Hi,
i don’t know of any mismatch between actual terrain and the TFR.
To judge the behaviour one would need an ACMI and the TFR settings used like ride type, cleareance, mode.
cheers
Magic
Hi,
i don’t know of any mismatch between actual terrain and the TFR.
To judge the behaviour one would need an ACMI and the TFR settings used like ride type, cleareance, mode.
cheers
Magic
Hi,
please let us know which theater you are refering to.
Since you said “In KTO or Balkans it is there.”, i assume the problem is confined to a specific theater other than KTO.
Did you apply any other modifications apart from installing the 3rd party theater?
cheers
Magic
Hey,
actually positive Mode IV reply means most of the time friendly (according to ID-matrix).
For hostile ID, lack of any IFF (spades) is usually not enough.
As tiag mentioned, it all depends on the ID-matrix which is layed out in the theater specific ROE.
And btw, you can NOT get a positive reply on all IFF modes. See what the different IFF modes mean.
Modes I, II & 3 are mainly for airspace control agencies which have a list of all flights/aircraft and their respective iff modes (ATO). So they can check if the mode I, II, III are correct. A fighter pilot doesn’t have that list or the time to check it.
cheers
Magic
Hi,
usually there are multiple ways:
Obviously weather is a factor.
With the aforementioned threats i see only one feasable option: HARMs.
Because of the high engagement altitude and capability to launch at <200ft targets.
Of course you need multiple HARM platforms and coordination between aircraft/flights for best success.
Alternatively you need multiple missions to complete the DEAD.
Standoff weapons could also work, but with those mobile units you are always risking a miss because they start moving.
I’m looking forward to hear other pilots advice on this.
cheers
Magic
Ok guys, thx for the info directing to brakes overheat.
But then the published chart for accumulative brakes energy is wrong.
I checked our grossweight, wind and airspeed when brakes were apllied, according to the mentioned chart we are in the green area.
So why brakes overheat when in green area?
https://www.falcon-bms.com/articles/flight-model/changing-the-brakes-model/
cheers
Magic
Hi,
something like described here happened two times in MP to me(us) over the last few days.
In both cases we made a hotpit refuel.
First occasion:
Second Occasion
In both cases we had good landings, Also checked “brakes-chart” to be sure no overheat problem.
Tried to repro in SP, no luck.
cheers
Magic
Hi,
it looks like a DeviceSorting problem.
I highly recommend using the Alterative Launcher to map your Cougar & MFDs. It will take care of the DeviceSorting and is really easy to use.
cheers
Magic
Hi,
try adding “set g_nFontSize XY” in your Falcon BMS User.cfg. XY being 10 for me.
I think that’s what it does.
cheers
Magic
Let me guess, you never had the ACMI-Button depressed (white) in AL?!
Ok, let us know how it goes.
cheers
Magic
Well, i have an idea actually, just verfified it.
Go launch Falcon via AL with the ACMI button depressed.
Open TaskManager, go to Processes tab, enable Command line column (right-click on any column to get context menu), check the options in the commandline for “-acmi”.
If you don’t see the “-acmi” parameter, there’s something porked with AL.
If you do have “-acmi” in the commandline, there’s something wrong with Falcon.
cheers
Magic
So,
i verified again, and the problem is visible in your first screenshot i guess.
Here is how it should look on the server:
In your case, Tucano should connect to Server2 for VHF, but he doesn’t.
Can you provide a screenshot of Tucano’s IVC-Client after connection, as well as his IVC Client.ini?
cheers
Magic
For me the ACMI Button on the AL works with 4.37.3.
Sorry, got no idea how to check your problem.
cheers
Magic
So the IVC-Server looks good.
Please tell us if IVC-VHF works for you and Tucano in Korea Theater.
And to be more precice on the screenshot, follow those steps:
maybe we can pinpoint at which stage the problem is.
cheers
Magic
I was thinking of something like PAKs (just smaller) areas where the risk would be calculated for.
Didn’t know that there was no contraint, nice.
cheers
Magic
AFAIK the assessment of the current risk is dynamic, the set ALR-rules and areas are fixed.
cheers
Magic
Please make a screenshot of the IVC-server window after the clients joined and you tried UHF/VHF talking.
Additionally, please post a screenshot of your ivc-client window after connecting to the server.
I hope we can spot the issue there, at least it gives us more info.
cheers
Magic
I use AVCS4 as well to good success. I remapped some phrases to sound more natural (added QCC commands) in the multiplayer environment.
cheers
Magic
Still the wrong key to check, at least in your screenshots.
You’ll have to check the “WOW6432Node” path.
cheers
Magic