3DPIT WISHLIST
-
Voted….EF-2000 …It’s a must and …a step forward…
-
Voted Rafale and F-15 E, two real multi-role fighters, even if a backseat is needed for the Eagle (Sorry Qawa 8-))
Edit : connexion lost.
jhehe…I like the Rafale better for its looks, but the Eurofighter is also one kickass MR plane. IMHO one of the top planes in the latest Blocks, only topped by latest stealth fighters and maybe one of those Russian jets who can do fully redundant ballet in the sky. Pilot to plane interface, handling, capabilities are said to be top.
Pilots love it in Germany. They say it’s almost outlandish good. -
Eurofighter, of course.;)
-
Go RAFALE!!!
-
-
Eurofighter forever……
-
I voted Rafale
-
1/ F-16A
2/ F117
3/ EF2000 -
Don’t say you wouldn’t fly it!
Tj
-
We should have added to the list also the F-16 block 60 and the near-future USAF upgraded F-16’s with the CPD monitor…
-
Is there Block 60 in DB…? Most of features of Block 60 cannot be modeled, IMHO therefore it is pointless. You cannot model towed decoy, IRST, AESA radar. The more advaced ECM can be but I have never met any person who know how it works the ECM strenght value. You can increase the effectivness of ECM but only feedback what you can get if you tests it ingame.
I have to say I do understand why so many people wish to see AC which are not suitable for the engine while there are so many which are fit into Falcon universe quite well.
-
Is there Block 60 in DB…? Most of features of Block 60 cannot be modeled, IMHO therefore it is pointless. You cannot model towed decoy, IRST, AESA radar. The more advaced ECM can be but I have never met any person who know how it works the ECM strenght value. You can increase the effectivness of ECM but only feedback what you can get if you tests it ingame.
I think it was sarcasm. Wasn’t it?
I have to say I do understand why so many people wish to see AC which are not suitable for the engine while there are so many which are fit into Falcon universe quite well.
You do?
I have to say I’m a bit disappointed with the result of this poll. Seriously? F-15E? Rafale?! EF-2000?!
-
I have to say I do understand why so many people wish to see AC which are not suitable for the engine while there are so many which are fit into Falcon universe quite well.
I have to say I do understand why so many people wish see new funcion-switches that need a lot of code-work (mounth if not years) when the community have a lot of modelers, graphics and talented (and motivated) guys that want to still alive the “falcon” world… bah… each one have his opinion…
-
Voted F16A
-
I think it was sarcasm. Wasn’t it?
Which comment? Mine or Raptor’s? Mine was not sarcastic.
-
Not yours, his comment. I agree with you on this subject.
-
to paraphrase the Rolling Stones " you can’t always get what you want" !: reading the title of the thread does not mean he will make the most desired…
-
to paraphrase the Rolling Stones “you can’t always get what you want”
Yeah, I know…
but EF-2000?;) -
Most of features of Block 60 cannot be modeled
That’s why we vote for 3D cockpit, wich are graphics not Features ^^
Unless I misunderstood what you mean ?
I find it awesome how the fight is on between the Rafale and the Eurofighter !
It’s like a football game for me lol -
What I don’t understand is why the rafale was included or considered. Didn’t someone try this before and was discouraged because of some legal shit or something. And that was just for the 3D model if I recall now we want a cockpit? If we couldn’t have a 3D model why would we be able to include a pit?