Falcon BMS 4.35 U1 Wishlist
-
Hi Tomcatter.
would be unfortunate
What would be really unfortunate is to have no more ppl willing to put the hands in the dirt or breaking things each time because of a DB full of “garbage” being lost among hundreds of similar files with cross reference everywhere … etc …
We were able to find and fix TONS of thing because DB has been cleaned and shortened. It is not to make it again full of “everything” that only a very few % of user do really enjoy on a daily basis.I’m not very interested in the Korean theater, so I like to fly pretending I’m somewhere over Europe or the USA. So I like to have this variety of units/planes to choose from to make my own TE’s and Red Flag type scenario’s etc.
Other theater does includes other variants skins … etc …
Balkans … EMF, ITO, Spain … someday, CET … They are made on purpose. Flying different nations … different a/c , over other countries … etc …One can’t have everything:
- Faster updates, minimums bug, reasonable amount of skins and a/c variant relevant for a given theater.
- Tons of skins, tons of variant of the same a/c, ten pages to scroll down with the mouse-wheel to chose an a/c when creating missions, much more spaced updates, some a/c bugged at hell and/or not polished, tired and discouraged DB devs?
We have to choose. (I’ve made my choice, to me, it is the price of a “faster” work, more efficiency and increased stability).
-
Hi Dee-Jay,
Thanks for your answer. And I agree with you, but is the current stock DB still so full of garbage? For me it wouldn’t be needed to add more planes etc. But It would be nice if we could keep the current planes/variations that are in there now.
I know there are other theaters available, but Korea overall still runs smoothest in my experience. So it would be nice if I don’t necessarily have to switch to Balkans if I want to use F-16 MLU for example. I understand one can’t have everything, but it would be nice if we can keep the selection we have currently.
-
MLU will stay don’t worry.
-
Update the A10 pit to the C model with dual MFDs.
-
Trees and clouds shadows
-
F-15E/C cockpit & flight model please. Hotspots in the 3D cockpit but non is active
-
1.000.000$
-
even more detailed exterior lighting and oxygen system
-
Please make HAD a bit more kind. Having to triangulate is 100% fine, but having to load HARMs and then create a markpoint to get a TGP look on that emitter is just mean.
My suggestion is that selecting an emitter on HAD would move the SPI to the (approximated) emitter position, including all other sensors (just like TMS up with any other SOI would), even if no HARMs are loaded.I mean, HAD is made up anyways and this change wouldn’t make it less plausible. Or do you know that HAD really can’t be used to cue other sensors IRL?
It would be pretty neat too to have a TGT SEP button for HAD or at least . When EWR and FCR stand pretty much right on top of each other (SA-4 in the training mission), selecting the right one is pure luck.
When HARM in HAD or POS mode is selected and no missile is handed off, the TD box, the target locator line and the tadpole are gone. is this intended?
-
Please make HAD a bit more kind. Having to triangulate is 100% fine, but having to load HARMs and then create a markpoint to get a TGP look on that emitter is just mean.
My suggestion is that selecting an emitter on HAD would move the SPI to the (approximated) emitter position, including all other sensors (just like TMS up with any other SOI would), even if no HARMs are loaded.I mean, HAD is made up anyways and this change wouldn’t make it less plausible. Or do you know that HAD really can’t be used to cue other sensors IRL?
It would be pretty neat too to have a TGT SEP button for HAD or at least . When EWR and FCR stand pretty much right on top of each other (SA-4 in the training mission), selecting the right one is pure luck.
When HARM in HAD or POS mode is selected and no missile is handed off, the TD box, the target locator line and the tadpole are gone. is this intended?
maybe i am not informed correctly, or maybe i missed one part, after all I made up the whole HAD ROFLMAO
-
even more detailed exterior lighting
good idea , the real ext light system is actually VERY complex on the last blocks
-
APKWS would be super awesome, BTW.
-
Please make HAD a bit more kind. Having to triangulate is 100% fine, but having to load HARMs and then create a markpoint to get a TGP look on that emitter is just mean.
My suggestion is that selecting an emitter on HAD would move the SPI to the (approximated) emitter position, including all other sensors (just like TMS up with any other SOI would), even if no HARMs are loaded.I mean, HAD is made up anyways and this change wouldn’t make it less plausible. Or do you know that HAD really can’t be used to cue other sensors IRL?
It would be pretty neat too to have a TGT SEP button for HAD or at least . When EWR and FCR stand pretty much right on top of each other (SA-4 in the training mission), selecting the right one is pure luck.
When HARM in HAD or POS mode is selected and no missile is handed off, the TD box, the target locator line and the tadpole are gone. is this intended?
HTS is supposed to be able to cue other sensors, and is supposed to allow PGM employment against stationary emitters. Like, JDAMs from another Link 16 platform, for instance.
What makes you say the HAD is made up?
-
HTS is supposed to be able to cue other sensors, and is supposed to allow PGM employment against stationary emitters. Like, JDAMs from another Link 16 platform, for instance.
What makes you say the HAD is made up?
@TO-BMS1F-16CM-34-1-1:
Note also: AN/ASQ-213 HARM Targeting System (HTS) implementation in BMS is merely a representation of reality.
The real system is highly classified and may work differently.So I thought that the dev team is just guessing how HAD might work and trying to make something plausible. Or is it known how the real HAD MFD page and HUD symbology look like?
-
So I thought that the dev team is just guessing how HAD might work and trying to make something plausible. Or is it known how the real HAD MFD page and HUD symbology look like?
It’s all guessed
-
16:9 Start menu please…
-
-
-
-
My wish is that you guys at the dev team take a break and enjoy your family during the holidays.