Request - F-22 (Full capability) ,SU-30 SU-35 and 37 (Missing thrust vectoring Nozzel
-
Hi,
i m new to this forum but i started flying F-16 back in 2003 . My concern is jets like Su-30 , Su-35 and Su-37 these jets are having thrust vectoring nozzles . It would be really great if BMS can give them their actual capabilities It would add more realism during an air combat. I am a die hard F-22 Fan i request BMS to give us working model of F-22 with its full capabilities such as stealth , speed and Maneuverability.
Secondly, top speed of an F-16 fighter jet is 1350 MPH but why it does not fly at that speed in BMS ?Please see if you can do something on my request.
I wish all the best to my Fav. BMS team keep up the good work .Regards
Mav -
This post is deleted! -
-
great way to introduce yourself mavrick07
Would you reread your post and realise how much you’re asking bms? Isn’t that a bit arrogant ?Pass the popcorn harry
-
Sorry for not posting anything constructive; I just find it funny how people just expect you guys to bow down and give in to their demands, let alone how impossible it is to get usable data on such highly classified subjects.
-
Dear Red,i did’nt mean to sound that way,
I only asked Bms to give these aircraft their actual capabilities . -
when you demand something, please consider that the bms dev group develop a non commercial products, are driven by volontary work. the team members have families, real life obligation, job and they probably won’t stop all they do daily just because a newcomer comes in and demand thrust vectoring flight modelling and stealth capabilities. both of which having huge implications in the rest of the sim.
Do you have any realistic idea how long it took to model the current F-16 flight model?
Just be a little bit more realistic !!
-
Dear Red,i did’nt mean to sound that way,
I only asked Bms to give these aircraft their actual capabilities .go ask the russian ministry of defense to give you the specs on their latest TV testbeds, once they do come back here and tell us what they are
when you get back in 50 years maybe work can begin on giving them their full capabilities
-
RD and Planehazza,
Your reaction is exactly why so many won’t post to this forum. Mav is new. He said so. Post # 1. He obviously doesn’t know how hard it is, so why not take the time to explain it, and if you don’t have the time, avoid dropping a nuke on the “newbie”? He clearly loves the sim, as do I, and his comments are not out of line with other views/requests.
I know, I know…search the forum. Well, he’s new, and search isn’t as efficient in many cases UNLESS you’ve been on the forum for years and remember exact terms to call up THE specific thread that MIGHT answer the question.
I wouldn’t take his seeking to understand for arrogance. I know you guys are busy, and I appreciate all you do, but this is a detractor from your fine service.
db
-
Your reaction is exactly why so many won’t post to this forum. Mav is new. He said so. Post # 1. He obviously doesn’t know how hard it is, so why not take the time to explain it, and if you don’t have the time, avoid dropping a nuke on the “newbie”? He clearly loves the sim, as do I, and his comments are not out of line with other views/requests.
this reaction is why some bms dev looses motivation
you have to see both side of the fenceThe OP didn’t request help, he demands totally unrealistic things and didn’t even took the time to present himself.
This behaviour is very arrogant and is quite far from being very smart. We also had a bunch of users who have done the very same in the past. It appears they were all the same guy who we have banned multiple timesso on top of the newbee pov, on top of the developper pov, there is also the moderator pov.
-
I get it RD…I have years of experience leading and managing software devs, but we all have customers. He is one.
Have a wonderfully great day, guys. Don’t pile on too much. DB out.
-
Customers? Demand? Request? Sometimes, definitions make it all. Not sure you’re all speaking of the same thing.
Tried to be constructive. Have a nice day.
-
Hi,
Hi bro!!
i m new to this forum but i started flying F-16 back in 2003 . My concern is jets like Su-30 , Su-35 and Su-37 these jets are having thrust vectoring nozzles . It would be really great if BMS can give them their actual capabilities It would add more realism during an air combat. I am a die hard F-22 Fan i request BMS to give us working model of F-22 with its full capabilities such as stealth , speed and Maneuverability.
Secondly, top speed of an F-16 fighter jet is 1350 MPH but why it does not fly at that speed in BMS ?Wellcome to the comunnity
About Flight models, it is difficult, BMS only use real & trusty data, trust the info over internet is not good, in fact about new military tech for that reason a lot of BMS FM are only good not perfect.
Develop the code to handle trust vectoring require that the few programmers of BMS stop they work in order to do that, when fix bugs and rewrite some BMS code is more “urgent” or we could say, more interesting because is going to be more used, trust vectoring is only going use in Dogfight, and rarely a human will get a dogfight vs Su30 in campaign, for example is more interesting rewrite the Awacs code to allow you better comms like a real picture.About the F16 speed… where did you get that info? how are you testing that? sure that info that you get is from a F16 without munitions and the half of the fuel loaded at 30000 feets and you are using other configuration.
There is a video in youtube that show how accurate is the F18 and the F16 BMS flight models.
Please see if you can do something on my request.
I wish all the best to my Fav. BMS team keep up the good work .Regards
MavWith the time everything will come. 3 or 4 weeks
Greetings Revientor
-
This post is deleted!