BMS 4.36 DEV SERIES - AGM 65L
-
It definitely works
- assume self laze?
- have you set up the laser?
- laser arm switch?
- trigger to fire laser?
- clear line of sight?
- used in limits?
- target in keyhole?
- missile ready?
-
@Migbuster Yes it worked indeed. Thanks a lot
-
Great work to get the laser variant in the game!
Had also the problem that I could not hit something. In my case I could solve it by immediately doing a manual (first trigger detent) lasing (the 40s programmed via DED for some reason where not enough) and keeping it all the time. Watching at the trajectory of the missile, you can see that it drops the nose down quite fast after launch. If the laser is not applied quickly it cannot recover with a proper path to the target.
… just wanted to explain a bit, in case someone had the same problem.
Keep up the good work dev-team! -
@Mav-jp - are the SCAN, SLAVE, and CAGE functions also modeled? Couldn’t really tell from the video…unless there is some symbology missing.
-
is the lasing on this automatic or does it have to be done manually?
-
@Alfred manually
-
Ahh, finally the manual lasing trigger became significant. Thank you Max.
-
@Stevie said in BMS 4.36 DEV SERIES - AGM 65L:
@Mav-jp - are the SCAN, SLAVE, and CAGE functions also modeled? Couldn’t really tell from the video…unless there is some symbology missing.
Not modelled
-
@Tumbler31 - thought so…great to have LMAV, still room for improvement.
-
I noticed that the pull gets very limited once the laser is fired
-
@Alfred - the MAVL does have a reduced field of regard over the MAVE, but it shouldn’t really be that noticeable.
Your ability to hold a track should be as good as the TGP ability to track and lase during a pull, it’s just that now you are going to get some positive feedback on how you’re doing.
And the laser modes should be in accord with the baseline TGP track mode(s). Trigger lase should be an option, not a requirement.
-
@Alfred you mean your control of the aircraft changes when the laser is firing?
-
@SOBO-87 said in BMS 4.36 DEV SERIES - AGM 65L:
@Alfred you mean your control of the aircraft changes when the laser is firing?
yes, and significantly. The pull up becomes hard to do & rate of ascend therefore very low.
-
@Alfred
Do you by any chance use the FSSB from Real Simulator and forgot to remove the key binding for the precision mode? This was by default mapped to the trigger button (at least for me). -
@Razor161 said in BMS 4.36 DEV SERIES - AGM 65L:
@Alfred
Do you by any chance use the FSSB from Real Simulator and forgot to remove the key binding for the precision mode? This was by default mapped to the trigger button (at least for me).yes I have the FSSB from real simulator. What exactly is the key binding for precision mode?
-
@Alfred said in BMS 4.36 DEV SERIES - AGM 65L:
@Razor161 said in BMS 4.36 DEV SERIES - AGM 65L:
@Alfred
Do you by any chance use the FSSB from Real Simulator and forgot to remove the key binding for the precision mode? This was by default mapped to the trigger button (at least for me).yes I have the FSSB from real simulator. What exactly is the key binding for precision mode?
By default it is the 1st trigger detend. The same thing that is used to fire the laser.
You can disable it in the Software the comes with the FSSB. -
@Razor161 said in BMS 4.36 DEV SERIES - AGM 65L:
@Alfred said in BMS 4.36 DEV SERIES - AGM 65L:
@Razor161 said in BMS 4.36 DEV SERIES - AGM 65L:
@Alfred
Do you by any chance use the FSSB from Real Simulator and forgot to remove the key binding for the precision mode? This was by default mapped to the trigger button (at least for me).yes I have the FSSB from real simulator. What exactly is the key binding for precision mode?
By default it is the 1st trigger detend. The same thing that is used to fire the laser.
You can disable it in the Software the comes with the FSSB.thanks pal, you were right, I disabled it and the stick’s response during lasing is normal.
-
@Alfred - that certainly ain’t right…
-
@Stevie let’s continue here
Yes, AGM-65L is not complete and has some issues (kinda wondered why no one started about the DLZ ). But so far I found limited public info on this version.
If you can share some info or give public references, that would be of great help.
-
@Tumbler31 - if you start with the MAVE, you will be VERY close. The only thing I know that differs is that the MAVL FOR is slightly smaller, but I don’t know by how much.
In fact, I’d like to see both E and L variants included in BMS - I think the two also differ in warheads, but not certain about that.