Weapon Delivery Planner released
-
Hi,
New version of WDP released.
A lot of changed, see the changelog over here:
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?5293-Weapon-Delivery-Planner&p=66013#post66013Thanks to everybody for the feedback/reports and ideas.
Enjoy,
Falcas
-
Huge improvement on an already great utility.
Thanks again.
-
quick question. when i load a tac with a mirage 2000 in the data card i always see the clean fuel capacity although I have loaded external tanks. is it only me? i’m using the latest version.
Thanks
-
quick question. when i load a tac with a mirage 2000 in the data card i always see the clean fuel capacity although I have loaded external tanks. is it only me? i’m using the latest version.
Thanks
Hi Cipher,
WDP writes the “name” what you see in the cockpit.
For the 1300L tank the M2000 is using this is RP522. (Default Korea)
This to save space on the datacard.
Other example: instead of writing 2x R.550 Magic II, you will see 2x MAG.
I see the RP522 on the datacard using the BMS 001 Multinational War mission.gr Falcas
-
sorry I maybe didn’t make my self clear. The issue is that although I have wing tanks loaded in the mirage the take off totals don’t change. I see in my data card that i have 7162 pounds of fuel although i should have close to 14.000 pounds of fuel? it’s like the fuel capacity of any external tanks is not calculated to give a final fuel load.
Thanks again Falcas.
-
Got ya,
Yep, only for the F-16s the fuel is added in the performance part.
Will see if I have some time to do this for other AC as well.Gr Falcas
-
Many thanks!
-
Dear Falcas
I find out one strange problem.Only two airplane in the mission.But it show 1-1,1-2,1-3,1-4 in the weapon
delivery planner.The TCN number is wrong,too.Before the WDP version is ok.The version is seem to have the
problem.
-
Dear Falcas
I find out one strange problem.Only two airplane in the mission.But it show 1-1,1-2,1-3,1-4 in the weapon
delivery planner.The TCN number is wrong,too.Before the WDP version is ok.The version is seem to have the
problem.
The TCN have been changed to show the correct TCN channels that the AI uses.
Gr Falcas
-
The TCN have been changed to show the correct TCN channels that the AI uses.
Gr Falcas
And I thank you for this!
-
Hi falcas,
Now the optimal climbspeed for maximal fuel efficiency is displayed.
Can you als add / make selectable the optimal climbspeed with afterburner? (Like in the preformance tab? )Snowman
-
Hi falcas,
Now the optimal climbspeed for maximal fuel efficiency is displayed.
Can you als add / make selectable the optimal climbspeed with afterburner? (Like in the preformance tab? )Snowman
If you mean in the Datacard… Its already in there. Just click on the yellow label for pitch/AB
Gr Falcas
-
Hi falcas,
I am not talking about takeoffvalues ( abort speed etc) because that ia what you currently have implemented ( very Nice btw)
But after takeoff:
Optimal climbspeed. This is now calclated with buster climb. Can you make it a selector to climb with afterburner?In some cases i do not mind spending a extra 300 pounds or so and be ready for combat flying at altitude several minutes earlier and in a shorter distance. ( for example a homefield close to the FLOT )
-
I can’t get WDP to download . What am I doing wrong?
-
I can’t get WDP to download . What am I doing wrong?
-
Thank you very much for the help!
-
I just updated to 3.6.3 from 3.6.1 and have noticed that my tanker track line boxes aren’t rectangular anymore, I’m getting parallelograms and some are really thin. The preset airspace boxes are still the right shape. Thanks for your many years of work Falcas!
-
Line thickness have change, so that can be that you see thiner lines.
About the parallelograms, I have to look into it.
In the mean time I think you can find the tanker anywayThanks for the heads-up.
Gr Falcas
-
Hehe, yeah I can find them, I was just trying to be a good bug reporter By thin I was refering to the size of the parallelograms, like less than 5 miles from long edge to long edge (short edges seem to be the proper length, just not at a right angle). Thinnest one I have seen is 1 mile wide and 64 miles long.
-
Yep I got what you mean, I can reproduce it here so I know what you mean.
Thanks for the report.Gr Falcas