Solved what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?
-
@dumba said in what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?:
@john1974 Well, I can’t be arsed with a screenshot, you’ll have to take my word for it. Getting cca 147-150 FPS, first day first mission sitting on the ramp, dark jet. Max settings ingame.
Specs in signature.
nice!
-
@john1974 Also, according to the game, I am GPU bound; CPU frames are in the 180-low 200s range.
-
@dumba said in what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?:
@john1974 Also, according to the game, I am GPU bound; CPU frames are in the 180-low 200s range.
yeah, you have a high-end cpu, so that explains, still you have a good setup.
-
@john1974 planning to replace the graphics card, but way more modestly than yourself…
-
@john1974
So you want to know numbers but not bothered to know the settings around those numbers or how those numbers were achieved? Then what good are those numbers? How would any of it help you or anyone?I could tell you I have 200 fps… no wait… it’s actually 40 fps.
Both numbers could be totally legit, one is clear sky starting off from Kadena AFB with no other flights within 60nm and the other is solid cloud layer in Gunsan sitting behind 6 packages on a taxiway while 4 other packages are forming up overhead and I’m here fiddling with my TGP/Mav boresighting. So what’s the point of the exercise of asking about FPS numbers?Let me give you another example = on one test, I went from 95fps to 269fps to 88fps.
Here’s a little snippet for you
Can you appreciate those numbers without me telling you how those numbers were achieved?
-
@Atlas nice FPS
-
@john1974 said in what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?:
@Atlas nice FPS
And what info does those FPS number give you?
-
With my system specs in my sig, I never go below 90 in 2k. Most of the time it’s above 120. I rarely turn on the counter because my frames are super smooth with no problems…
-
@john1974 said in what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?:
@Icer said in what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?:
@john1974 said in what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?:
Thanks for the input everyone! Appreciate it.
New MSI Z790 MB is on the way and a new CPU as well, I9-14900K, and new DDR5’s on the way as well.
Thanks guys/gals!And a nice 1000w Gold PSU, yes?
1200 buddy, Corsair RM1200x
You folks still DID NOT answer my question though,
what’s everyone’s FPS on campaign on their rig?
Want to see some screenshots along with their FPS please.
There is really only one way to compare FPS. Same resolution, same BMS graphics settings, same NVidia 3D settings, same mission (Benchmark TE only) at the same spot at the same time… Usually that is sitting on the runway ready for TO… As @Atlas showed above, I can take a pic with 350FPS, can take one with 90, depends when and where I am, in what mission, etc.
-
Just to give you guys/gals an update. I’m now able to run 120+ fps on the new rig.
Technically it is now able to run at 200+ FPS but I just enabled the frame limit to 120 FPS on RivaTuner
My New Rig specs are as follows:
Intel i9-14900K (I Undervolted to an offset of 0.1v, PL1=125w and PL2=253w, 307A limit) for reliability and stability
MSI MAG Z790 Tomahawk Max WIFI DDR5 with the latest BIOS update
Corsair Vengeance 32 GB DDR5 7200 RAM
Arctic cooler Liquid Freezer 360 III w/ upgraded P12 MAX fans
Cruicial 2 TB M.2 NVME
450 GB SATA 3 SSD
Corsair RM1200x PSU
ASUS RTX 4080 OC Edition (Undervolted to 0.940v at 2805 MHZ clock)
Lian Li Lancool 216 Black version
Windows 10 ProOverall, it runs pretty good and stable. Getting a Cinebench R23 score of 41K when on Extreme tuned @ 300W, but at the current default tune, it runs pretty cool and stable temps at 76c with an average score of 34k. For reliability and longevity it’s Pretty good so far.
Happy Flying!
-
@john1974
I’m not sure why you’re insisting on doing it this way.
Unfortunately, those numbers mean absolutely nothing to anyone else.
It’s like all of us are running our cars on a quarter mile and comparing times and speeds and then you come in with your times and speeds but not realising the fact that we’ve all done ours on the quarter mile and you’ve done yours over 3 miles while going downhill. With a rolling start.It’s apples to oranges while everyone else is doing their best to keep it apples to apples.
Clear skies, Angels 22, nothing on the MFDs, only one flight 40nm away, and you’re only getting 120/155/122fps? On a 4080?
Take off that limiter, run the Benchmark TE and let us know what your framerates are in the cold-and-dark jet and also on a hot jet sitting on the runway.
Let us know your resolution, nVidia settings, game settings, etc.
Then those numbers will be easier to compare with what others have reported.All that being said, congrats on the sweet new rig!
That’s a cool case you’ve picked out as well! -
@Atlas said in what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?:
@john1974
I’m not sure why you’re insisting on doing it this way.
Unfortunately, those numbers mean absolutely nothing to anyone else.
It’s like all of us are running our cars on a quarter mile and comparing times and speeds and then you come in with your times and speeds but not realising the fact that we’ve all done ours on the quarter mile and you’ve done yours over 3 miles while going downhill. With a rolling start.It’s apples to oranges while everyone else is doing their best to keep it apples to apples.
Clear skies, Angels 22, nothing on the MFDs, only one flight 40nm away, and you’re only getting 120/155/122fps? On a 4080?
Take off that limiter, run the Benchmark TE and let us know what your framerates are in the cold-and-dark jet and also on a hot jet sitting on the runway.
Let us know your resolution, nVidia settings, game settings, etc.
Then those numbers will be easier to compare with what others have reported.All that being said, congrats on the sweet new rig!
That’s a cool case you’ve picked out as well!Insisting on what?? What are you even trying to say dude.
I’m not trying to make FPS comparisons dude, I asked for FPS question previously because of budget constraints and trying to gauge my old PC’s performance before pulling the trigger. It was a FRIENDLY question, asking only for an FPS with screenshot, but ended up being bashed or replied to with sarcasm from you. At least the others were willing to give advice which i’m thankful for.
As for the 120FPS I wanna keep that way, if I keep at 120 or 300FPS so what? I’m sure it doesn’t matter since you said it yourself, it won’t mean to anyone anyways. BMS runs smooth now for me either way so I like it that way, than previously when it was 50FPS from my old rig.
I’m getting 290FPS but wanna keep it at 120FPS just so It lowers my GPU wattage and CPU wattage as well and keep the rig’s reliability and longevity. Is that a problem?
-
@john1974
So… you are asking “what’s everyone’s FPS” but you’re not making comparisons?
Give me a break.I’m not sure if you really are not getting it or you’re just refusing to get it.
Either way, I’m done trying to help people who refuse to be helped.Enjoy your PC.
-
@Atlas said in what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?:
@john1974
So… you are asking “what’s everyone’s FPS” but you’re not making comparisons?
Give me a break.I’m not sure if you really are not getting it or you’re just refusing to get it.
Either way, I’m done trying to help people who refuse to be helped.Enjoy your PC.
I think you’re the one who doesn’t get it. I specifically pointed out my MAIN reason WHY I asked for FPS post from my post…maybe read that again.
I certainly DO NOT WANT to get any HELP or OPINION from you if your way of answering won’t benefit the OP at all and feeling bad about their experience in the forum because some DUDE from the interwebs thinks he “knows it all” …no pun intended dude but instead of posting sarcasm…do truly HELP those who need help (NOT EVERYONE HERE has the same knowledge as you. Maybe you know it all. GOOD FOR YOU. ) instead of making them feel like they don’t belong or that they aren’t qualified to ask such questions…
You know what I AM HAPPY with my RIG. Thanks to those who truly helped and were patient with me.
PEACE!
-
@john1974
I’ve said what I wanted to say. I doubt repeating myself for the nth time would do anything.
You clearly refuse to learn and resort to gaslighting, projection, and defensive posturing.
While that may probably work on other genres of gaming, I believe it has no place in combat flight simulation.
I certainly would not want to debrief someone like you after a mission seeing as you can’t even handle an FPS discussion.You do you, bro.
Enjoy your PC. -
@john1974 - In order to measure FPS for a purpose that means anything, when we want to do that internally, we either use the Benchmark TE or we create a different “custom” TE for the specific purpose of the test. So generally I suggest to use one of the 2 options mentioned above and ask users how many FPS they get at different angles/looks. That would be a benchmark test that makes sense.
Cheers!
-
@john1974 said in what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?:
Just to give you guys/gals an update. I’m now able to run 120+ fps on the new rig.
Technically it is now able to run at 200+ FPS but I just enabled the frame limit to 120 FPS on RivaTuner
My New Rig specs are as follows:
Intel i9-14900K (I Undervolted to an offset of 0.1v, PL1=125w and PL2=253w, 307A limit) for reliability and stability
MSI MAG Z790 Tomahawk Max WIFI DDR5 with the latest BIOS update
Corsair Vengeance 32 GB DDR5 7200 RAM
Arctic cooler Liquid Freezer 360 III w/ upgraded P12 MAX fans
Cruicial 2 TB M.2 NVME
450 GB SATA 3 SSD
Corsair RM1200x PSU
ASUS RTX 4080 OC Edition (Undervolted to 0.940v at 2805 MHZ clock)
Lian Li Lancool 216 Black version
Windows 10 ProOverall, it runs pretty good and stable. Getting a Cinebench R23 score of 41K when on Extreme tuned @ 300W, but at the current default tune, it runs pretty cool and stable temps at 76c with an average score of 34k. For reliability and longevity it’s Pretty good so far.
Happy Flying!
As this is the BMS forum, why not run the one test in BMS designed to show FPS, the TE_BMS_00_Benchmark_Test TE (Under Tactical Engagement [SAVED]). Takes just a minute, this is 2560x1440 taken starting in Taxi… Even with this there can be variables in Nvidia settings, game settings, etc. but at least its a BMS Benchmark…
-
@Atlas said in what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?:
As such, there is a Benchmark TE included in the game and people usually use that and give numbers from either a cold jet or on the runway.
@Icer said in what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?:
There is really only one way to compare FPS. Same resolution, same BMS graphics settings, same NVidia 3D settings, same mission (Benchmark TE only) at the same spot at the same time… Usually that is sitting on the runway ready for TO… As @Atlas showed above, I can take a pic with 350FPS, can take one with 90, depends when and where I am, in what mission, etc.
@Atlas said in what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?:
Take off that limiter, run the Benchmark TE and let us know what your framerates are in the cold-and-dark jet and also on a hot jet sitting on the runway.
Let us know your resolution, nVidia settings, game settings, etc.
Then those numbers will be easier to compare with what others have reported.@Icer @I-Hawk
We’ve told him to do this at least 3x now as shown above and instead of doing so, he posts a screenshot of a frame-limited setup, clear skies, Angels 22, no MFD load, only 1 AI flight at 40nm distance… and comes back with a really triggered reply.He just wants numbers. He said I had nice FPS without a clue of my settings, testing TE, or even my hardware specs. If someone came here and posted 500 FPS or 800 FPS, he’ll probably just say “nice FPS” and won’t ask anything else because as he said, he isn’t here to do any comparison.
-
@Icer said in what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?:
@john1974 said in what's everyone's FPS on Campaigns for those who are on a RTX 40 series card?:
Just to give you guys/gals an update. I’m now able to run 120+ fps on the new rig.
Technically it is now able to run at 200+ FPS but I just enabled the frame limit to 120 FPS on RivaTuner
My New Rig specs are as follows:
Intel i9-14900K (I Undervolted to an offset of 0.1v, PL1=125w and PL2=253w, 307A limit) for reliability and stability
MSI MAG Z790 Tomahawk Max WIFI DDR5 with the latest BIOS update
Corsair Vengeance 32 GB DDR5 7200 RAM
Arctic cooler Liquid Freezer 360 III w/ upgraded P12 MAX fans
Cruicial 2 TB M.2 NVME
450 GB SATA 3 SSD
Corsair RM1200x PSU
ASUS RTX 4080 OC Edition (Undervolted to 0.940v at 2805 MHZ clock)
Lian Li Lancool 216 Black version
Windows 10 ProOverall, it runs pretty good and stable. Getting a Cinebench R23 score of 41K when on Extreme tuned @ 300W, but at the current default tune, it runs pretty cool and stable temps at 76c with an average score of 34k. For reliability and longevity it’s Pretty good so far.
Happy Flying!
As this is the BMS forum, why not run the one test in BMS designed to show FPS, the TE_BMS_00_Benchmark_Test TE (Under Tactical Engagement [SAVED]). Takes just a minute, this is 2560x1440 taken starting in Taxi… Even with this there can be variables in Nvidia settings, game settings, etc. but at least its a BMS Benchmark…
Thanks Icer, appreciate it. I ran the test just now, and I’m getting a fixed rate of 120 FPS as I have SET a LIMIT on my FPS using RIVATuner only to 120 FPS. I KNOW I could run MORE FPS, but i’m HAPPY with my current OC settings for the CPU and GPU, as I have undervolted my GPU to run at 0.940v @ 2790 Mhz, and also undervolted my CPU to 0.1v offset and PL1=125w, and PL2=253w, with a 307Amp default. The i9-14900K runs very stable at these settings on the MSI MAG motherboard.
I know about the variables in BMS being that different variations on the campaign plus the weather may tend to provide different FPS for different hardware specs. But I just wanted to get a basis and a reference before justifying pulling the trigger on a NEW RIG.
During the time when I had my OLD RIG, the tests that I previously had with the i7-4790 was really bottleneck. It just couldn’t keep up. It was still smooth 50-60FPS was okay, but I wanted more FPS (at least 120) hence why I asked the people in the forum for those who have a HIGH spec RIG what kind of FPS they were getting.
From there I could concluded that BMS wasn’t fully dependent on the GPU but was more on CPU, so even if i had the best GPU, it would still rely on the CPU to fully benefit the HIGH FPS.
Of course I was doing more tests on my OLD RIG before pulling the trigger cause it does COST quite a lot of $$$$ to spend on a NEW RIG upgrade if I could still push the i7-4790. Mortgage is more important than a new GAMING PC you know. hahaha.
Nevertheless I was able to find some GREAT deals on the parts, and was able to piece together my RIG and finally built it and get it running the way I expected it.
Right now i’m VERY happy with the performance of the new RIG. no regrets spending a bit to upgrade, after 15 years.
For now, the FPS limit of 120FPS is my sweet spot. So happy with that. Not willing to PUSH to Extreme to shorten the life of the CPU and GPU.
And I know that variables may affect that FPS, and even if it goes down from 120 to 80 FPS due to BMS variables, I’m still happy with it. Will still have a smooth experience.
-
So he ran the Benchmark TE… with a frame limiter in place.
I can’t even…“I’m a dot!!”