ITO 1.07.0v Bugs
-
@unkindled said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
First flight in ITO 1.07.2 and 4.37.2 and got instant CTD when requesting taxi back to ramp in ITO80s.
Crash dumps : https://drive.google.com/file/d/13FIB3c-CgTQciotTMNVSDJa5QbC59B_q/view?usp=sharing
Hope you got it right,
Probably error with the Updater, try installing the full installation.@javo said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
I am getting the callsigns and bearing formated as dates instead of the actual values.
Noticed that as well, Investigating
Thanks for the report -
@Apolo27 what do I have to look at that lines? I dont understand, did not touch that file previously.
-
@javo If you haven’t touched those lines, it means that everyone has the same problem, don’t worry, the developer of the theater is aware and knows how to fix that bug.
The solution to this bug is in the file and in the lines of code that I mentioned before, but if you are not sure about doing it, I recommend that you wait for the fix. Greetings
-
This post is deleted! -
SU-22/17 glitch
Guys, the afterburner on Su-22/17 seems to be “invisible” (the AB is ON but there is no visual on the burner).
Same thing with Landing gear and Flaps
-
@VDK said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
SU-22/17 glitch
Guys, the afterburner on Su-22/17 seems to be “invisible” (the AB is ON but there is no visual on the burner).
Same thing with Landing gear and Flaps
will check asap
-
@vAiCon said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
will check asap
Some other things…
Fly the Su-22 and let the aircraft go faster… You will notice also that the airbrake opens (but with no effect on speed), also the wings do not sweep back.Apply rudder and you will see that the left slat opens
The LOD model for Su-17/22 are GORGEOUS, but this details are a little hard to deal with
Anyway, thanks!
-
Missing Aircraft ITO 1980s mission editor (add squadron/add flight):
F-16C Blk 32 EAF (Aggressors)
MiG 19
MiG 23ML
-
@Bloodhound161 Thanks for reporting that, fixed in the next release
@unkindled Did it happen again and were you able to reproduce the CTD upon requesting taxi back to ramp in 80s?
-
@RUSHER0600 I haven’t managed to fly ITO80s lately as I’ve been mostly flying in UOAF, so I can’t help unfortunately.
-
@unkindled Gotcha, no problem. I guess it’s the same old bug that happens sometimes in the ATC brain, unfortunately hard to repro.
-
Just to add, I also got wind speeds displayed like this today, aswell as aircraft callsigns (For instance NICKEL11 would be NICKEL 01-Jan
-
The A-6E has no access to the inbuilt TGP, and no external one can be mounted, therefore no laser based weapons can be guided.
Chaff / flare are also loaded and can be used by AI but not by a human. This affects some other aircraft too.
-
Just to add, I also got wind speeds displayed like this today, aswell as aircraft callsigns (For instance NICKEL11 would be NICKEL 01-Jan
Sounds more like a code than theater issue to me, might be worth reproducing it in KTO and then reporting it using the official bugtracker
The A-6E has no access to the inbuilt TGP, and no external one can be mounted, therefore no laser based weapons can be guided.
I guess that should be an easy fix, are you referring to ITO or 80s though?
Chaff / flare are also loaded and can be used by AI but not by a human. This affects some other aircraft too.
Odd, you mean the CMs are loaded as per the CMDS indicators but CMS-Up / Slapswitch don’t trigger any CM release? Which aircraft are affected?
-
@SammySkycrafts said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
Just to add, I also got wind speeds displayed like this today, aswell as aircraft callsigns (For instance NICKEL11 would be NICKEL 01-Jan
what is your version of ITO ?
i have fixed this issue already and couldn’t replicate it from the hotfix update. -
@vAiCon I used the full installer a couple of days ago, so v1.07.2
-
@RUSHER0600 For 2, it was ITO, not 80’s, though I suspect it may also affect there as I believe the default BMS dat for the A-6E includes no TGP.
Yes, the CMs were loaded as per the indicator, AI was able to use them but human-controlled aircraft cannot, I verified all cmds settings were correct which they were. I have seen this issue a few times in KTO too, it needed a change in the aircraft.dat iirc
-
@SammySkycrafts said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
@vAiCon I used the full installer a couple of days ago, so v1.07.2
check your theater page and check if you see 1.07.2 + hotfix,
if not… then install it … -
@vAiCon Sorry for the late reply…
Doing that fixed it, I assumed this was included with the main download however it appears it wasnt. Thanks for the help!
-
There appears to be an issue with ITO and Mission Commander. If you load up a standard ITO campaign or TE, the database MC uses is for ITO80’s, so makes the file unusable in BMS. I have discovered the cause of this is because MC reads from the theater.lst file. That has ITO80’s at the top, and presumably, MC selects the theater based on the first part of the path. Which for both ITO and ITO80’s is Add-On Israel. Would splitting the theatre be feasible? Or would this be better to be bought up with @Falcas on the MC thread?
https://forum.falcon-bms.com/topic/25437/mc-te-ito-database/