Just to be sure
-
@amraam said in Just to be sure:
Based on the informations I have, Mica should have a lower MAR than the AIM-120B anyway.
And the strength of mica is mica IR which is not properly simulated for now
-
Don’t speak about MAR, NEZ, RMAX1 etc…
I just want to know why there is a difference flying Rafale /MICA EM between 4.35 U2 and 4.35 U3, because where is a difference.
With U3, it’s very hard to kill A/C. We don’t have change our tactics or Roe’s.
This discution seems to take the same way with my first post about the rafale flight model. I’m desapointed. -
@wacco said in Just to be sure:
Don’t speak about MAR, NEZ, RMAX1 etc…
I just want to know why there is a difference flying Rafale /MICA EM between 4.35 U2 and 4.35 U3, because where is a difference.
With U3, it’s very hard to kill A/C. We don’t have change our tactics or Roe’s.
This discution seems to take the same way with my first post about the rafale flight model. I’m desapointed.Lol that’s just because We fixed a bug in AI that were not properly executing defensive action
It’s a bug that was as old as falcon 4.0 it’s totally unrelated with missile capability
-
@mav-jp said in Just to be sure:
@wacco said in Just to be sure:
Don’t speak about MAR, NEZ, RMAX1 etc…
I just want to know why there is a difference flying Rafale /MICA EM between 4.35 U2 and 4.35 U3, because where is a difference.
With U3, it’s very hard to kill A/C. We don’t have change our tactics or Roe’s.
This discution seems to take the same way with my first post about the rafale flight model. I’m desapointed.Lol that’s just because We fixed a bug in AI that were not properly executing defensive action
It’s a bug that was as old as falcon 4.0 it’s totally unrelated with missile capability
As far as rafale flight model it has been unchanged those last 10years
-
@wacco said in Just to be sure:
With U3, it’s very hard to kill A/C. We don’t have change our tactics or Roe’s.
Hi. This “issue” is not related to Rafale, the situation is the same with F-16 too. The AI has become smarter and harder to kill in U3.
-
Ok, so my apologies for this misunderstanding.
We have to reconsider our A/A tactics.
AMRAAM is more powerfull than MICA and AA12 are, which explains my impression of degradation of Rafale / MICA. -
@wacco said in Just to be sure:
Ok, so my apologies for this misunderstanding.
We have to reconsider our A/A tactics.
AMRAAM is more powerfull than MICA and AA12 are, which explains my impression of degradation of Rafale / MICA.To be check but I think MICa is more or less like AA12….
The good news is that I started working on MICA IR
-
@mav-jp said in Just to be sure:
@wacco said in Just to be sure:
Ok, so my apologies for this misunderstanding.
We have to reconsider our A/A tactics.
AMRAAM is more powerfull than MICA and AA12 are, which explains my impression of degradation of Rafale / MICA.To be check but I think MICa is more or less like AA12….
The good news is that I started working on MICA IR
That’s great Mav, that would be a great help against new IA, and waiting METEOR
-
@amraam funniest post I ever read for days… How bold can you be to affirm such statement ? Please be humble man…
-
@radium I just said “based on the information I have”. No statement behind it.
You should know me a bit more than that ;). -
@radium said in Just to be sure:
@amraam funniest post I ever read for days… How bold can you be to affirm such statement ? Please be humble man…
Amraam said a lower MAR not a lower range nor a lower Epole Fpole or any other tralalapole.
-
@amraam said in Just to be sure:
@radium I just said “based on the information I have”. No statement behind it.
You should know me a bit more than that ;).I’m pretty sure that “according to information you have”, MICA-EM is not even matching AIM-120A nor even AIM-7… , and MICA-IR may not even match AIM-9M according the same information…
And I do agree with Radium, your statement about non US weapons or planes (in most of the case) really challenge your knowledge about them.
-
@topolo said in Just to be sure:
@amraam said in Just to be sure:
@radium I just said “based on the information I have”. No statement behind it.
You should know me a bit more than that ;).I’m pretty sure that “according to information you have”, MICA-EM is not even matching AIM-120A nor even AIM-7… , and MICA-IR may not even match AIM-9M according the same information…
And I do agree with Radium, your statement about non US weapons or planes (in most of the case) really challenge your knowledge about them.
According to my information mica EM are dummy missiles made of wood and rafale second engine is just for decoration
-
@mav-jp Let’s get some pop-corn… I see a troll
-