The future of BMS
-
Well no pressure no diamonds is a way different approach and adaptation in BMS.
Money doesn’t make the BMS world go around. It’s something beyond and above it.
If you can’t understand it well I would suggest to read the “earth of humans” or “man and his world” book by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, it’s small to the point and awarded as only few books did.
There are higher values in life than money that are those that stand out and overcome all others. Materialism doesn’t drive this team, it kills it.Στάλθηκε από το MI 5 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
-
You know who I am:
Nope.
Once I’ve gifted you with a DCS Gazelle Module a couple of months ago.
:oops: My gosh!!! …. but it is unfair if you have two pseudos on BMS Forum!?! :hippie: “For me” The one who gifted me the Gazelle is Udet!?! So if you are the same person, how could I know it!?
This video is a joke of course (do this a lot with Radium who is a good friend) … but for sure, I own you apologies. Especially considering the generous gifts you’ve made. But you might also consider the following … we (on BMS) are also offering a sort of gifts (I’ve spent my entire weeks of holidays on dev duties until very late in the night to be ready for a sort of dead line and this is quite often like this scarifying a large part of our personal life) and when we see nacy (known on another famous french forum to be a big troll) spitting on our face every time, you might understand that we can also be offended. It is like someone is invited at your table and then he tells you that your food is shit while smiling. It is even more offending towards my team mates considering the time en efforts they have spent to offer what BMS is. I do not relly care if someone tells me that what I am doing is carp. But I have hard time when thinking about them (one good example is the thread about manuals and docs … I can’t stand reading that they are badly made or pointless considering the time and devotion the doc team spend on it).
While this gift stays unconditional as I stated in my last message to you, I’ve recognized in the last months on this forum that you are not only a nice guy, but a quite arrogant BMS developer as well.
I can understand that. And I am sorry about it.
And because of this arrogance coming out off your nose and ears you are not really willingly to listen to users needs; mainly just defending and spreading your own approaches.
… well … it is my fault for sure of being unable to express myself correctly especially in non native language. It is not a question of what “I” want. I am providing from time to time some small pieces of info about what is to be expected and what is less and try to explain a bit “why” when it is possible. But this is a mistake because each time, ppl who are disappointed not to have dual seat, multi a/c avionics, IFF or L16 … etc … when I say “do not hold your breath” think it is me who don’t want to do it. But I am nobody in the team. I do not decide what must be done or not and what are priorities.
retourne à ta porte ! .
It is “balaye devant ta porte”. … but don’t worry. I got it. One more time … you right. I shouldn’t comes here. I is pointless and a pure lost time. And this is why almost no other dev come here anymore. For a long time now. But I am wrong … they are right. And you are right.
One last advice: Make Falcon BMS a payware .
Already explained why it is not possible and would never brings you anything good. There are a lot of pages about it.
Edit:
@ Kal-EL, please check PM in your “Udet” account. I owe you some more explanations. -
Cyrill (Dee-Jay): referencing to this silly youtube video you’ve disrespected me as a person, theres is a lot of cursing going on in this vid. So what :uham: ?
You know who I am: Once I’ve gifted you with a DCS Gazelle Module a couple of months ago.
While this gift stays unconditional as I stated in my last message to you, I’ve recognized in the last months on this forum that you are not only a nice guy, but a quite arrogant BMS developer as well.
And because of this arrogance coming out off your nose and ears you are not really willingly to listen to users needs; mainly just defending and spreading your own approaches.
Just want to recall a quotation Red Dog made in the DCS Forum a couple of weeks ago during the DCS/FA-18C Hornet bashing, where you’ve been involved too: retourne à ta porte ! .
PS: Don’t worry guys, it is my last post on BMS forum (and likely my last visit too ). I will not criticize your " holy BMS cow " anymore or one or two BMS developer; it’s certainly a waste of time! One last advice: Make Falcon BMS a payware .
Arty is completely right with this picture: Falcon BMS WILL NEVER BECOME a real diamond without needs of serious pressure; maybe an emerald but not a diamond for sure if developing approach is going on the current way and pace.+1
It’s a shame not to listen to the needs of users on Falcon4 BMS, such as rearming.:tape: -
Nacy create a vote and ask how many want it.
Cause a few said so can’t establish a case as granted by the majority.
Also cause we don’t know the priority list of the BMS team , doesn’t mean that some user demand is in higher priority than the dev’s priority.Στάλθηκε από το MI 5 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
-
Nacy create a vote and ask how many want it.
Arty you can make the same request to vote how many do not want it rearmed.
-
Cause a few said so can’t establish a case as granted by the majority.
The majority of dev’s?
-
Also cause we don’t know the priority list of the BMS team , doesn’t mean that some user demand is in higher priority than the dev’s priority.
The priority list of the BMS team, to rearm: it will not happen. https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?31670-Rearming-at-ongoing-missions&highlight=REARM
The demand of some users to rearm: it will not happen. https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?31670-Rearming-at-ongoing-missions&highlight=REARM
The priority of the developer to rearm an F16: it will not happen. https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?31670-Rearming-at-ongoing-missions&highlight=REARMAs said before Kal-El, and he is right.
And because of this arrogance coming out off your nose and ears you are not really willingly to listen to users needs; mainly just defending and spreading your own approaches. -
If the devs stopped today I would still have a wonderful sim to fly for years to come. Everything new we get is just bonus material IMO…but, they haven’t stopped and are working on a release of 4.34 in 3-4 weeks, so lets just see what they have in store for us, shall we?
I agree whole heartedly.
-
… well … it is my fault for sure of being unable to express myself correctly especially in non native language. It is not a question of what “I” want. I am providing from time to time some small pieces of info about what is to be expected and what is less and try to explain a bit “why” when it is possible. But this is a mistake because each time, ppl who are disappointed not to have dual seat, multi a/c avionics, IFF or L16 … etc … when I say “do not hold your breath” think it is me who don’t want to do it. But I am nobody in the team. I do not decide what must be done or not and what are priorities.
When you say “it will not happen” here: https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?31670-Rearming-at-ongoing-missions&highlight=REARM
You are part of the team, you decide what should be done or not, and you take priorities? -
I’m sure it will be unfortunately, I will have been dead for 3-4 weeks.
I think that you should try and hang on for a few weeks longer because 3-4 weeks after the launch of BMS 5.0, BMS 6.0 will be released and it will be awesomer. Hang in there, we are only talking about 7-8 weeks.
-
No nacy the majority of the community.
And if you want it that bad… Proove that u are capable and take the path to join the BMS dev team so to fulfill your quest.Στάλθηκε από το MI 5 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
-
-
Hi Nacy.
You are part of the team, you decide what should be done or not, and you take priorities?
Yep. You are right, I am part of them. And if I had to vote, I would be against it (for several reasons). But it is not because I am against than other members think the same and especially on coder side! I am against the pink HUD, we have discussed about it, I gave my vote … => pink, orange, red, black HUD are still there. Period. If the majority of other of BMS member think it is valuable, my voice is only one voice among others. When I say “it won"t happens” … what you have to understand is : As far as I know, nobody on dev side seems want to have it, or to make it , if only it would be possible without breaking something critical. And to tell you everything, the only time I touched on the subject, absolutely no one answered! So …
And since devs are developing for free, we won’t implement something we don’t want to just because you have blue eyes Nacy. (Especially considering the way you are spiting on our face as soon as you can with your sarcastic tone.)I am surprised that you don’t understand that!(?) You makes me think about TagNight. Really.
Whatever … sun is shining, weather is good … lets enjoy a bit of the summer.
Regards.
-
If the devs are going to port BMS to Dx11+ Please! leave the option for using dx9 or some configs for the crappy pc’s, Not all of us have the money to get a good pc…
-
If the devs are going to port BMS to Dx11+ Please! leave the option for using dx9 or some configs for the crappy pc’s, Not all of us have the money to get a good pc…
I would agree. Many DX limitations for different versions. DX 9.0c for those who have lower end GFX cards. DX 11.2 for those with higher end cards. I would forget about DX 12+ for now. Doing so would limit the sim to Windows 10 and above. I have no intention of moving up to 10 in the foreseeable future as I love old sims and games that just won’t run on 10.
-
Hi Nacy.
Yep. You are right, I am part of them. And if I had to vote, I would be against it (for several reasons). But it is not because I am against than other members think the same and especially on coder side! I am against the pink HUD, we have discussed about it, I gave my vote … => pink, orange, red, black HUD are still there. Period. If the majority of other of BMS member think it is valuable, my voice is only one voice among others. When I say “it won"t happens” … what you have to understand is : As far as I know, nobody on dev side seems want to have it, or to make it , if only it would be possible without breaking something critical. And to tell you everything, the only time I touched on the subject, absolutely no one answered! So …
And since devs are developing for free, we won’t implement something we don’t want to just because you have blue eyes Nacy. (Especially considering the way you are spiting on our face as soon as you can with your sarcastic tone.)I am surprised that you don’t understand that!(?) You makes me think about TagNight. Really.
Whatever … sun is shining, weather is good … lets enjoy a bit of the summer.
Regards.
Just to add…
Hot pits are done in areas away from other aircraft generally. Along with fire and safety equipment present during the hot pit. Hot pit (on average) takes about 30min. Hot rearm is done to an even more cautious manner. Fire and safety equipment is a must during a hot rearm. Also, only certain weapons cab be hot rearmed. Say, 2 slammers, 4 bombs (LGB) would take about an hour for a hot rearm. So time wise, why not just exit the jet and get into another one. This talk about a hot rearm being 5 min. or what not is ridiculous.
-
Besides
Rearming in 3D means you will take off with the same flight plan since you can not reload a new DTC
I don’t understand the purpose since hotrram would take more than an hour . Better to come back 2D and create on the fly a new mission with correct Comao , DTC and loadoute
Maybe the users that which this feature coula explain better why they prefer spending 1H on ground in 3D rather than creating a new flight
You should really make use of the fantastic opportunity that offers BMS to create onthefly comao while campaign running IMO
-
(Especially considering the way you are spiting on our face as soon as you can with your sarcastic tone.)
As said above, I will wait for the new generation. Dee-Jay if you can stop spitting it gives a bad impression of yourself.:)
-
Gentlemen, let’s call it quits. From what I heard the future is bright and let’s leave it like that :idea: these future of bms threads… I prefer the present
-
As said above, I will wait for the new generation. Dee-Jay if you can stop spitting it gives a bad impression of yourself.:)
I feel a ban coming….
…and a thread lock.