Sukhoi Su-34
-
Hello,
Sukhoi Su-34 project has started !
за ваше здоровье !
LICENSE :
We hereby declare this model to be fully made by myself hands, every vertex or polygon was made by myself, we never used any 3D exterior material to build this Sukhoi Su-34
Third parties are not eligible to request this model to be used in their theater, unless the Sukhoi series are a part of an official BMS release.
CREDITS :
Radium …… Project owner
Topolo …Flight model and dynamics
Mav-JP… Code support, project requester and greatest fan of it
Dee-Jay… Data management
Corsair… Sukhoi 34 family consultant, Russian translator -
-
Radium my friend, my brother ! Your work is simply like art. I truly welcome any of your 3D models to the BMS world. I am very glad that you are up to that complex task !
Keep going my brother !
-
Whoah what a detail!!!
-
-
-
-
Ok, new F-16 model confirmed
No, I just meant, are you referring to stock BMS F-16 or Tomcatz one, or Janhas one ?
Also, what is HL.3 ? Half Life 3 ?
-
What are you refering to ?
That the landing gear of the Su-34 is much more detailed than the current F-16 model in BMS4.34.
-
That the landing gear of the Su-34 is much more detailed than the current F-16 model in BMS4.34.
Yes, then ?
-
I think the molni’s question is: will 4.35’s(?) Su-34 be more detailed than 4.35’s F-16?
It’s reasonable question cause level of details of that gear is outstanding and cannot be compare to nothing we already have seen in current or previous iterations.
-
Yes, then ?
I just wondered that a literally non used plane will (?) have better model than the no.1 flyable plane. Strange.
-
I just wondered that a literally non used plane will (?) have better model than the no.1 flyable plane. Strange.
Most of what I do is strange for you right ?
-
-
I think the molni’s question is: will 4.35’s(?) Su-34 be more detailed than 4.35’s F-16?
It’s reasonable question cause level of details of that gear is outstanding and cannot be compare to nothing we already have seen in current or previous iterations.
IF we have do (maybe someday?) push some limits further away, it is smarter to do it first on “non primary” aircraft. So all the experience gained will be more benefit for “primary” stuff. So to me, it makes perfect sens.
-
I just wondered that a literally non used plane will (?) have better model than the no.1 flyable plane. Strange.
“Life is Strange”, dear Molni… you stated that yourself, as seems
With best regards.
-
IF we have do (maybe someday?) push some limits further away, it is smarter to do it first on “non primary” aircraft. So all the experience gained will be more benefit for “primary” stuff. So to me, it makes perfect sens.
I wonder if/when BMS 3D models start to use rumored multiple-hibox feature. Improved damage visuals (IL2 style) would be really nice to have.
-
IF we have do (maybe someday?) push some limits further away, it is smarter to do it first on “non primary” aircraft. So all the experience gained will be more benefit for “primary” stuff. So to me, it makes perfect sens.
From this POV I understand the function of this plane.
-
Oh … there is no “function” to the plane except that it particularly pleases Jp and Radium.
I just personally think it is indeed better to work from the “lowest” to the “highest” (on that particular cases).
-