuminate at the same values of AOA if the plane is at 25,000 lbs. or 45,000 lbs. The AOA indicators are fixed in numerical value just not display position.
I did find that the cockpit gauge & indexer indicates about 0.55° less AOA than the info bar and HUD bracket. If the AOA gauge shows 11.0° the indexer is right on the transitions between lights but the HUD bracket and info bar will show 11.5-11.6°.
One thing I never studied closely is the behavior of the FPM beyond 13° in landing mode. I always thought the “X” meant the FPM was off the HUD only. However if AOA is 14° it gets the X even if the FPM is still displayed on the HUD as a valid path indicator. Additionally the AOA bracket is still reliable in the 13-15° range even if the FPM isn’t valid for path. If you want to fly a 14° approach you would place the FPM 75% down the bracket despite the FPM having a superimposed “X”.
-
Of course the correct landing AOA does not depend on weight. The speed to get this AOA depends on weight!!
That is why we don’t give a shit to speed or weight when landing. If you have correct AOA and slope you are just good to land.
Speed only matters then for runway length and brake energy
-
AoA depends on speed and speed to get this aoa depends on weight: conclusion aoa depends on weight!
Knowing the speed in advance by means of a formula like a the original poster showed is valuable, maybe not to all, but to some.
Those graphs do exist for the real deal for a reason. -
No, that is incorrect. You aim to land at a given, constant AoA. Your AoA varies with a number of things, but ideal landing AoA does not vary with GW.
Knowing the speed in advance is part of the procedure - you should be able to cross check the speed against your actual speed to ensure the systems are working correctly.
Given that cockpit G is 1, AoA varies with weight and speed. As speed rises, AoA falls - and as weight falls, AoA falls.
Actual AoA then depends on weight. The ideal AoA to land at does not depend on weight. However to set the correct AoA will require varying speed based on weight.
-
Cool, so can we say that this formula is usable? Given the limitations and incorrect weights etc of the sim?
-
The Bracket (it is not a E ) is not inverted at all, It is totally logical that the more AOA you have , the more the FPM is goind DOWN the bracket , how could it be otherwise ???
NOw the question is : is the AOA indexer (the one in colors left of the HUD ) inverted in up / center / down position vs what would be needed in term of action.
i would say YES eveything is logic
Yellow = AOA too low , arrow up : PULL (increase AOA)
Green = AOA OK , CIRCLE : do nothing
red = AOA to high , arrow down : PUSH (reduce AOA)that means the F16 indexer has to be seen more as a STICK ACTION than a THROTTLE action and colors fits the AOA indicator stripe
PERIOD.From that perspective indeed, the NAVY AOA indexer is not working the same , IIRC colors are not the same and arrows are about THROTTLE ACTION rather than STICK action…
IMHO , i prefer the logic of the F16 : RED = DANGER AOA too HIGH
PS : for your information , if the Bracket Moves down from a certain AOA , this is only because of a problem of Scaling between the bracket (from 10 to 15 IIR) and the HUD degree values and visibility . Indeed, the Bracket size is NOT 5 degrees but 2.5 degrees (it would be huge in the hud ), so to scale the AOA on the Bracket, the Bracket has to move down with FPM from a certain AOA …In reality, the bracket is not associated with the HUD or Ladde but only with FPM. The logic says : AOA = 10 : put the Bracket top on the FPM , AOA 15, put the bracket Bottom on the FPM , and interpolate between those positions for AOA between 10 and 15…no matter where the FPM is on HUD
…it’s backwards…every USN Test Pilot I know that has flown the Viper agrees that it is backwards. From their training…and I agree with them.
-
5 pages about this!
… Train to land your F-16 without this (so essential for too many virtual F-16 pilots) HUD by using only the indexer and you will never have any more questions about FPM and bracket stuff … eveything will become much easier.
Actually very good gouge…
-
AoA depends on speed and speed to get this aoa depends on weight: conclusion aoa depends on weight!
Yes, given a speed and weight (and some other stuff) the AOA the airplane adopts naturally is determined by these. We’re confusing the AOA that results from given inputs with the desired AOA. We’re saying the desired AOA for approach is constant. I’m at 30,000 lbs. what AOA do I want on landing? 11°. I’m flying at Mach 1.3 at 31,528’ inverted, what AOA do I want on approach? 11°. There’s a 4 knot headwind… 11° AOA. You see that no matter what the airplane is doing, the AOA that we strive for is unchanging.
Cool, so can we say that this formula is usable? Given the limitations and incorrect weights etc of the sim?
I think so. If you didn’t have reference to AOA indications (HUD, horn, gauge, indexer) at all and had to use a computed approach speed this rule of thumb would likely allow a safe landing. Would it be exactly precise? No. Would it be close enough for landing distance and brake energy calculations? Yes.
-
Yes, given a speed and weight (and some other stuff) the AOA the airplane adopts naturally is determined by these. We’re confusing the AOA that results from given inputs with the desired AOA. We’re saying the desired AOA for approach is constant. I’m at 30,000 lbs. what AOA do I want on landing? 11°. I’m flying at Mach 1.3 at 31,528’ inverted, what AOA do I want on approach? 11°. There’s a 4 knot headwind… 11° AOA. You see that no matter what the airplane is doing, the AOA that we strive for is unchanging.
Yes indeed, I think most on here agree that what you desire for AOA to land the viper and how to achieve that are two different things. My comment was regarding that for whatever AOA yo desire, you need to fly a certain speed that is dictated by weight among other things.
I for one think it’s useful to know how to calculate that approach speed, regardless of HUD failures etc. So I thank the OP for this and you Frederf for “confirming” the method.
-
and poor Red Dog doesnt get a thank you, for including it in your install folder?
-
and poor Red Dog doesnt get a thank you, for including it in your install folder?
Including the formula? I must have missed it then. What doc and what page is it on?
-
It’s got some interesting information in it and people might find it useful, especially when you lose your HUD in the video game due combat damage.
I tired to make this more obvious in the original post but everyone here is so fast to try shoot anyone else down around here you guys can’t see it. Chill
So much fuss about the bracket that’s not an E or C, when the OP is calling BMS a video game when in fact is a simulator.
Video game = HAWKS :uham: -
Including the formula? I must have missed it then. What doc and what page is it on?
page 9 of the main checklist has the chart, thought the formula was included too but it seems Im mistaken. Which leads me to wonder where Ive seen it before…
-
That’s totally fine. I’ve seen the graph and also the ones you posted here and the vast amount of docs on your site. Guys like you and others on here are doing tremendous work for the community and should be saluted.
-
…it’s backwards…every USN Test Pilot I know that has flown the Viper agrees that it is backwards. From their training…and I agree with them.
You are stubborn
Ibwould say the f18 is backward and every f16 pilot would say the same.
Got the point ? Nobody is right or wrong …two different aircraft two different systems
Personnally i find no logic in f18 indexer ….low AOA is red !!! Come on !!!
-
So much fuss about the bracket that’s not an E or C, when the OP is calling BMS a video game when in fact is a simulator.
Video game = HAWKS :uham:We were waiting for this post.
-
-
Blue you give me inspiration :nosep:
-
You are stubborn
Ibwould say the f18 is backward and every f16 pilot would say the same.
Got the point ? Nobody is right or wrong …two different aircraft two different systems
Personnally i find no logic in f18 indexer ….low AOA is red !!! Come on !!!
Like I said - “from their training”. I was also trained in a Fleet T-45A sim…by Fleet USN Instructors. So it’s backwards.
But I agree with ya…as far as training goes.
As for red for the low AOA in the Hornet - if you’re coming aboard the boat and you are at low AOA - i.e.; fast - and at the wrong pitch - low - you will either skip the hook, break the cable, or possibly impact the deck hard…all of which are BAD. RED = BAD. I spent some time standing on the LSO plat as an observer aboard CVN 72 watching folks from NAS Lemoore CQ…and we had a guy get his legs removed when a cable snapped back when I was working T-45. That was BAD. BAD ain’t good. That’s the logic.