Update v1.0.5 for Balkans 4.33.1c1
-
This post is deleted! -
white fang, keep it civil
-
All right ppl, let’s put a bit of order in here.
To start with, white fang, you’re on holiday for a 2 weeks. consider yourself very happy because you came pretty close to a perma ban with an insult like the one you let go. Never EVER answer a post in the heat of the moment.
Second, Neystratiou you need to learn to take the criticism better. white fang’s reaction was unpardonable but it probably wouldn’t have happened if you calmed the situation rather than heating up like you did defending against a pseudo attack.
the original argument is valid, you can’t take it as constructive, but it’s valid nevertheless. And i should know since i made all the navigation work before you.
The main point is that you are indeed entitled to work the way you see fit. there is NO ONE that can question that. Again, I do the same.
The guy doing the hardwork can decide the way he wants to work. the other guy just doing nothing stuff it and accept that. if their advices are not taken into consideration then they can start proving that they are able to do their own hardwork. So i’m fully behind you on that argument.But there was no point to push it further than that. That fact is more than enough to gently conclude the argument.
You don’t have to go into lenghty posts heating up the situation like:you are directly offend to my work with "and now, dude, you’ve forgot dozens uhf radio’s "!
to find any duplicates for avoiding conflicts due to BMS code limitation and to finally place them in the list as also in the “stations+ils.dat”
you take offence for constructive criticism, WF was totally right !! there is No need to have 0 set uhf frequency - as me you perfectly know that you will not find uhf for all airports, so basically you will have to compromize, or clearly state that if the airport has no real freq in real life, then there is no uhf in falcon and advise the users to simply use VHF, problem solved.
You very easily judge the work by a guy that spends a lot of time in order to provide perfect and super real data in these nav. stuff and has NO complains for them by years!
and you on the first critic you take off like a rocket defending your honor, comon be a little bit more open minded
What’s wrong with you? You think that your opinion reflects the opinion by all the other members (myself included of course) here that always ask for more and more realism and perfection?
You think that, not WF. If WF opinion doesn’t reflect the rest of the community, why do you defend yourself so vehemently?
And yes, of course and you were offending, very clearly!
Not at all, he was calming the situation, and you failed to see it and accept it. WF is banned because he overreacted and had a few misplaced words, which we moderators won’t let go. But you are as responsible as him because WF clearly tried to calm down the situation and you were too proud to accept it and let it go
Last I always welcome and accept any criticism, WHEN it is correct and based to the real status!
wrong. taking criticism is also accepting that you may be wrong. whit what you state above you can’t take criticism, as proven here above.
Who do you think you are that I must give explanations about my work to?
You have to. That goes with sharing your work. Again, simply tell ppl to use VHF, problem solved without any unnecessary argument. Sharing your work with the community also means you have to tell ppl how to use your work
And I can tell you as i have been in your position doing the exact same thing for way longer than you !It’s not the first time i’m warning you Nikos. we have been here before.
In my views, you’d be both banned. The reason i didn’t ban you is the work you share with the community, but that doesn’t excuse everything.
if you start to be too much work for us moderators, then the outcome will be previsible.and remember, as mod I don’t have to explain myself, again i do it with you on respect of what you’re doing, so see this the right way and don’t start lenghty argument with moderation.
Consider yourself warned as well, next time I’m not discussing anymore, I’m acting as well. -
Back to topic question: I’m very sorry for silly question, everything running fine, thanks for add WeatherMapUpdates folder :D, but how can I see Italian Tornado skin? I still see British and German only.
many thanks.
G -
Back to topic question: I’m very sorry for silly question, everything running fine, thanks for add WeatherMapUpdates folder :D, but how can I see Italian Tornado skin? I still see British and German only.
many thanks.
GWhich Tornados are you flying?
-
Many thanks for your quickly answer, no it was just a curiosity, I’m flying just F16 Just to see the skin of italian tornados.
-
Ah ok. It has to be the Tornado IDS I not the G in order to see the Italian skins. If you are flying in campaign there is a Tornado ADV squadron at Gioia Del Colle but I think they are British
-
Roger. Thanks again for quick answer.
G -
Hi Cougar
Thank you for your time and effort you spend on it
It’s beautiful:woohoo:
thank you once again
Lee -
This post is deleted! -
Hi, after extracting the update to main folder, it is not possible to run the update. Windows 10 tells me that Windows Smartscreen has stopped the app???
Any clou?
Best regards MLU
-
@MLU:
Hi, after extracting the update to main folder, it is not possible to run the update. Windows 10 tells me that Windows Smartscreen has stopped the app???
Any clou?
Best regards MLU
i have also same problem.
I uninstall bms and install fresh
But i have same problemAny idea?
-
I will try this link.
http://winaero.com/blog/how-to-disable-windows-smartscreen-in-windows-10/
Beste regards
MLU -
@MLU:
I will try this link.
http://winaero.com/blog/how-to-disable-windows-smartscreen-in-windows-10/
Beste regards
MLUO yeah, problem solved…
Best regrads
MLU -
Hi guys.
Firstly thanks for updateBut after updated Balkans
falcon bms corrapted and stop workingI need help
Thanks
You might have to do a reinstall of bms. Did you follow the instructions in the readme file?
I uninstall bms and install fresh
But i have same problemAny idea?
-
Did the Balkans theater work prior to the update? If so, re download the update and re install the theater and then try to update after you re download the update.
-
In the patch 1.0.5 there is still messed up station+ils.dat file. For example Pula has no Tower UHF, only Victor. I guess this one from 9th July is correct:
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?27735-Balkans-Stations_ils-dat-file-got-messed-up&p=389033&viewfull=1#post389033Second thing there is a bug in LODs of Mk-82 SE. When you look at aircraft with loaded Snake Eyes under wings from middle distance you can see opened petals but on the nearest LOD they are folded.
-
In the patch 1.0.5 there is still messed up station+ils.dat file. For example Pula has no Tower UHF, only Victor. I guess this one from 9th July is correct:
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?27735-Balkans-Stations_ils-dat-file-got-messed-up&p=389033&viewfull=1#post389033The NavAids in the latest version of 1.0.5 are updated as in real life and current, and are NOT messed up!
Pula airport (LDPL) in real world has no UHF tower frequency, so also in BMS Balkans. A lot of other airports has no UHF tower, that’s why you see them without one.
Nikos. -
Ah, ok. Thanks neystratiou!
-
@Nikos! Pula Tower shouldn’t be on VHF 127.67? Right now it’s on 132.00.