RWR symble "m" not blink
-
no
you dont have a blinking anymore
By blinking i mean a blinking CIRCLE ….
This leads to a tricky question
a Blinking Circle means “missile activity” , which is used for SAMS or AC launchers of Beam Riders…
Should active missiles have the Circle or not ?..that’s the question
it used to have, now it does not anymore… before calling that a bug, we must refer to experts
I think we will not get real answer though as all of this is not public at all…
-
be aware of another parameter btw
before U1, the <m>was detected by the RWR as soon as the missile turned active, independantly of the RWR sensitivity vs distance of the emitter vs RWR shadow
Now the RWR can potientially detect the <m>AFTER it went active depending on the RWR sensitiviy / missile radar strength and distance</m></m>
-
Good!!!
That’s really challenging, guys you must set your appropriate MAR,otherwise you will be dead if you still rely on your “M” -
Why you have not the lunch button light when there are 2 M on rwr? Is it because the aim 120 have not a semi archive radar or what?
-
Why you have not the lunch button light when there are 2 M on rwr? Is it because the aim 120 have not a semi archive radar or what?
The launch button activates only for beam riders missile launchers , based on the detection of frequency change of the launcher’s radar
-
For the record, the video I was referring to was in 34.0. U1 is then different, hence different experiences in current TvT.
-
:pop2:
-
It is a matter of choice. If RWR library is programed to trigger a launch alarm on active missile radar detection , it will trigger a launch alarm anytime it is detected… of course , even if the missile is not launched at you. Two missile from the same direction could be showed as a single one (average position strength)
-
Two missile from the same direction could be showed as a single one (average position strength)
Not irl, remember radar/flight ID and missile ID? = Different emitting freqs.
Its a whole new playground out there for coders…
-
Two missiles, same type, usng two different chanels … RWR don’t necessarily have enought resolution for proper discrimination if freq (and as ypu know, it is not the only measured parameter) are close enough one from the other. We should not make a specific example a general rule, but still …
What I mean is that RWR is faaaar from being a perfectly reliable tool.