Ff you could have one thing in the next update it would be…
-
I wish AI vehicles could just follow alternative routes if a bridge is destroyed and Eng. Battalions could repair them in few hours.
Everytime I started a campaign I had to block all strikes on brigdes because they literally brake the campaign from the start.
This is the only major flaw I found in the campaigns.Maybe is even possible to create this unit:
It was a few years ago that I flew a SP campaign with 4.33, but I do remember finishing campaigns without touching anything related to bridges.
Also, I don’t know for sure but this rings a bell as something that was fixed already (But this isn’t really my area so I have no idea if indeed it was).
Are you SURE that this behavior still exists with 4.33 ? -
This post is deleted! -
It was a few years ago that I flew a SP campaign with 4.33, but I do remember finishing campaigns without touching anything related to bridges.
Also, I don’t know for sure but this rings a bell as something that was fixed already (But this isn’t really my area so I have no idea if indeed it was).
Are you SURE that this behavior still exists with 4.33 ?I’ve played all campaigns months ago with the last 4.33 update Korea Thearter only , I’m 100% sure of that.
-
I’ve played all campaigns months ago with the last 4.33 update Korea Thearter only , I’m 100% sure of that.
What if you manually task an engineer battalion to go there ?
Don’t forget to desactivate bataillions auto control -
What if you manually task an engineer battalion to go there ?
Don’t forget to desactivate bataillions auto controlI’m pretty sure I’ve moved them near a destroyed bridge… no joy after 2 days.
Few months have passed since my last try … I guess I’ll wait 4.34 for another test -
This post is deleted! -
I’m pretty sure I’ve moved them near a destroyed bridge… no joy after 2 days.
Few months have passed since my last try … I guess I’ll wait 4.34 for another testyou need to activate player control else the campaign engine will retask it somewhere else a few minutes later
-
Speaking of the campaign:
I would really like the option to disable the effect of the “mission rating” on the 2D engagement outcomes.
I find it quite “gamey”… Why would the performance of a single plane impact the combat capability of the whole army?
But most importantly, it annoys my perfectionist side, often pushing me to reload if I didn’t get an high enough rating, as I worry that I’m crippling my side.I’m not saying to remove it in the name of realism, as maybe others like it, it’s just that I would like the choice.
Cheers!
-
Speaking of the campaign:
I would really like the option to disable the effect of the “mission rating” on the 2D engagement outcomes.
I find it quite “gamey”… Why would the performance of a single plane impact the combat capability of the whole army?
But most importantly, it annoys my perfectionist side, often pushing me to reload if I didn’t get an high enough rating, as I worry that I’m crippling my side.I’m not saying to remove it in the name of realism, as maybe others like it, it’s just that I would like the choice.
Cheers!
Without this you would play the same campaign over and over. In fact to me is one of the biggest problem that you literally cannot loose a campaign…
-
Without this you would play the same campaign over and over. […]
Well, why would the campaign always be the same? There is some randomness in all AI choices and combat outcomes, different force ratios to choose, one could manage differently the ground forces, or give different priorities and tasks to the air forces… I think there is plenty of variability, even if we don’t take into account the player’s mission outcomes.
Incidentally, maybe you never lose a campaign because you often get high mission ratings?
In any case, one could design a difficult campaign that is hard to win even with perfect scores and mission tasking. Maybe it would be even more easy to balance, if one didn’t have to care about mission scores influencing the outcome. -
Do you read reddit.? Is this valid or what.? if things are discussed there are valid our wishes are coming true maybe?
-
What thing?
Στάλθηκε από το MI 5 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
-
I am impressed you don’t know reddit?you know everything:p www.reddit.com
-
I know it , but there are many things there and much missinformation.
So which post from reddit are you referring to and asking if its true?Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T818A using Tapatalk
-
If dcs got a campaign bla bla bla .is the thread
-
I don’t see anything. Share a link please
Στάλθηκε από το MI 5 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
-
There are tons of topics like that in /r/Hoggit going back a looong time. Link required for proper discussion please
-
I got it via pm.
I don;t see anything interesting there, just a light DCS-BMS comparisons, thankfully some BMS forum members had straighten the guys out cause many inaccuracies and speculations where posted…
Our known DCS thread but in a light version. -
Right what ever you say. Did you read the whole thread.? Did you only notice what they compare? You make me mad,! Forget it
-
There are tons of topics like that in /r/Hoggit going back a looong time. Link required for proper discussion please
I dont know if I can post it here