I would like to know what are the criteria for the SA17 to engage missiles because I read SA17 has the anti-missile capabilities…but yesterday, I was surprised to see my harms flying over the SA17 areas before falling on the SA10 located behind the SA17s without ever having been threatened by the SA17s…
@suhkoi69 Was the Sa-17 full? any missiles left? Was the LoS ok?
@MaxWaldorf yes , full/ LOS ok I guess
we can see only the SA10 has reacted while nothing for the SA17s
each element of flight had selected only Alic code “110” in POS
here this is the grand final of the fireworks for celebrating the SA10 victory ?! all of Harms have been intercepted…
@suhkoi69 Ah, I see BMS still likes shooting down invisible satellites …
That’s the problem with VLS when loosing lock … of you go to 100000 feet
No wonder sam’s are out of missiles in day1 , hope resupply works. - will keep my eye on that.
Gee, thanks for downvote whomever you are. I couldn’t care less, but I’m just surprised - for this psaki - business.
Anti missile do work - … fine, I’ve made Balkans TE , even some aa guns tried to shoot onto harm (in SA10 unit) … not that it matter…
But, yes it can be improved, !PRIORITIZATION! of targets … don’t know why SA17 tried to shoot outgoing harm … a target, yes, but waste of missile(s)
- about that, it almost seems AA-units in general do not “intercept” missile, fire onto incoming , but fire into outgoing harms, ones that are already flew over them (detection/RCS?) … catchy stuff… need to test that few times more , differently
SA17 also seems to attack planes first … when both in range , harms and planes… and that’s a costly mistake … almost all of our harms hit their targets , of course with plane losses , but also no radars left to defend
Great success, again WF - left without a scratch, other then seeing sa10 fly over right wing …