General Atomics MQ-9
-
-
Fascinating!
Does BMS have code to handle unmanned aircraft or will we see a pilot eject when it gets shot down?
you wont see it
-
Projectâs over.
See you for the next one.
Cheers,
Radium
-
Very Nice!
-
How would implementation of âcode for unmanned a/câ seem to be any different in BMs from the perspective of the player? Doesnât a real drone pilot sit in front of a monitor with a keyboard, mouse and HOTAS? It seems to me that itâs effectively modeled, already⌠: P
âŚBtw, thatâs some very nice looking work!
-
âA man on a computer simulating a man on a computer.â âŚ
-
âA man on a computer simulating a man on a computer.â âŚ
Isnât it what we are already doing simulating F16b50/52? Afterall a fighter pilot just pilots computers which pilots itself the aircraftâŚ
-
Isnât it what we are already doing simulating F16b50/52? Afterall a fighter pilot just pilots computers which pilots itself the aircraftâŚ
[Bah âŚ
;)](
) -
@APOLLO:
With a suitable Flight Model and a HUD/SNIPER View it could be a working solution towards simulating UAV/UCAV operations in BMS!! Who knowsâŚ
Any air defense would down without any effortâŚ
No ECM, no dispensers, no flight performanceâŚ
UAV and UCAV have their own role and merits but currently it is not fight against real IADS.
Just remember what happened with the Global Hawk close to shore of Iran. -
Some of you guys need to learn to embrace the change and diversity instead of constantly finding arguments or reasons why this or that shouldnât be there. It is because of unexpected changes that some other areas are going to be developed. Say something nice for a change and stop acting like you guys work at the pentagon.
-
Some of you guys need to learn to embrace the change and diversity instead of constantly finding arguments or reasons why this or that shouldnât be there. It is because of unexpected changes that some other areas are going to be developed. Say something nice for a change and stop acting like you guys work at the pentagon.
I did not say it should not be in the game. But it seems to me simply pointless. Select An-2, fly it and find it your options against air defenseâŚ
I have to say the last DB clean was sadly was a bit too strong. There is no F-4 for USA for '80s theater.None the F-4J, F-4S and F-4E are in the DB now. If you ask me they are far more fits to F4 than MQ-9âŚ
-
I did not say it should not be in the game. But it seems to me simply pointless. Select An-2, fly it and find it your options against air defenseâŚ
I have to say the last DB clean was sadly was a bit too strong. There is no F-4 for USA for '80s theater.None the F-4J, F-4S and F-4E are in the DB now. If you ask me they are far more fits to F4 than MQ-9âŚ
Hello Molni,
Just to make it clear : I work for nobody.
I exported 469 models for BMS since I am in he team. They are from different countries, different eras, different political coalitions.
There is inside a huge number of models for everyone to enjoy.
Cold war is finished. Please just remember this. I am not interested in another NATO vs WAPA simulated conflict. This must stop. I find it extremely insulting for our Russian friends to always be depicted as the bad guys, code-named âREDFORâ, like the evil people.
I will never go in that direction, I hate this view, and I will not proceed to please cold war nostalgia.
My world has France, Japan, Israel, USA, Russia, Swiss, Taiwan, China, South Korea, Germany, UK, Morocco, Spain, Italy, Gabon, Ivory Coast, Niger, Djibouti, Kirghistan⌠And many others⌠This is my world. If this does not please you, itâs the same.
I live in a county which honors USA soldiers, and walk on the Red Square in Moscow, who fights alongside with NATO and will never forget Russian brothers who fought with our fighter pilots for freedom, integrated in Russian squadrons.
So, never expect from me to feed Cold War enthusiasts.
Recently, UCAVs delivered in middle east more weapon that fighter aircraft. MQ-9 is then most relevant in KTO, because this is the present, not a nostalgia era for some, a terrible era in my culture.
Cheers,
Radium
-
Hello Molni,
Just to make it clear : I work for nobody.
I exported 469 models for BMS since I am in he team. They are from different countries, different eras, different political coalitions.
There is inside a huge number of models for everyone to enjoy.
Cold war is finished. Please just remember this. I am not interested in another NATO vs WAPA simulated conflict. This must stop. I find it extremely insulting for our Russian friends to always be depicted as the bad guys, code-named âREDFORâ, like the evil people.
I will never go in that direction, I hate this view, and I will not proceed to please cold war nostalgia.
My world has France, Japan, Israel, USA, Russia, Swiss, Taiwan, China, South Korea, Germany, UK, Morocco, Spain, Italy, Gabon, Ivory Coast, Niger, Djibouti, Kirghistan⌠And many others⌠This is my world. If this does not please you, itâs the same.
So, never expect from me to feed Cold War enthusiasts.
Recently, UCAVs delivered in middle east more weapon that fighter aircraft. MQ-9 is then most relevant in KTO, because this is the present, not a nostalgia era for some, a terrible era in my culture.
Cheers,
Radium
Yes the Cold War is finished. As the Arab-Israeli War but we had Israeli theaters with Cold War conflicts as I can remember.
BTW this means we have lot more data about older stuff as current.And as I have explained many times the engine of the Falcon fits much more to this era from late '70s to early-mid '90s if you exclude some weapon systems. Why? Because the F4.0 simply was created in mid '90s and modeled early 90s scenario with legacy Cold War weapon systems on red side and AIM-120 and F-16C with PGMs But in the DB was not the anti-ARM capable double digit SAMs as I can remember. No S-300Ps, no S-300V, no 9K317 Buk-M1, no 9K331 Tor-M1.
After 15+ more years of further development in F4.0 history the 30-40 year old first multi target engagement SAM systems are still not modeled. Maybe they will one day.
I respect your work just as anybody else but regardless of this I can have my own opinion and priorities. Not because Iâm Cold War lover. Yes, that is also a factor just as the engine and its capability and the combat environment. This is just as matters as taste. What Canuck somehow does not likeâŚ
It looks very nice the MQ-9 and AI can flew just as other airplanes. But if we consider the era of MQ-9 and the threats of conventional battlefield we can conclude even with SEAD and other support the MQ-9 is just a practice target for anybody. It is slow, weak and defenseless.
MQ-9 is a piece of art in COIN (which cannot be modeled with F4.0 engine and terrain today) but it does not have real merits in a large scale conventional warfare. Even the weak air defense of NSWP countries could down 30+ years ago without any issue with Krug, Kub or other legacy SAMs.Maybe my way of thinking is way to âengineerâ.
Some of you guys need to learn to embrace the change and diversity instead of constantly finding arguments or reasons why this or that shouldnât be there. It is because of unexpected changes that some other areas are going to be developed. Say something nice for a change and stop acting like you guys work at the pentagon.
One more remark. This is not the ED forum where other opinions which are not praise the ED are moderated. I wrote what I thing in accordance with forum rules.
-
Keep something in mind friends: IRL, UAVs can only work on good weather (not much clouds on the area), no icing condition, no turbulence, quite limited with the wind on take/off and landing.
Donât know how we will be able to take those limitations in account in game so it could result in some more or less unrealistic situations in the game. -
Iâm only expressing my opinion too. If you got kicked on the ED forum this is your problem. I used the same forum rule as you.
-
Keep something in mind friends: IRL, UAVs can only work on good weather (not much clouds on the area), no icing condition, no turbulence, quite limited with the wind on take/off and landing.
Donât know how we will be able to take those limitations in account in game so it could result in some more or less unrealistic situations in the game.In fact these limitations are also needed for maybe for helos but for very old stone age J-5, J-6 and H-5 also have to consider these. They do not have radar and other eq. to fly at bad weather or at night.
Iâm only expressing my opinion too. If you got kicked on the ED forum this is your problem. I used the same forum rule as you.
I was not kicked. But your attitude was quite similar to ED. I do not get the point of MQ-9 therefore I am a person who has to âsay nice for a change.â
I said many times nice thing. For starter about the 4.34. It simply looks as I wanted to make my MOD*. It accomplished everything what I wanted and even more. Much more. Is that count?
*Except the now discovered missing F-4s.(The wish for âdiversityâ leaded to the case where the DB of the different Falcon was simply a big mess with lots of stuff without chance to be ever usedâŚ)
-
Iâll stop debating here.
Take it if you want, leave it if you want.
btw, Molni, itâs not a question of being an engineer of not, itâs more something cultural, rather than technical.
Remember that I donât work for now, 2020, but for the next 10 years, which is very different.
The wish for âdiversityâ leaded to the case where the DB of the different Falcon was simply a big mess with lots of stuff without chance to be ever usedâŚ
In your world. Your very own world, which is not mine and many other people.
My next project which I already started working on will be even less expected and will probably make more debates. But do you know what ? It is also what pleases me : freedom of speech and action.
-
Radium , just keep it going, you donât care who , what say.
Molni is equal with âegoâ âmeâ âIâ and âmyselfâ words
His point of view if he donât satisfied something then nobody should like it. Because He knows everything because he is an engineerMy only one sadness is that nobody can make a workflow to show the whole process . From make an 3d model from scratch and DOF-ing texturing and import in game. It could help some people to improve some models in game.
-
Radium , just keep it going, you donât care who , what say.
Molni is equal with âegoâ âmeâ âIâ and âmyselfâ words
His point of view if he donât satisfied something then nobody should like it. Because He knows everything because he is an engineerMy only one sadness is that nobody can make a workflow to show the whole process . From make an 3d model from scratch and DOF-ing texturing and import in game. It could help some people to improve some models in game.
You still indulging this type of attitude and then you ask for workflow.
Not from here at least. I already posted somewhere that i really want to help people around here with some tutorials. But then again every more often i see everyone around here punching each other faces.
Why i still get mad with this post? Itâs my own fault.
-
Radium , just keep it going, you donât care who , what say.
Molni is equal with âegoâ âmeâ âIâ and âmyselfâ words
His point of view if he donât satisfied something then nobody should like it. Because He knows everything because he is an engineerMy only one sadness is that nobody can make a workflow to show the whole process . From make an 3d model from scratch and DOF-ing texturing and import in game. It could help some people to improve some models in game.