@CheckPoint Also, i forgot to mention that if you want maximum jamming performance in mode 3, only one program should be active. It was in the changelog for u2 but really a fine print that someone could miss. Did some tests with multiple programs active and the hostile could burnthrough further away as he should so make sure you have the correct program selected. Basically in all campaigns as BLUFOR you use only program 4 and when Ruzzia enters the war, pay attention for mig-31’s and use program 5.
Posts made by Master Yoda
-
RE: F15 firing an AIM120 C at 43 nautical miles on an F16 with its ECM on
-
RE: F15 firing an AIM120 C at 43 nautical miles on an F16 with its ECM on
@Rouge1512 The f-15 is jammed with program 5 not 4. Same with the Mig-31. All other aircraft, program 4
-
RE: Whaaaat?
@SLangner Yeah, dont worry about it, the grading system is borked since sp3 back in 2004.
-
RE: HTS expanded view bug
I concur but i always thought it was intentionally that way.
-
RE: Missing A2A radar bands.
@AviationPlus sadly it doesnt. I need the table from the dash34 before update 2 that had the specific bands for aircraft FCRs. The threat guide doesn’t have them.
-
Missing A2A radar bands.
The dash34 removed the radar/band table and says the info is in the threat guide. That’s true for SAM radars, not for aircraft fcr’s. I know most of them are jammed with program 4 at the h-i bands but some require program 5 and without that reference table, its just guesswork.
-
RE: Except for F-16, is there Other aircrafts that use DataLink ?
@regev In my experience in BMS, most aircraft integrate nicely with the IDM datalink. I tasked an OCA package the other day featuring F-22’s, F–16’s and a single growler. All id’s showed properly.
-
RE: OFMKTO 1.6 for BMS 4.37
@farazparsa I was referring to the real world systems. Vanilla BMS doesn’t have 20’s and 21’s but i think this theater does?
-
RE: OFMKTO 1.6 for BMS 4.37
@MaxWaldorf True. Still, i wanna see a more scientific estimation from a knowledgeable person, ballpark figures are good enough for us civies.
-
RE: OFMKTO 1.6 for BMS 4.37
@Mav-jp Hey mav, i am extremely interested to see your estimations on the S-400. I have a hard time buying how a missile not particularly larger than that of the SA-10 and SA-20 can have those insane advertised ranges. Public info for sa-10 = 50nm, sa-20 = 100nm, sa-21 = 200nm. Thoughts? Sure, electronics got lighter since the 80’s, making the weapon lighter. Sure, rocket fuel might have gotten a bit better (has it?) But 300% increase in max range from sa-10 to sa-21??
-
RE: SA10 vs SDB or JSOW
@suhkoi69 Not in my experience. I’ve only seen SA-10 shooting at HARM’s in ACMI.
-
RE: AI going to low to drop LGB's
@Mav-jp Today they dropped to 10kft without the slightest cloud in sight. Might be worth checking out.
-
AI going to low to drop LGB's
I’ve noticed my wingmen going to 10kft when tasked to attack ground targets in recent interdiction missions and, surprise surprise, they get killed by shorads of all sorts. I dont remember the AI doing that in recent BMS versions. Thoughts? There is limited cloud coverage but nothing that would require that low alts.
-
Ovearhead break landings during wartime?
Pretty much what the title says, is it realistic to use overhead patterns to land your flight during a war if the weather doesn’t require IFR?
-
RE: Mission commander - player rating edit
@MaxWaldorf Nope, if you open a save file with mission commander there is a player rating stat in the teams section. Can you make it editable?
-
Mission commander - player rating edit
Guys, i remember in the days of tacedit that we could edit the player rating stat of our team. Mission commander has it grayed out and i cant touch it. Any ideas? Reason i am asking is because in the last two missions of my current campaign, i got atrocious ratings despite the missions being very successful and i want to revert the change since player rating is one of the most important stats for victory.
-
ALE-50?
First let me thank the entire BMS team for all the hard work and congrats on yet another brilliant release!!
Now to my question, i noticed while reading the -34 in the ECM section that there are references to the ALE-50 towed decoy and some of its function. Is this a placeholder for the future or is the system implemented? -
RE: Roll trimming
@mav-jp I didn’t ask weather it roll trims, i know it doesnt! I also never implied that lockmart should add such a feature!! I merely asked weather its possible in theory for the FLCS to roll stabilize, much like it pitch stabilizes.
-
Roll trimming
Guys, i have what is probably a stupid question for someone that’s been flying falcon 4 since 2000 but here goes…
As we all know, when on asymmetric load-out the jet experiences a rolling moment and we counteract it with trimming. However, why isn’t that something the FLCS does automatically? Since the FLCS applies pitch trimming to balance the jet’s instability (by design), am i under the wrong impression thinking this could also be applied to rolling? I’d appreciate an answer from our gurus here! -
CZ-Double TMS AFT
Has this functionality been added or in the plans to do so?