Sukhoi Su-34
-
IF we have do (maybe someday?) push some limits further away, it is smarter to do it first on “non primary” aircraft. So all the experience gained will be more benefit for “primary” stuff. So to me, it makes perfect sens.
From this POV I understand the function of this plane.
-
Oh … there is no “function” to the plane except that it particularly pleases Jp and Radium.
I just personally think it is indeed better to work from the “lowest” to the “highest” (on that particular cases).
-
-
From this POV I understand the function of this plane.
Well, I’d like people to listen exactly what I said. If not, I have no reason to write here anymore.
1. Our current model of F-16 is almost 15 years old.
2. Even it is a really beautiful model (for me the most accurate on BMS and in all simulation, even DCS), it barely matches what is acceptable now, in term of technology.
3. There is a working doctrine in Industry which is called “continuous improvement”.
4. If we don’t follow it, you will always have outdated resources and processes.
5. Then, people will always claim that our database is old looking.
6. I think that many people do not mind having Flight Simulator 98 generation models in their campaigns or DB. I feel ashamed to consider that this is something normal, and take it as my own responsibility to change it. Even this is not a competition, I don’t want to blush when I see what DCS can graphically provide. Despite having an highly limited combat interest, DCS is thousand of lightyears forward in term of graphical realism for tactical objects (aircraft, ships and vehicles).
7. So, my idea is this one : never feel happy with what we have, and look forward to see what’s next, to continuously improve our favorite software. My standard is what’s next. Not about a glorious past. Some like history, I like future.
10. If you have another way to think, i’m fine with it. But here is my way of deploying my passion into BMS. Some will complain, some will be happy, I just don’t mind, because I feel I’m doing it right. And I will keep telling you that I’m going in the path that I feel to be the right one. If dev team wants to fire me because of this; I’m fine with it. They just have to ask me for it, I will leave without any question. But I will never trade my convictions.
11. Last but not least : this is my very own point of view. I don’t intend that I’m the best one, I’m just an humble and simple 3D modeler with one ideal : to have the best DB for my favorite software I never play with, to enjoy creating.
Regards and peacefully yours,
Radium
-
Well, I’d like people to listen exactly what I said. If not, I have no reason to write here anymore.
1. Our current model of F-16 is almost 15 years old.
2. Even its a really beautiful model (for me the most accurate on BMS and in all simulation, even DCS), it barely matches what is acceptable now, in term of technology.
3. There is a working doctrine in Industry which is called “continuous improvement”.
4. If we don’t follow it, you will always have outdated resources and processes.
5. Then, people will always claim that our database is old looking.
6. I think that many people do not mind having Flight Simulator 98 generation models in their campaigns or DB. I feel ashamed to consider that this is something normal, and take it as my own responsibility to change it. Even this is not a competition, I don’t want to blush when I see what DCS can graphically provide. Despite having an highly limited combat interest, DCS is thousand of lightyears forward in term of graphical realism for tactical objects (aircraft, ships and vehicles).
7. So, my idea is this one : never feel happy with what we have, and look forward to see what’s next, to continuously improve our favorite software. My standard is what’s next. Not about a glorious past. Some like history, I like future.
10. If you have another way to think, i’m fine with it. But here is my way of deploying my passion into BMS. Some will complain, some will be happy, I just don’t mind, because I feel I’m doing it right. And I will keep telling you that I’m going in the path that I feel to be the right one. If dev team wants to fire me because of this; I’m fine with it. They just have to ask me for it, I will leave without any question. But I will never trade my convictions.
11. Last but not least : this is my very own point of view. I don’t intend that I’m the best one, I’m just an humble and simple 3D modeler with one ideal : to have the best DB for my favorite software I never play with, to enjoy creating.
Regards and peacefully yours,
Radium
Mannnn keep working and ignore the bad vibes, your work is amazing!!!
-
I totally agree with you.
There needs some improvement and not just because the DCS . The BMS is worth it to be nicer than now. But to be a success and faster way there need more help to the community to help make or upgrade for the old DB. I bet some of them can make 3d models but they don’t have the necessary information about the whole process and criteria.But It is not good if everyone shoots with questions to you and the devs every minutes in PM or in topic.
There should be an unitilized know-how manual that they reach anytime without disturbing anyone else.
yes I know the start takes time to create one, but after that ,it can be accelerated the process.PS.: I read your comment carefully and I can see you missed the 8 and 9 articles
-
I totally agree with you.
There needs some improvement and not just because the DCS . The BMS is worth it to be nicer than now. But to be a success and faster way there need more help to the community to help make or upgrade for the old DB. I bet some of them can make 3d models but they don’t have the necessary information about the whole process and criteria.But It is not good if everyone shoots with questions to you and the devs every minutes in PM or in topic.
There should be an unitilized know-how manual that they reach anytime without disturbing anyone else.
yes I know the start takes time to create one, but after that ,it can be accelerated the process.PS.: I read your comment carefully and I can see you missed the 8 and 9 articles
In fact, they existed. I just found they weren’t helping my statements. I forget to re-adjust list numbers !
Thank you for your comment !
-
An impressive aircraft IRL needs definitely an impressive model in our wonderful simulator! Keep up the good work Radium!!!
-
nice to see this bird finally have his glory in this simulator. ****ars that don’t understand better shut up.
-
nice to see this bird finally have his glory in this simulator. ****ars that don’t understand better shut up.
Sukhoi Su-34 is probably the only fighter aircraft in the world you can drain airborne….
-
hahaha, those ultra secret bio bombs they were gossiping about!
-
I wonder if Su-34 aviators are allowed to call ‘bombs away’ after solid dump in this facility. That could be a bit confusing …
-
the toilet picture is a fake
been debated to hell on modelling forum. there’s no toilet in the Su34
-
@Red:
the toilet picture is a fake
been debated to hell on modelkling forum. there’s no toilet in the Su34
Oh ok. I wonder why it is widespread on the internet…
Thank you for the information !
-
On the pros side, at least it simplifies 3dpit modelling
-
@Red:
the toilet picture is a fake
Yes, that picture is fake.
@Red:
there’s no toilet in the Su34
AFAIK there is a solution… Not a “room” toilet with the wider meaning but only the necessary “hardware” behind one of the two crew seats.
https://thaimilitaryandasianregion.wordpress.com/2015/11/13/su-34-fullback/
-
It was aboiut time to get a leap forward in 3d models for this sim! There’s tons of models that either uses another airplane/unit model or they are non-existent or they are way back from Falcon 4.0. Im with Radium in that 100% not becuase i do 3d models my self but because BMS community deserves it and now that most of people have descent machines in their homes to play DCS for example i dont see why not having better and quality 3d stuff in our Beloved sim! Also no we have all the room theoritically to do so from the point that we dont have anymore the 2gb limit of the db right? so lets get advantage of it and push forward! For me theres a lot of models that need to be updated even if they seem quite ok (for 8k tris model) but lets face it we are in 2020 not in 1998…
Cheers!
-
Yes, that picture is fake.
AFAIK there is a solution… Not a “room” toilet with the wider meaning but only the necessary “hardware” behind one of the two crew seats.
https://thaimilitaryandasianregion.wordpress.com/2015/11/13/su-34-fullback/
At the time I daily flew fighter aircraft, this was my best friend… In case of…
I always had one in my anti-g suit !
-
AFAIK there is a solution… Not a “room” toilet with the wider meaning but only the necessary “hardware” behind one of the two crew seats.
fair enough
but then the F-16 has got one too - actualy two and even a space to store them when filled, right under the seat
you just can’t stand while doing it -
It was one of the toilets of MIR space station.